Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185   Older >   >>
Are any Hindus remaining in UPA govt.?
by Neeraj Avalaskar on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

What the UPA government headed Italian Ms. Gandhi thinks? Is there any evidence proving Jesus was there?
This lady will ruin India and her culture, she is the one who got her children baptised by church father...
She is true christan and would want every Indian to get converted to Christianity.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Are any Hindus remaining in UPA govt.?
by cycube on Sep 12, 2007 05:59 PM  Permalink

why blame the white woman...she is just a figurehead. its well known that brown indian men prefer white women. eg. nehroo fooled around with an englishwoman, rajeev with an italian and now the little rahool with an white colombian woman.

its just a coincidence that most white women are christians, dont bring other religions into your inter-hindoo north-south politics.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Are any Hindus remaining in UPA govt.?
by Neeraj Avalaskar on Sep 12, 2007 06:01 PM  Permalink
who the hell christian are you? you a convert...
you a italian licker

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Are any Hindus remaining in UPA govt.?
by cycube on Sep 12, 2007 06:04 PM  Permalink

dont bring other religions into your inter-hindoo north-south politics

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dare to say Mohammed was non-existent??
by Hari Menon on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Will the Congress ever say that Mohammed was non-existent??

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Dare to say Mohammed was non-existent??
by Dr. Ravi Mathur on Sep 12, 2007 06:03 PM  Permalink
good point

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Dare to say Mohammed was non-existent??
by Manorama kumari on Sep 12, 2007 06:05 PM  Permalink
which point pls elaborate

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Dare to say Mohammed was non-existent??
by Manorama kumari on Sep 12, 2007 06:04 PM  Permalink
Bloody Ass on earth did u go inspect Mr. Mohammeds tomb in saudi arabia and confirm from your fore fathers that it is Mr. mohammed grave and then pls comment here.

Where is Mr. christs grave I belkieve he rose on the day of easter and so is easter celebrated.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Dare to say Mohammed was non-existent??
by Dr. Ravi Mathur on Sep 12, 2007 06:04 PM  Permalink
Hari your point is valid

   Forward   |   Report abuse
virgin births - OK. bridges- not OK
by Sree Jani on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is sad that secularism means destroying Hinduism and sucking up to the terrorist-like evangelisms of Christians. No one is worried about evidence on "virgins" giving births and fat people walking on water, but the government needs to worry about whether a bridge existed. the ASI folks should be drowned.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:virgin births - OK. bridges- not OK
by Blaster on Sep 12, 2007 05:59 PM  Permalink
Sree Jani, It Sethu and UPA dont pull Christians and Muslims you idiot.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Can these be true - THINK!
by Blaster on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

1)Can we believe Monkeys buliding bridges
2)Ravana with 10 heads
3)His brother who sleeps for full 6 months
4)A missile - Anti Missile war using arrows

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by kesav anand on Sep 12, 2007 06:02 PM  Permalink
God is there, you have to die to see him and then you will believe all these, are you ready?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by kesav anand on Sep 12, 2007 06:07 PM  Permalink
Dear Blaster,
Just reply to sivajibhai question. PROVE IT...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by blue leaf on Sep 12, 2007 06:01 PM  Permalink
Ha ha ha good one...we need proof... :-) though its a bit indecent to ask...you deserve it...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by SANJAY on Sep 12, 2007 05:59 PM  Permalink
Ram was a God why he required bridge to cross to Sri Lanka, he could have gone without it as Ravan did. How can monkeys build a bridge, no sense, If Ram is a god than he doesn't require Bridge

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by Ramanath Babu on Sep 12, 2007 07:23 PM  Permalink
Mr. Sanjay,

For that you need to study Ramayan, which unfortunately you did not. Neither your parents know all these facts. Those who are borne to low class think very lowly.

My advice to you is to read Ramayan carefully and you will get all answers. Being a Hindu do that or commit suicide!

Babu

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by Shree on Sep 12, 2007 06:03 PM  Permalink
U Id**t

Ram built the bridge for monkeys and not for him,



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by Shree on Sep 12, 2007 06:03 PM  Permalink
U Id**t

Ram built the bridge for monkeys and not for him,



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by shylaja varma on Sep 12, 2007 06:12 PM  Permalink
There is a scientific answer to everything.How can a virgin have a baby- test tube baby's could be the answer.
Regarding missiles-A study is being made of our scriptures in a place called Melkote in Karnataka where they have found that a material which was applied on flying objects made it impossible for a radar to trace the flying object.History is only repeating Knowledge already existed.Our scriptures don't lie.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Can these be true - THINK!
by Sree Jani on Sep 12, 2007 06:00 PM  Permalink
same as virgins giving birth, fat morons walking on water, water turning to urine (oh wait, wine), and maybe we can find one more in each page of the joke called Bible

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
No Ram so no muhammed and jesus
by mukesh rawal on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink 




in Bhavisya Purana there is written about Jesus, Muhamed, Buddha, Adi-sankaracharya, Caitanya Mahaprabhu along with Lord Ram, Lord Vishnu and Lord Krishna. And this is not a Hindu or any other religion's puran or letrature, this is Vedic Purana means ancient literature about God. So if any one God or son of God of them exists then Lord Ram had Exists. and if Lord Ram didn't exist means any one of them didn't exists at all.
Many people in centre know this is wrong but to have other community's vote and for money they are doing this nonsence. Let them do.
Don't deviate from your path of Bhakti.
Mukesh


    Forward  |  Report abuse
inter-hindoo and north-south politics
by cycube on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies



why blame the white woman...she is just a figurehead. its well known that brown indian men prefer white women. eg. nehroo fooled around with an englishwoman, rajeev with an italian and now the little rahool with an white colombian woman.



its just a coincidence that most white women are christians, dont bring other religions into your inter-hindoo north-south politics.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
There is no Ram only Budda was present
by SANJAY on Sep 12, 2007 05:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Ram was a God why he required bridge to cross to Sri Lanka, he could have gone without it as Ravan did. How can monkeys build a bridge, no sense, If Ram is a god than he doesn't require Bridge

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:There is no Ram only Budda was present
by kesav anand on Sep 12, 2007 06:04 PM  Permalink
First read Ramayana completely, Ram do not know that he was a GOD when he was as Ram. Ram avatar IS a Human avatar of GOD. Just as you dont know how stupid you are in questioning GOD.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There is no Ram only Budda was present
by SANJAY on Sep 12, 2007 06:06 PM  Permalink
Wow than who was God when Ram doesnt know he is God who brought him in this world may be the Sadhu interesting

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There is no Ram only Budda was present
by deepakreddy kj on Sep 12, 2007 07:45 PM  Permalink
Ram was the direct incarnation of God. He still has to go by the natures rules and regulations. If everyone comes to know/see his powers then everyone will start depending on him and individual abilities will not be seen and which could inturn degrade the living beings/living beings-capacity. So it does make sense. well, u urself were a monkey someday. Think about it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185   Older >   >>
Write a message