RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 10:23 PM Permalink
Some Dumb Asses have made this North-South issue.
Dummies, your Baap, ASI has given their decision on the existance of Rama and Ramayana. Who the hell government to decide on religious beliefs of billions of people? Do they decide religious discussions in other faiths? Their hypocrisy and insensitivity is the core issue.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by kskumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
I see from your posts that you are a faithful follower of Karunanidhi and his selective aethist ideas and other related rubbish. What will the Government lose if the canal is rerouted? Saying that there is no evidence for Ram and Ramayana is not the issue. One can give innumerable examples from other religious scriptures to question the very faith of those religions. The point here is whether the Government will respect the sentiments expressed and agree to reroute the canal. This it is unwilling to do for fear of antagonizing MK, the Senile Old Man of the South, who is bent upon humiliating Hindu beliefs as much as possible. And with people like you to support him, he may well succeed.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by Arun karthick on Sep 12, 2007 10:24 PM Permalink
The main reason for this project is. 1.to reduce the travel time of ships and not focus on revenues to india. 2.If it is rerouted the main objective of this project will be affected.
no one will use it and it will be a big failure.
As i am tamil,i know the value of this project.
i have went many times to rameshwaram and seen this bridge ,than u guys.
RE:RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:26 PM Permalink
but TN is India's property so Indian's has right to comment and express their views. Dont get irritated as if it is your personal hard earning.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by kskumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:30 PM Permalink
By your reasoning the Qutb Minar is the property of Delhi, Taj Mahal that of the UP etc. You think only of the Revenue. What about the fishermen whose livelihood is at stake? And the bridge acted like a breakwater during the tsunami of 2004. Fianally, I am a Tamil too, so don't give me that rubbish.
Please check the facts on rerouting before concluding that the main objective of the project will be affected. There are 6 alignments which can be used for the project and 2 of them will have no impact on Ram sethu and may be cost effective as it reduces the distance as well.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by manoj on Sep 12, 2007 10:24 PM Permalink
Karunanidhi is supported by more than hindu tamilians so son't under estimate the intelligence of this literate people.
So if you northie wants us to believe some cooked up story then you have to give convincing evidence no stupid street protests
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:25 PM Permalink
Mr Arun all these people want to see the bridge that is the reason why they asking to leave the bridge alone. Hope you understand now.
I think we should appriciate the govt. They rather thinking about the loosing votes of majority, thinking about the devlopment of country. What good can a bridge do to India?
RE:Congress is doing right thing
by vamshidhar reddy on Sep 12, 2007 10:15 PM Permalink
You Dumb Ass!!!Would any muslim have accepted this had they built something on their faoth belifs..Its because of people like you taht Hindus are loosing their importance.This is a christian govt,henceforth such bad results
RE:HINDUS, LET'S TAKE OUR OUTRAGE TO THE STREETS NOW
by Arun karthick on Sep 12, 2007 10:12 PM Permalink
show them we are as bad and illetrate as muslims are.
RE:HINDUS, LET'S TAKE OUR OUTRAGE TO THE STREETS NOW
by AP Singh on Sep 12, 2007 10:15 PM Permalink
We are not bad as muslims are. We are not stupid as you are
the same govt protected the qutub minar and changed the delhi metro rail route. the qutub minar built from the stones of a hindu temple. the same govt protected the Taj mahal from the widening of the Taj corridor. the same Govt banned the movie da vinci code because Christians would feel bad. this same govt now has the guts to question Ram and his existence and our faith. and say no proof to show he existed. then want to destroy the bridge which will directly imply that they beleive HE never existed. what kind of communal bias is this and they call themselves secular. and whoever supports Ram or talks against this govt is called Communal and Fascist etc. what double standards are these.come on people realise those who call themselves secular are not really secular. look through the media bias , touch your heart and ask are they secular . keep the above examples in mind.
RE:Bias!
by mahendra sapa on Sep 12, 2007 10:21 PM Permalink
It's time for this politicians to be moved to Hell (because Heaven won't accept them). We have a lesson to be learned from muslim extremist.
RE:Bias!
by Sirach B on Sep 12, 2007 10:24 PM Permalink
Sid, "Ram and his existence and our faith"
You mentioned Govt is questioning the Lord Ram's Existence, its not correct. Its all about the Bridge and Historical Evidence for it.No Govt in the world can provide the Evidence to the God, because simply its not possible.The faith in God is a personal belief.
There is Mohamed Anwar Sadat says in this form that he is satisfied with Government stand. Go and ask you sisters whether they are satisfied with Hindus
Supreme court has given good tight slap on the face of Praveen Togadia by stating that there was no historical evidence to establish the existence of Lord Ram or the other characters in Ramayana. So Mr. Togadia stop all these political stunts and do not come in the way of development of India. Few people like you are taking india backwards instead making INDIA SHINING.
RE:INDIA SHINING
by Mayala Fakir on Sep 12, 2007 10:12 PM Permalink
Did you take your mental medicine today? If not, ayyo, go and take it appa ...you can lose even that remaining sense.
RE:RE:INDIA SHINING
by sourabh bhalotia on Sep 12, 2007 10:18 PM Permalink
u just have the name of shri krishna..but u seem to be a jehadi or missionary.. u have lost ur senses and u seem to have been searching for ur own identity..praveen bhai togadia is not fighting for his selfish achievments!he himself is capable of earning a lot since he is a very capable cancer surgeon. he is fighting for fools like u aroung and in our country
RE:INDIA SHINING
by Deepak Bhavnani on Sep 12, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
well,Qaaba is coming in the way of mental development of Muslims so let's demilish it
Vatican is a site of child rapist priests so let's demolish Vatican
RE:INDIA SHINING
by slicktiger on Sep 12, 2007 10:19 PM Permalink
Mr. Shrikrishna , We want Development of India not Srilanka . This is not Togadia issue btw .This is about faith !
RE:INDIA SHINING
by kskumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
What development? You mean to say this development will not come about if you reroute the canal from the present route? MK, the Senile Old Man of the south, will do anything to ridicule the Hindus. Sonia will do anything to please him. Does this make it clear why the Centre and MK are hell bent on the project?
RE:INDIA SHINING
by AP Singh on Sep 12, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
The apex had earlier given a decision not to damage 35km long bridge. It Was a tight slap on your face. On one side it was, Wait another one is coming.
