RE:Send Protest Letters to%u2026
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 08:01 PM Permalink
Thats a better way to voice ur opinion..
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
RE:Send Protest Letters to%u2026
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 08:16 PM Permalink
Muslims are finally ready to give-up Mecca and Medina. No more Haj headaches for tax payers..!!
its written in history paper, if u will go thru u willl find it, i waas surprised but i think its true. meek and coward, bear this. not new. neta knows thats y its happening. can they do it for any other religion, govt will fall. let be pop reach more than 25%. it will be islamic republic of india. enjoy
RE:hindus r coward and meek
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:56 PM Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
RE:hindus r coward and meek
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 07:58 PM Permalink
I couldn't help noticing this as you seem to have posted this more than once. Are you then suggesting Mecca and Medina are not of religious consequence? Do you also mean for the Country's development any Mosqur or Darga can be done away with. if so please confirm, going by your first name the Congress idiots can claim they have finally found one tolerant Muslim.
RE:hindus r coward and meek
by bhawna verma on Sep 12, 2007 08:03 PM Permalink
u voted for them. its ur creature. dont make hue and cry. they know thats y they damn care ur sentiment. u can change it, but u wont. any writer who writes truth have been thrown out, because we r secular we cant write. read tavleen singh article. she was thrown from india today. but did u say naything
RE:hindus r coward and meek
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 08:06 PM Permalink
They are a property of the Masjid Trust. The government or anyone has NO claim on them. If a Muslim were to claim a property of someone else based on his/her religious belief...then yes, that is WRONG.
Government cannot take away property belonging to an individual without his/her permission.
RE:hindus r coward and meek
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 08:27 PM Permalink
Dude wake up to realities, this Govt is apuppet in MNCs hand all your SEZs are done through land acquistions from Individuals. 'Property Rights' is NOT a fundamental right and as such the Govt is able to override it. Go through one experinec of land acquition with this Govt and you will know how firm your 'property Rights' are. the question here is of Sensitivities between human beings. No one can conclusively prove that Muhamed was indeed the messenger of God. Yu beleive it becos your Dad does and probably his forefathers did. So lets not just bring in legal point for argument's sake.
RE:Send Protest Letters to%u2026
by bhawna verma on Sep 12, 2007 07:58 PM Permalink
u accepted sonia gandhi, not possible in any other, and stupid feel proud, we r secular. we lick a... u vote for them
RE:Puppet PM
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
RE:Puppet PM
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 08:17 PM Permalink
Muslims are finally ready to give-up Mecca and Medina. No more Haj headaches for tax payers..!!
RE:UPA is run by Macaulayians
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
RE:Ganpat Amarnath
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:54 PM Permalink
Ganpat, Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference. Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
RE:Ganpat Amarnath
by Razor on Sep 12, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
Imran,
You dumbwitted peice of shit, would love to her your views if Saudi Governmebt decided to built a Hotel on lands of Mecca. After all, Allah is also a belief.
RE:Ganpat Amarnath
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:58 PM Permalink
That is your opinion. I do NOT support any terrorist. Stop making these general statements.
RE:RE:RE:Ganpat Amarnath
by Karunanidhi on Sep 12, 2007 08:05 PM Permalink
Terrorists say Quran says to do all those attacks. That means either Quaran is wrong or terrorists are wrong.
RE:Ganpat Amarnath
by biz Narayan on Sep 12, 2007 07:59 PM Permalink
Thugs cleanse lands to make it pure for islam and in name of Allah, when all that is to gain power and suffocate other muslims.
Muslims claim waqf property in terms of Allah.
Forget about land, they capture a lot more than land.
Living in Modern Age - but still talk like fools ?
Hinduism teaches that a person should learn from his nature - use his senses ? This is the basic difference betweeen Hinduism and other Religions - It's not just based on one book written some 15000 years ago? Grow up -
RE:What's Wrong ?
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 08:02 PM Permalink
Are you some kind of a nut case..! you are posting the same message..why don't you add more saner thoughts like Jihad in your debate..
RE:What's Wrong ?
by biz Narayan on Sep 12, 2007 08:02 PM Permalink
The traitors defected in one age in matter of kingdoms. Now we have intellectual perverts who want to appropriate interpretations and destroy them.
Hinduism doesn't say to succumb to senses, earn money by selling to eurocentrism and then buy liquor.
RE:What's Wrong ?
by Ramesh Soni on Sep 12, 2007 08:23 PM Permalink
Did u see jurasic park movie. That had flying dynosaurs .. did u see dynosaurs in real life. The reason it is difficult for you to believe that monkeys could have flied is because you have been seeing monkeys since you were kid and they never flied.
There sure were monkeys who could leap long distances. These days they cant coz ....
RE:laden & congress are same breed
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:55 PM Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
I AM AGAINST THIS BRIDGE BECAUSE IF THERE WAS AN OLD BRIDGE WHY WE CANNOT BUILD A NEW ONE TO KEEP THE MEMORY ALIVE AND PUT THE NAME RAMASETHUSAMUDRAM. EVERYBODY CAN USE THE COMMON SENCE.
RE:ASI REPORT
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:55 PM Permalink
Randeep, Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference. Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
