The taliban destroyed the Bamiyan buddha statues because they were of no use to them. The UPA and TN governments are destroying the ramer setu because according to them it does not exist. This issue is going to snowball into a major issue and the UPA will get a befitting reply in the elections. In its quest for minority votes, it has started attacking Hindu sentiments in a selfish and shameless way. My appeal to all Hindus is to give the sham secular parties a befitting reply during the elections.
RE:There is no difference between UPA and Taliban
by Mayala Fakir on Sep 12, 2007 10:15 PM Permalink
Yeah, when there are namard shameless opportunitic rice christians exist in South, what else can be expected? You sold your soul and let others rape your way of life for a paltry bag of rice, so you cannot comment on the passion of few who value their culture and religion in high esteem.
RE:There is no difference between UPA and Taliban
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 10:18 PM Permalink
Dumb Ass,
You mean TN by South. BJP is ruling in great Karnataka. Great people from South have started reason in greater Hindu cause instead of South or North.
We, stone Ageies, are going to save you, your family from foreign influences. Otherwise, days are not far away when foreigners with help from thier agents will rule you and destroy everything which you care for.
RE:RE:There is no difference between UPA and Taliban
by vamshidhar reddy on Sep 12, 2007 10:26 PM Permalink
I am sure you are a christian or muslim ...You cannot be such a dumb guy you fool, who said South india means Tamil Nadu..tamil Nadu is neither South nor North..You dont have a damn identity..How can you forget how you uys were born..If you dint Tamilians were the outcome of the Jubliant vanar sena raping the lankan rakshasa women...resulting you mouths and nose curved and stuff
RE:There is no difference between UPA and Taliban
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 10:11 PM Permalink
Hirendra means "Idiot" in Sanskrit ???
Give me ONE example where Muslims are claiming land/property based on Islamic Beliefs ???
Name One...
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. Birth of Prophet Jesus by his Mother Mary, who was a Virgin, is also a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIMS or Christians should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
Some people gave me the following issues.
Babri Majid - title deed of the land is in the name of a Muslim trust (Wakf Board)
Qutub Minar - Is a historic site, property of the Nation
Taj Mahal - Is a historic site, property of the Nation
Kashmir - It is a political issue. Just as the NorthEast.
Palestine - The JEWS claim Palestien based on the Torah...The Arabs/Jews/Christians were the INHABITANTS of that land. Whya re JEWS migrating from Europe/Russia/US to Israel ???
RE:RE:There is no difference between UPA and Taliban
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
Pakistan is the land claimed by muslims on their religious belief
RE:RE:There is no difference between UPA and Taliban
by Mayala Fakir on Sep 12, 2007 10:17 PM Permalink
What the f * c k are you talking ? Did you not hear about Jerusalem conflicts moron? Have you not heard of every f * c k i n g muslim cleric proclaiming that any piece of land under muslim rule belongs to muslim ummah ...haven't you heard that or are you a f * c k i n g ostrich masterbating buried in the sand ?
RE:Wait and see
by Srinivas on Sep 12, 2007 10:12 PM Permalink
Imaran don't teach la and order we have seen muslims like you during blasts in Hyderabad. You guys just kept quite. You guys don't have rights to talk about law and order
Give me ONE example where Muslims are claiming land/property based on Islamic Beliefs ???
Name One...
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. Birth of Prophet Jesus by his Mother Mary, who was a Virgin, is also a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIMS or Christians should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference. Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
Some people gave me the following issues.
Babri Majid - title deed of the land is in the name of a Muslim trust (Wakf Board)
Qutub Minar - Is a historic site, property of the Nation
Taj Mahal - Is a historic site, property of the Nation
Kashmir - It is a political issue. Just as the NorthEast.
Palestine - The JEWS claim Palestien based on the Torah...The Arabs/Jews/Christians were the INHABITANTS of that land. Whya re JEWS migrating from Europe/Russia/US to Israel ???
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by Rediff Blogger on Sep 12, 2007 11:00 PM Permalink
My Dear Friend Imran, Dont you remember that two sects of muslim shiites and Sunni's fought for the claim of Taj Mahal and you agree it is a national property? If Kashmir is a political issue, why do the muslims and hindus fight there. Shouldnt it be a fight only between pakistanis and Indians and not based on religion. Why is there always muslim terrorist all over the world and not any other religion as famous as muslims. If everything is based on beleif then India is called Hindustan means land of Hindus, why did the muslims come and occupy? Is killing others and occupying others land is your beleif?
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:09 PM Permalink
Pakistan is the land claimed by muslims on their religious belief
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
Creation of Pakistan was un-Islamic. It was a MISTAKE. It was an example of Political Greed.
I do not claim pakistan to be a Muslim Country, because it is NOT.
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:17 PM Permalink
This show you are ignorant. It was created for muslims based on their religious belief and even bangladesh. Don't say pakistan is not muslim country it is called Islamic republic of pakistan (FYI). Better get educated
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by arun kumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:25 PM Permalink
muslim babler.muslims are killing people in kashmir,bangladesh ,pakistaan in the name of allah and islamm and u r saying they are not taking lands in religions name...what are u a m...f? and moderate hindus are those which join communists and traitors.
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by Mario Rozario on Sep 12, 2007 10:21 PM Permalink
Religions argue over petty things all the time. Hindu's aren't the only ones.
The example quoted above is perfect - Moslems want the Entire state of Palestine for themselves (with or without the Jews). The question of Palestine's accession to either Jews or Arabs is still an open question and is difficult to be decided. The Jews were sacked from their city in 200AD when Emperor Titus sacked Jerusalem after the uprising and scattered them across the Globe. Thats why they always consider Israel as home (although many of them now have the US as home).
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by Sampat Kumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:34 PM Permalink
Muslims should surrender all the properties of Masjids and thousands of properties occupied and grabbed in the name of Madrassas. In Mumbai alone there are thousands of illegal Madrassas in tha slums claimed by fruadulent means in the name of religion. Go and see Hindu monuments at Qutub Minar site. Go & see the battles being faught almost everyday by Muslims & Christians to claim their religious site at Jeruslem.
RE:Where are the MODERATE Hindus Now ???
by Mayala Fakir on Sep 12, 2007 10:21 PM Permalink
You are a f * C K I N G ostrich masterbating buried under the sand...
The Government would not the same thing about allah or Christ. The main reason is Hindus do not count as a vote bank. The remedy is Hindus have to unite and form a strong vote bank.
RE:RE:Existence of Lord Ram
by samir mehta on Sep 12, 2007 10:10 PM Permalink
The Government would not say the same thing about Allah or Christ. The main reason is Hindus do not count as a vote bank. rkbxHindus have to unite and form a vote bank.
RE:Existence of Lord Ram
by Veeramani Sanakaralingam on Sep 12, 2007 10:10 PM Permalink
don't play useless religious game on a scheme which will help south india to grow. There is no evidence of ram's existence.
RE:RE:Existence of Lord Ram
by samir mehta on Sep 12, 2007 10:18 PM Permalink
There is no evidence for existence of Allah or Christ. Then why is the Govt. spending more than 250 crores every year for Haj pilgrimage which is ordered by Allah according to mohmad. Whole of India will grow much faster if Govt stops this Mullah-oriented attittude.
RE:Existence of Lord Ram
by arun kumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:29 PM Permalink
is there any evidance of ur father existance or u come out when crist fckd ur moma like mother marry
RE:Existence of Lord Ram
by RC on Sep 12, 2007 10:14 PM Permalink
Why do u rake in the thing of hindu muslim or christian...the so called hindu religion as per wat u say is existing for long time..why do u need to unite now...and unite against what...wats ur objective of uniting all the hindus world over..
RE:RE:Existence of Lord Ram
by samir mehta on Sep 12, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
As already mentioned, the reason for Hindus to unite is to form a vote bank, so that the Govt does not play with religious sentiments of Hindus.
The time has come for this govt. The govt can last no longer now. It may stay for a while but it will have a big downfall. There is no evidence of god either. They might turn this country into an atheist one some day.
RE:Vinash kalya Viprit budhi
by Veeramani Sanakaralingam on Sep 12, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
don't play useless religious game on a scheme which will help south india to grow. There is no evidence of ram's existence.
RE:RE:Vinash kalya Viprit budhi
by RC on Sep 12, 2007 10:16 PM Permalink
India is a free country...why would govt coerce u become an atheist...do u really think govt would be doing that???
I do not understand, why we are talking rubbuish here. ASI is said in document that the bridge is NOT MAN Made, and it is certain, Ram setu was not built by man, it was built by GOD, here is the differnce. ASI is all full of "man", they are far from understanding of GOD. Forgive them
Most of the Hindus in India are psudo secular and they are attacking Hinduism. For them its easy and they will get applause from others.
Its not far that the Hindus will be cornered in India and all the Hindu faith will be removed.
After submissive to thousand years of Islamic agression and suffering all the atrocities still majority of Hindus ( most of them are psudo seculars) are puppetting "Islam is a religion of Peace".
RE:Dushta Sikshana ! Dharma Rakshna !!
by Jai Tiwaree on Sep 12, 2007 10:48 PM Permalink
The remit of history to include the historian's pre-narrative assumptions and how we translate those assumptions figuratively as we construct our strategies of narrative explanation. Postmodern historians thus ask many fresh questions. Are facts best thought of as events under a description? Is all data ultimately textual and, if so, what are its implications? Should history be written primarily according to literary rules and, if so, what are they? What is the significant difference between literary and figurative speech in history and how does it create historical meaning? How do we distinguish the historical referent of a discourse and its constructed, i.e., its ideological, meaning? Can history ever exist beyond discourse? And the very big question, is history what happened, or what historians tell us happened? All these have to be addressed when we do history, to ignore them is to do only half the job.
