Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195   Older >   >>
This stand of centre is rubbish
by pradeep agarwal on Sep 12, 2007 05:42 PM  Permalink 

If what is written in affidavit is the basis of deciding the existance of Lord Ram than this government can't be trusted for security of Hindu establishments.Hindu's must unite immediately against threat to our existance under this evil coalition.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Don't try to create a problem
by on Sep 12, 2007 05:42 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This congress is meant for creating problem only for hindus.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Don't try to create a problem
by Nandakumar R on Sep 12, 2007 06:11 PM  Permalink
When Gandhi(M.k.Gandhi), supported blindly, inspite of the fanaticism by Jinnah,inspite of Hindus massacred at the time of partision, inspite of Hindu girls and women raped,GODSE ROSE TO THE OCCASSION and killed Gandhi. Today, again this Govt is doing the same. They support more of them, and humiliate Hindus. So once again GODSE like some one has to born and do the rest to this Govt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why Bridge was required
by SANJAY on Sep 12, 2007 05:42 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Ram was a God why he required bridge to cross to Sri Lanka, he could have gone without it as Ravan did. How can monkeys build a bridge, no sense, If Ram is a god than he doesn't require Bridge.



    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:Why Bridge was required
by mansoor kudsi on Sep 12, 2007 05:43 PM  Permalink
RAM from Ramayana is not the GOD. Read this article from Dr. Chatterjee...



http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Pantheon/4789/Articles/General/hindu_awake.htm#THE%20HINDU%20REL IGION%20EXPOSED

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Why Bridge was required
by Vijay alias Teesmar Khan on Sep 12, 2007 05:43 PM  Permalink
Ram was a god or may not be, but his fellows were certainly not gods. They required a bridge to cross the sea.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why Bridge was required
by Blaster on Sep 12, 2007 05:45 PM  Permalink
You have proved you can think. More over how come Ravana was more powerful then RAM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ram is in the mann
by Manish Kapur on Sep 12, 2007 05:41 PM  Permalink 

Mann se ravan jo nikale ram uske mann mein hein.



Who are the archelogical society of india to dig up peoples mann and find out if there is ram or ravan there?





    Forward  |  Report abuse
True Facts are hard to Digest!!!!!!!!
by BahujanHitay BahujanSukhay on Sep 12, 2007 05:41 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Dear Friends, true facts are always hard to digest. It is true fact that, Ayodha so called place of birth of Ram doesn't have any evidence to show that he was existed there after lot of digging and archological exercises to prove somthing. But at last it revealed that today's Ayodhya is yesterday's Saket. Buddha frequently visited this place. The remians of big Buddhist monastry were found at the place of so called Ramjanmabhumi. It is better to live in a reality than delusion. Anyway the so called Ram sethu is not a Temple but a peice of land formed beneath the sea which is obstructing passage of ships. There is no point in wasting money and time for ships to travel long way. So it is better to have a passage between so called Ramsethu for ships to travel. There is no point in beating your chest in vain.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:True Facts are hard to Digest!!!!!!!!
by Venkat K on Sep 12, 2007 05:43 PM  Permalink
"There is no point in beating your chest in vain."

This is india,
Peoples sentiments are being hurt.

Try ur logic with other peaceful religions
oh i forgot by this time there would be strikes and chaos.

its easy to target hindus by fools like you, i dont see ur intellectual debates regarding other religions

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:True Facts are hard to Digest!!!!!!!!
by arungopal agarwal on Sep 12, 2007 05:48 PM  Permalink
Your argument logically OK, but If Ram is Lord(Bhagwan) it is a matter of faith, no argument.Your logic will not change one!s impression.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
how can it be proved????
by swan on Sep 12, 2007 05:41 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

can anybody prove mohd, christ ever existed???

NO. then can these congresi go n destroy churches n mosques ??? NO. Can these congresi prove they had a grandfather???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:how can it be proved????
by SANJAY on Sep 12, 2007 05:43 PM  Permalink
Ram was a God why he required bridge to cross to Sri Lanka, he could have gone without it as Ravan did. How can monkeys build a bridge, no sense, If Ram is a god than he doesn't require Bridge.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:how can it be proved????
by Trendy on Sep 12, 2007 05:47 PM  Permalink
Forget about his supernatural powers..first we will talk about his existance in history

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:how can it be proved????
by Trendy on Sep 12, 2007 05:45 PM  Permalink
GO JOIN IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:how can it be proved????
by Trendy on Sep 12, 2007 05:46 PM  Permalink
SANJAY, GO JOIN IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:how can it be proved????
by rajath kumar on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink
hi Swan i can understand what one goes through when somebody has to face the sitiuation you are facing.Ask these centre people to prove that ramsethu was not build by human?? answer would be BIG NO as one cant prove that is was build similarly one cant prove that it was not build.One more thing swan we are the educated generation of today and we has the responsibility to take this nation forward just because our sentiments are hurt we dont have any right to raise questions about other religions!!!!!we need to remember that green saffron and white are three parts of our national flag and no one colour can become whole of the flag.dont stupidly raise questions about the existence of Christ and Mohammed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
How can Govt say that
by Sreenivasa Rao on Sep 12, 2007 05:40 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

How can Govt say there is no RAm and Ramayana..It is utter stupidity.The Bridge itself was found by NASA photographs.Ram existed and Ramayana is described in more readable/historical form that's it.

Jai Sreeram.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RAM SETU
by ASHOK KELKAR on Sep 12, 2007 05:40 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Friends there is proof in Ramayana itself of, if you carefully read the discription and guidelines given by Sugreev to his soldaiers while they were sent to search Seeta. He has discribed about a Trident on as limit for EST direction which is made by Lord Vishnu, this Trident can only be seen from Air craft and it is located on South america in Peru's Mountain.
Also When Ram was returning to Ayodhya in PLANE called "PUSHPAK" he has shown so many places to Seeta. and such discription can only be possible if anyone travelled by Air from so called route from coast of Lank to Ayodhya.Another proff is that RAVANA's legel hair are still getting PENSION from Sri Lanka Govt.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RAM SETU
by on Sep 12, 2007 05:45 PM  Permalink
Does Ravana's legal hair (or should that be heir) also have 10 heads?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195   Older >   >>
Write a message