RE:RE:No Prove of Allah either
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 10:05 PM Permalink
Give me ONE example where Muslims are claiming land/property based on Islamic Beliefs ???
Name One...
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. Birth of Prophet Jesus by his Mother Mary, who was a Virgin, is also a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIMS or Christians should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference. Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
Some people gave me the following issues.
Babri Majid - title deed of the land is in the name of a Muslim trust (Wakf Board)
Qutub Minar - Is a historic site, property of the Nation
Taj Mahal - Is a historic site, property of the Nation
Kashmir - It is a political issue. Just as the NorthEast.
Palestine - The JEWS claim Palestien based on the Torah...The Arabs/Jews/Christians were the INHABITANTS of that land. Whya re JEWS migrating from Europe/Russia/US to Israel ???
RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Jai Tiwaree on Sep 12, 2007 10:48 PM Permalink
The remit of history to include the historian's pre-narrative assumptions and how we translate those assumptions figuratively as we construct our strategies of narrative explanation. Postmodern historians thus ask many fresh questions. Are facts best thought of as events under a description? Is all data ultimately textual and, if so, what are its implications? Should history be written primarily according to literary rules and, if so, what are they? What is the significant difference between literary and figurative speech in history and how does it create historical meaning? How do we distinguish the historical referent of a discourse and its constructed, i.e., its ideological, meaning? Can history ever exist beyond discourse? And the very big question, is history what happened, or what historians tell us happened? All these have to be addressed when we do history, to ignore them is to do only half the job.
RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Mama Biskhot on Sep 12, 2007 10:14 PM Permalink
If the Mosque is given, then other places will be targetted. Anyways u can find Thousands of Temples on roads and footpaths that are illegal. People should stop using these Roads for Traffic and Start these roads for Worship.
RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Veeramani Sanakaralingam on Sep 12, 2007 10:14 PM Permalink
don't play useless religious game on a scheme which will help south india to grow. There is no evidence of ram's existence.
Well, whether the Rama Setu was a man made object or not is not the question. The question is that of the belief of countless Hindus. By destroying the Setu, one would be hurting the sentiments of the majority community. Proof does not exist does not mean events did not occur. What if it is discovered tomorrow that Ramayana was truth by some scientific means. Can the Rama Setu be re built? People in India, who live in places that were on the path of Rama to Lanka believe strobgly that Rama passed through their place and regard it highly. Sometimes, efficiency of the modern age must be given up for the beliefs of people.
RE:Rama Setu
by RC on Sep 12, 2007 10:21 PM Permalink
You have said it properly..but can it not be taken in this way..a project coming over there would give a lot of work to the unorganised labours their daily wages..may be me and you dont have to wrk like that..but there cud be others who would benefit from the project..is it not logical to give some thousands of people two times meal a day rather than belief that there is rams bridge? it would be godly act..wont it be??
Few idiot muslim and Christan indiusals in this forum support Government stand in the name devalopment. Can they support same in case masjids. This is the reason all hindus hate Christans and muslims. Its hindus fiht and yuys need con in the way.
IF CONGRESS by insulting Lord Ram WANTS HINDUS TO TAKE UP ARMS TO DEFEND HINDUISM, ONCE HINDUS DO THAT, FIRST PEOPLE THEY WILL TARGET IS CONGRESS AND LEFTIST POLITICIANS.
RE:IS CONGRESS INCITING HINDUS TOWARDS A CIVIL WAR IN INDIA
by Deepak Bhavnani on Sep 12, 2007 10:09 PM Permalink
THESE CONGRESS B A S T A R D S should realise when Hindus retaliate, they will s c r e w the life of these congress b a s t a r d s
RE:IS CONGRESS INCITING HINDUS TOWARDS A CIVIL WAR IN INDIA
by Veeramani Sanakaralingam on Sep 12, 2007 10:15 PM Permalink
don't play useless religious game on a scheme which will help south india to grow. There is no evidence of ram's existence.
RE:IS CONGRESS INCITING HINDUS TOWARDS A CIVIL WAR IN INDIA
by Putrayasa on Sep 12, 2007 10:10 PM Permalink
Congress is the real and true comunal party. Oust them in the next election.
Is it really worth exchanging our view in this kind of blogs?
By the bye, some of our brothers (practising other religions) say that there is no proof for Ram's existence.
Is there any proof or evidence that Mohd. ascended from the holy mosque in Jerusalem?
Jerusalem, Palestine, etc., is the main dispute between Christians/Jews and Muslims.
Try to understand guys.
Faith (or belief) has no meaning except the meaning which we give to it.
Let's try to respect others' faith (as long as it doesn't kill us).
The bottomline: May be I am wasting my time thinking that my opinon is going to be considered by someone (who has real influence over decision making).
What else can one expect from this govt....Did they ever try to find out where ALLAH was born or is there any evidence that Allah was present somewhere at some point in past.....Kick them out of govt....
RE:RE:I am satisfied
by AP Singh on Sep 12, 2007 10:03 PM Permalink
which is your religion any Mr Karthick. Can u explain who is Brahma, Vishnu or Mahesh. And What is the basis of hindu religion.
RE:I am satisfied
by AP Singh on Sep 12, 2007 10:02 PM Permalink
You will be satisfied. I know. Do u feel satisfied when there is evidence that hindu temples were destroyed and mosques built on them. History prooves that.
RE:I am satisfied
by sourabh bhalotia on Sep 12, 2007 10:03 PM Permalink
contrary to the rapist and looter and terrorist mohammed hindus are peaceful in nature..ur time is coming near for when u will perish.
RE:I am satisfied
by udayam enterprises on Sep 12, 2007 10:03 PM Permalink
What do you think about your nasty Spider and prophet stories? Do you think they are real?? Your so called prophet was just a shrewd businessman with lots of wives!!! Get a life you moron
RE:I am satisfied
by Mayala Fakir on Sep 12, 2007 10:04 PM Permalink
Truth of talking monkeys and bed-time stories are debatable -
But there were certainly 53 year old desert bandits roaming around raping 9 year olds claiming it is the will of Allah!! And that is undeniable truth :)
