government must protect the structure to respect the sentiments of billions of hindus world over and promote tourism to the holy bridge.Look at Islear though their is no proof that Mohammad axcended heaven on flying horse back still it protects the mosque on the temple mound.Islear also protects many confilting caves believed to be jesus last resting place,even though their is no proof of that.
A secular government led by Roman catholic ans sikh can do much better.
RE:''WHO THE HELL IS ALLAH?''
by good boy on Sep 12, 2007 07:37 PM Permalink
YOU IDIOT ... DONT DRAG OTHER RELEGIONS IN THIS CONTREVESY ... WHAT HARM HAVE THEY DONE YOU FOR PERSONALLY ...
REGARDING RAM ISSUE ... YOU WILL GET SOLUTION SOON AUTOMATICALLY ...
IDIOTS LIKE U .. TRY TO BE SMART, LIVE AND DIE LIKE A COWDUNG ..
RE:''WHO THE HELL IS ALLAH?''
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:37 PM Permalink
Shoor, Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM SHOULD NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY. Ever heard of "Property Rights".
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
RE:RE:''WHO THE HELL IS ALLAH?''
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:38 PM Permalink
That was wrong. I have never supported the creation of Pakistan. I have always opposed it. I also oppose the separation of Kashmir from India...So what is your point.
I do not understand why Muslims are being dragged into this controversy. This is purely an unnecessary controversy created to disturb the peace by some fool in a Govt Department. I also do not understand why people by Muslim name are fanning this controversy. Can't they keep their mouth shut.
RE:The controversy over Ram
by Dalit Panther on Sep 12, 2007 07:38 PM Permalink
wrong.it is not north and south politics. it is forward caste and lower caste politics.
RE:Secularism does NOT mean hurting Hindu Sentiments.
by Hemant on Sep 12, 2007 07:35 PM Permalink
You are very wrong Mr. Mukherjee, in India it is always been secularism means subvert hindus. Untill & unless we stand united, these kind of attack will continue
It is just story, i have been certified in Ramayana, Ram was a good king at that time as i heard from my friends. It is like a DDLJ movie. there is nothing in Ramayana other than saving sita from Ravan. To get higher post in the community people made diiferent story like ramayan, mahabarath, which is never happend in this world. only we can concentrate more is on vedas which talks about supreme power, but still there is mistakes in that too due to man made changes. Original vedas not available abd no one knows who have written vedas.
Hindu has been originated from the sindhu river, in this case all indians are hindus. people are migrated from different parts of the world like, persians, indonasia etc to india and created many gods/goddeses, and many casts/sucasts.
It is my personal openion, not to attack any religion.
RE:it is another story
by c k on Sep 12, 2007 07:35 PM Permalink
Dear you have learned from the history written by communists and marxists & agents of England.
RE:it is another story
by Ashish Kumar on Sep 12, 2007 07:35 PM Permalink
mind your words and concentrate on your allah, i am too certfied islamic profession. Allah married 5 yrs old, how can he be a god.....better go to ur wifes and dozen children.
RE:it is another story
by ahmed kasim on Sep 12, 2007 07:56 PM Permalink
buddy, dont lie, lie will shine for a short period, but truth will remain for a everlast. Allah is not muslims god name. Exsitence of supreme power is called God in english, allah in arabic, baghvan in hindi. Alalh is an arabic word which means Al ilahu ie who knows everything, the supreme power. Word Allah was there in old bible, old testamonila(jews) even Vedas talks about supreme power.
RE:it is another story
by ashok pai on Sep 12, 2007 07:36 PM Permalink
you are a troll, and you dont know an iota of history, please stop commenting about other religions without knowing anything about it.
RE:RE:it is another story
by ahmed kasim on Sep 12, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
be an open minded, do reseacrh on all the religion, then you will say that religions are created by humans.
Its irrelevant to talk about historicity of Ram or Ramayana in this issue. The question here is about an EXISTING MAN -MADE BRIDGE. If this bridge is really man-made then IT MUST BE PROTECTED. Because this will be a huge 'coincidence' with Ramayana story.
The focus of debate has to be whether its MAN-MADE or not. Not that who made it ! Becoz whoever made it, the bridge is an ancient monument of India !!
And, IF its really man-made, then its the bridge which will be a historical evidence of Ramayana, not the other way round as ASI is trying to say !!
RE:??
by afzal ahmed on Sep 12, 2007 07:36 PM Permalink
Becasue history is based upon tangible material evidence and Babri Masjid did exist. Faith and imagination is something else, even if collective millions believe it.
RE:Destroy all churches
by afzal ahmed on Sep 12, 2007 07:39 PM Permalink
No one is asking temples to be pulled down. The report only says that there is no material evidence to sustantiate the story of Ramayan.
RE:Destroy all churches
by Alexander on Sep 12, 2007 07:42 PM Permalink
exactly.. no one says that all temples should be pulled down because ram exists...
RE:Destroy all churches
by cycube on Sep 12, 2007 07:32 PM Permalink
Why blame the poor white woman...she is just a figurehead. Its well known that brown Indian men prefer white foreign women. eg. Nehroo fooled around with an Englishwoman, Rajeev with an Italian and now the little Rahool with a white Colombian woman.
It just happens to be a coincidence that most white women are Christians, no sinister evangelical conspiracy in brown-white love affairs ! he he
Please dont bring other religions in your Inter-Hindoo North-South politics.
RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram, Centre to SC
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 07:36 PM Permalink
MotherCh**d Convert,
When you call names to Hindus, you're calling names to your forefathers. It'ls like spitting up in the air and comes back at your face. Converts like you disgust me.
