Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115   Older >   >>
Eying minority votes
by Shashank Tikekar on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

UPA is trying to please minorities by insulting Hindu sentiments. When anything comes contrary to belief of minorities, even not so provocing, Govt throws out all its wisdom & takes side with hardliners like banning movie Davinchi Code.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Eying minority votes
by Mama Biskhot on Sep 12, 2007 10:02 PM  Permalink
This is a stupid Comment, if they eye only minority Votes, they will lose Majority. This is being done for India's Progress, there is no Religious motive behind this

   Forward   |   Report abuse
TN Politics
by balu on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The problem in TN is the undercurrent hatredness towards brahmin by DMK group and all their actions linked to that

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:TN Politics
by Harish Padasalgi on Sep 12, 2007 09:55 PM  Permalink
Karunadhi himself is a cross bread

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:TN Politics
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 09:57 PM  Permalink
I hear this BhenCh**d CM is totally anti-Hindu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:TN Politics
by Arun karthick on Sep 12, 2007 09:59 PM  Permalink
Who is brahmin.

no caste in TN.

all r equal.

all ur political games cannot work here.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:TN Politics
by balu on Sep 12, 2007 10:10 PM  Permalink
Yes. No caste in TN. But among general public. Still DMK / DK group has that. Also, the Dalits are not able to function as panchayat leaders. Mr Arun, I am from TN and u can not hide facts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Shame on UPA
by Srinivas on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Stupid UPA leaders are sucking your own a...ss now

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Shame on UPA
by Harish Padasalgi on Sep 12, 2007 09:54 PM  Permalink
It should be sucking each others!!!!!!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ram or Christ
by Tony Perera on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

My dear Indians

Why bring religion into the developments of countries. Let the statements come and why hinder the development by bringing in old histories. Let India develop build more bridges and develop and join with the developed countries. We always try to push ourselves backward when the whole world is going forward. Leave alone the religion Ram or christ. Just look into the developments we need in todays world for us and for our future generations. Do the things which would help our future generations as were done by Britishers which we are enjoying even today. Leave the religion aside and enjoy the freedom and improve in life instead of being orthodox and backward.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:Ram or Christ
by sourabh bhalotia on Sep 12, 2007 09:57 PM  Permalink
plzz retain ur advices with u.
in the present state where the govt is ready to fall to any depth for appeasing christians and muslims, we hindus have the right to ask for our stature.
we are not objecting to the developments.
the construction of canal can be done by adapting alternate means.
but since the sonia manio ghandi govt is christian favour in activities they are not laying emphasis on the alternate ways.plzzz reply

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram or Christ
by FAPS on Sep 12, 2007 09:59 PM  Permalink
Go, build a bridge in the vatican.

The British looted and plundered India. They
built things for their own benefit. If they hadn't suppressed Indians for so many years, the Golden Bird would still be flying high.

Their is nothin backward about supporting your religion and beliefs.

Why don't you tell your church to stop converting people.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram or Christ
by Srinivas on Sep 12, 2007 09:56 PM  Permalink
Tony do aggreeJesus never born its just story lik americk made for first step to moon

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram or Christ
by on Sep 12, 2007 10:05 PM  Permalink
Actually the existence of Christ is rather well-documented. Every Roman historian worth his salt mentioned "Christus" as a "Jewish leader" who fomented revolutions against the Roman Empire in the time of Tiberius.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram or Christ
by hepsibah rani on Sep 12, 2007 10:19 PM  Permalink
Dear Tony

Exactly thats what every sensible person wants, development, prosperity and harmony. But to keep a name or have an identity for your son or daughter(your so called future generation-future generation starts from your family)it is important to know your past, so even going forward you look back, if you dont you r not called a human. And i don't think you would be delighted if someone is throwing shit at your past and hurting your sentiments. So let us hope that GOD will give some sense to these people and concentrate on development without hurting anyones sentiments.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram or Christ
by Mama Biskhot on Sep 12, 2007 09:58 PM  Permalink
Well said.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram or Christ
by balu on Sep 12, 2007 09:56 PM  Permalink
It is not just religious. Whatever the reason, we can not destroy Taj Mahal or Liberty Statue. It is a ancient treasure. Plus would create ecological imbalance.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Lesson
by Harish Padasalgi on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

ITS HIGH TIME FOR ALL THE INDIANS TO TEACH THESE LEFTISTS A RIGHT LESSON, AND SEND THIS CONGRESS TO US TO DO THE POLITICS>>>>>>> THEY SHOULD KNOW HOW TO BEHAVE IN INDIA BEFORE ENTERING THIS COUNTRY


SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
TS HIGH TIME FOR ALL THE INDIANS TO TEACH THESE LEFTISTS A RIGHT LESSON, AND SEND THIS CONGRESS TO US TO DO THE POLITICS>>>>>>> THEY SHOULD KNOW HOW TO BEHAVE IN INDIA BEFORE ENTERING THIS COUNTRY


SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Lesson
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 10:00 PM  Permalink
Fella,

Looks like you're a convert.You keep Indian names and then stab us back. You self-hating converts, White-Mans-ass-wiping-boys,disgust me most.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ram sethu.
by kailas v on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink 

What are the possibilities that the government stand quetioning the very existence of Rama will be used by fundamentalists in the below ways.



1. Hindus Fundamentalists to polarise the hindu votes.

2. Muslims to to promote their religion

2. Christian missionaries to promote christianity utilising the govt view on Rama.



I personally feel that Congress / DMK / Communists will not have taken this stand had this had involved Muslim or Christian sentiments. This is Pseudo secularism at its worst.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Correct decision
by udayam enterprises on Sep 12, 2007 09:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

You see, the religious people -- most of them -- really think this planet is an experiment. That's what their beliefs come down to. Some god or other is always fixing and poking, messing around with tradesmen's wives, giving tablets on mountains, commanding you to mutilate your children, telling people what words they can say and what words they can't say, making people feel guilty about enjoying themselves, and like that. Why can't the gods leave well enough alone? All this intervention speaks of incompetence. If God didn't want Lot's wife to look back, why didn't he make her obedient, so she'd do what her husband told her? Or if he hadn't made Lot such a shithead, maybe she would've listened to him more. If God is omnipotent and omniscient, why didn't he start the universe out in the first place so it would come out the way he wants? Why's he constantly repairing and complaining? No, there's one thing the all religious books(koran, bible and gita) makes clear: The religious God is a sloppy manufacturer. He's not good at design, he's not good at execution. He'd be out of business if there was any competition. [Sol Hadden in Carl Sagan's Contact (New York: Pocket Books, 1985), p. 285.]







    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Correct decision
by Srinivas on Sep 12, 2007 09:55 PM  Permalink
Idiot Udayam what the hell you were doing when there are roits for prohet Mohamed cartoons. Were you had shit on your mouth during those days. Now don't have the same shit in your mouth

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Correct decision
by udayam enterprises on Sep 12, 2007 09:57 PM  Permalink
Talk about science not Fables!!!Get a life you moron, join the muslim Morons.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Insane act
by Ramachandran Hariharan on Sep 12, 2007 09:51 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The move to prove or disprove that Ram existed based on material evidence is like trying to pretend that we are supreme and know everything. The realm of science is what we know now and that of philosophy is the open mind to accept or modify our ways of thinking in the light of newer knowledge. Sad that a country claiming to have such a long cherished heritage should come down to the level of mentally immature and sick! Try telling the world that Allah or Jesus never existed and see how their believers respond! What we do know now is our knowledge of the past is very meagre as we know only of recorded history, the present we are trying to understand and the future is beyond our wildest imagination. Let us not waste our present for small political gains and let the future speak about as as a bunch of insane humans!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Insane act
by Karnataka Bhawan on Sep 12, 2007 09:53 PM  Permalink
it appears to me you were born when your ammi married her cousin brother. Am i right?

Do not be ashamed to use your muslim name

   Forward   |   Report abuse
NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE EXISTENCE OF RAM
by Anil Vaishnav on Sep 12, 2007 09:50 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

IT SEEMS CONGRESS ARE BENT UPON DESTROYING

HINDUISM.THEY MAY NOW VENTURE TO REMOVE TEMPLES

OF HINDU GODS, WHICH THEY THINK WERE NON EXISTENT.A GRAND GAME PLAN IT SEEMS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE EXISTENCE OF RAM
by Harish Padasalgi on Sep 12, 2007 09:51 PM  Permalink
ITS HIGH TIME FOR ALL THE INDIANS TO TEACH THESE LEFTISTS A RIGHT LESSON, AND SEND THIS CONGRESS TO US TO DO THE POLITICS>>>>>>> THEY SHOULD KNOW HOW TO BEHAVE IN INDIA BEFORE ENTERING THIS COUNTRY


SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam
SRI Rama Jayam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
HINDUS PLZZ UNITE!! CALL ME UP AND LET US MAKE A GROUP
by sourabh bhalotia on Sep 12, 2007 09:50 PM  Permalink 

let us all join and awaken the sleeping hindus.

plzz call me up or e-mail me on sourabh_bhalotia@yahoo.com

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115   Older >   >>
Write a message