muslim community in india had been arguing that islamic fundamentalists , extremists, terrorists are a minority in their community.....a minority within an minority.....they are minority anyway......so our peudo secularists has to appease them.....will pass an bill guaranteeing reservation for these minority within an minority.....our politicians love minority......hail secularism of india......
RE:sleepless cell
by Raja Thakur on Sep 02, 2007 05:01 PM Permalink
You are sick. People like you have done more damage to India than the others. So called patriots and dont sing National Anthem in their meetings. Ha!. Myabe they are still living in the times of British Raj, which they never wanted to end.
Probably India is the only country, whichnever learns a lesson from its past experiences. Why Indians never realise the realities behind the Islamic Terrorism. Muslims are loyal to Islam and Islamic land only. They never treat the Non Islamic land as their mother land, though they born and die there only. They feel it is their pious duty to convert all non islamic land into an Islamic land. It is the only reason for the spreading of Islamic terrorism. They spread violance before 1947 and got pakistan and thrown out all non Islamic minorities from Pak and Bangladesh. They spread violance in the entire India wherever they have considerable strength. Inspite of curbing their fanatism we are after them to prove our selves as more and more secular, thus digging our own grave. Do we ever find any single instance of communal harmony wherever the Muslims are in majority or in commandable strength. Muslims never allow any rights to other communities wherever they are in majority and would never satisfy with any number of rights given to them wherever they are in minority. The people of other countries realise the reality and taking all steps to face Muslims' attrocities. But we are still blind not to recognise the barbarianism of Muslims though we have been suffering since the days of Allauddin Qilgi's invasion over our mother land. As long as we are passionate of secularism, we have to face so many such incidents of Hyderabad, Godra, Kashmir atrocities. Oneday we ahve to loose to P
RE:RE:Islamic Terrorism
by Attract Ivist on Sep 02, 2007 05:00 PM Permalink
well, monirity doesnt mean that they are above law, nor do they enjoy any special status. Govt just make sure that there is no discrimination against them.
Congress's muslim appeasement policy is a different story.
Indian society has been plagued by two major types of violence. One is that related to the sectarian one, the one which began with Jablapur riots of 1961, which intensified greatly during the decades of 1980s, the one which gradually assumed the shape of pogrom like the ones of 1984 (Delhi), 1992-3 (Mumbai) and Gujarat (2002). The two latter one of these also showed that lot of organization and planning is being put in to the same. In the context of the punishments being pronounced in the Mumbai blast cases, the demand resurfaced that even the guilty of 1992-93 carnage should also be punished. Just to recall after these riots this Commission worked painstakingly for five years and came to various conclusions and also named those who were guilty of violation of laws due to which the violence took such horrendous shape.
The violence which looked to be spontaneous was investigated by sitting judge Shrikrishna, who after five years of painstaking investigation concluded many a things relating to violence and blasts. About the spread of violence it put the square blame on the failure of police machinery, the role of provocative writings in Shiv Sena paper Saamana and another paper Navakaal, and the role played by Shiv Sena-BJP as a whole, Shiv Sena had later started Maha Aarti, which was meant to mobilize people and give provocation to them. "The Maha Artis were started from 26th December 1992 and kept adding to the communal tension and endangering the fragile peace which had b
RE:Active Cell
by Rahul Punjabi on Sep 02, 2007 05:06 PM Permalink
Two incidents you forgot to mention. 1. The Fanatism behind partion of India in 1947 and total cleansing of minorities from Muslim areas of Indian subcontinent 2. 1989 started Islamic cleansing of minorities from Kashmir Valley.
These are two major incidents from India but nobody dares to say anything about it. These two incidents are not isolated ones but are part of International Islamic propaganda and political agenda. Shariat law can never treat non-muslims equally. Its in its inception. Otherwise Why do not the muslims say something about the suppression of rights of non-muslims in Islamic countries? According to Sharia is a muslim leaves his faith then its apostacy but Muslims want the right of converting others elsewhere. How can this be said as a religious practice? It pure political agenda.
Our country badly needs a uniform civil code. People of different religions may follow their religion within their homes and places of worship. But when they are on the streets, they must be regarded as plain Indians. No veils (Burqa) should be allowed in public places for security reasons. If muslims are backward, it is their own fault. There are very rich muslims in India and very poor people of other faiths as well. They (Muslims) are more interested in Madarsa education which is irrelevant in current times. Hardworking taxpayers money must not be gives in alms to useless retrograde persons of any religion. Muslims must condemn all acts of terrorism. They never protest or demonstrate when hindus are killed in blasts but resort to violence immediately when muslims are killed. They do not protest when MF Hussain portrays Bharat Mata in nude but a cartoon in a foreign country is enough excuse for them to take to streets and damage our national property. They support Iran which went back on its agreement to suply gas at a mutually agreed upon price. This gas could have been used by muslims too. Our muslims are very eager to prove to outside muslim world ( which cares two hoots for them) that they are with them. Arab muslims do not take Muslims of Indian sub-continent seriously as these muslims were all Hindus and were converted to Islam by force. If they could not even resist the outsider invaders and surrendered easily then they are not worthy of any identity.
RE:Uniform civil code
by Rahul Punjabi on Sep 02, 2007 05:11 PM Permalink
Are you ready to become Hindu again if we say that you can be Hindu without caste?
RE:Uniform civil code
by Attract Ivist on Sep 02, 2007 05:19 PM Permalink
Who r u to decide when will u talk about uniform civil code?
There can be no special treatment for a religion, after all muslims r not the only minorities in india. therefore we need a unifrom civil code.
You get out the barbaric practises mentioned in a 10,000 yr old book. Before removing the brahmins from Temples, why dont u try shaving all maulvis in ur mosques?
RE:Uniform civil code
by Ali boy on Sep 02, 2007 05:32 PM Permalink
i shave my regularly what i can say about someone else beard...it is upto the moulvi to shave there beard...if they dont what can i do. Do you see any comparision between a caste system and shaving the beard of a moulvi??:)
The home minister stated that there are over 100 terrorist camps operating out of Bangladesh. The government know that the terrorist network is shifting from the west to our eastern borders. But then, why the Indian government is not taking adequate steps to meet that challenge?.
Cross-border smuggling from Bangladesh has been a sticky issue for the Union home ministry. While several intelligence inputs point to Bangladesh having emerged as a safe heaven for terrorists, very little action has been taken on the ground to seal the border.
RE:UPA - USELESS PROGRESSIVE ANTI-INDIANS
by MOHAN on Sep 02, 2007 04:57 PM Permalink
We are uniting with Italy...not with Porkis, Bhikaris and Chindis....
RE:UPA - USELESS PROGRESSIVE ANTI-INDIANS
by Ali boy on Sep 02, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
we dont believe in pre-emptive strikes. Our agencies must act on the policy of pre-emptive response to all the enemies of our nation. Little bit policy change is required we are not living in india of 50 years back and we dont have to carry the policy of non-interference with other countries who harbour our enemies
RE:UPA - USELESS PROGRESSIVE ANTI-INDIANS
by Rajeev Khare on Sep 02, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
UPA means UTTERLY POLLUTING ANTI-NATIONALS. They are aiding the terrorists and providing them all the help they need. Even the US has failed to notice that. The UPA govt wants 123 agreement to arm Islamists with nuclear warheads rather than helping India secure its energy needs. As a matter of fact 123 is really needed by India.
The terrorist activities should be dealth with brutal force, pump in all state machinery to deal such menace, we the people of India is ready to contribute a percentage of income to the government, if needed. Inform all the suspicious movements and actions of people in your area to the police, kill all the armed insurgents, otherwise they will kill you, your kith and kin. Their ultimate aim is the total distruction of our mother land. They will compare Israel, palestine, Iran to white wash their antinational activities. They have lot of money with them, do any body seen any news which shows these people contribute any thing for the beeterment of the people they represent , no, they cant. They use the money to kill others.KILL ALL THE ARMED INSURGENTS. Jai Hind
