Indian politics is now being transformed into a "viraasat"...!!! How else can you explain Rahul's initiation into the Congress mainstream..???
Politics is about "able proven and capable leaders".... It definitely is not about "Viraasat"... Indians have always followed the "herd mentality" by refusing to analyse what is happening....
Sonia is a foreigner and even if she is married an Indian, she CANNOT fall PERFECTLY in sync with the Indian culture.... It is clear that she will never be appointed as the PM... So her best bet is to SOMEHOW push Rahul to the supreme seat of the country politics...
Rahul has to be evaluated on his contribution to the country politics and NOT on his GENES... This is the most stupid thing that we Indians can do...
And Rahul challenging Modi in Gujarat..??? It is a big joke... because Gujaratis clearly know what the Congress has been and what Modi has done for Gujarat.... Rahul will miserably flop in Gujarat and again Congress will find some fault in the "organising committee" rather than accepting that it has tried to "cash in" on the Gandhi lineage.... Never forget that....
RE:Prevent ''Viraasat'' in Indian Politics.... Dont support Rahul..!!!!
by Hemant on Oct 30, 2007 07:48 PM Permalink
All over India, Congra-ass, could not find one fit and able leader. They are sucking Ghandy's .....
According to Dictionary Terrorist = somebody who uses violence, especially killing innocents, and doing assassination.
A) Now are those Hindus not terrorist, who have killed more than 2000 innocent people in Gujrat, who were living a common life like us.
B) TIGER Group in Sri Lanka who kills so many innocent people. Are they from Muslim community?
C) Are the Naxalite Group belongs to Muslim Community? Was Veerappan a Muslim?
D) Was Hitler a Muslim.
E) Was there any Muslim Country involved in World War I and II?
F) Goudse who killed Gandhiji, father of the nation. Was Goudse a Muslim?
G) The group who killed Rajiv Gandhi in suicide attack. Was that group belong to Muslim Community
H) Baghat Singh was a Number one Terrorist according to British. Was he a Muslim? I from my side beleive that Shaheed Bhaghat Singh was a freedom fighter.
I) I know that there many attacks recently done by Muslim Groups(As said by Media without any authentic proof). I don't need to mention them because Media is always there to Blame Islam for each and every wrong things happening around.
Noteworthy is most of the people about whom I mentioned above belongs to Hindu Community. So shall we start saying that Hindus are terrorist.
If anybody says that Hindus are terrorist are Idiots and those who says that Muslims are terrorist are Idiots as well. There are blacksheeps in every community. But don't blame the whole community for those blanksheeps.
RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Hemant on Oct 30, 2007 07:49 PM Permalink
why you have stopped there, continue the list, Ghazni, Babar, Akbar, Aurangajeb........all are terrorists.
RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Jeevan on Oct 30, 2007 07:50 PM Permalink
I am not anti Hindu, but can not tolerate when stupid Brahmins boast about there ancestors who ruled the village. Their contribution to the society is nothing. The present state of India is purely due to the so called "upper caste" lack of courage. They should accept this and have no right to blame the under privileged.
RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Hemant on Oct 30, 2007 08:00 PM Permalink
Jeevan, If you are not anti Hindu, then read the history properly. Brahmins, never ruled this country, in any part. By the way, I'm not Brahmin for your information. Lower caste people should get hold of the opportunity, educate themselves and comeup inlife. Don't read the book, only to get pass mark. If you get only pass mark, you think you can better your life.
RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Vas on Oct 30, 2007 09:24 PM Permalink
Moron, upper-castes include kshatriyas and Vaisyas, not just brahmins. Overwhelming Majority of politicians in India are OBC, including Modi and Laloo! Take your pick.
RE:RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Vikas on Oct 30, 2007 07:55 PM Permalink
U should support Narendra Modi because he is not a brahmin, he is an OBC.
RE:RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Vas on Oct 30, 2007 09:31 PM Permalink
Because majority of mutt heads are from castes that are actually responsible for abusing the dalits, but will pin the blame on brahmins, who don't even live there. The main exmple is TN, where I have witnessed mistreatment of dalits by MBC and OBCS, including by MK's caste, in rural areas and the blame was deliberately pinned on brahmins who don't even live in those villages. As an SC myself living in the west, I find that nauseating and cruel! How can the country/soceity reform if the perpetrators of all the crime are pinning the blame on some other group that are not responsible? No wonder nothing changes! Each time Karunanidh's community abuses a dalit, he shamelessly tries to detract from the issue by blaming the Brahmins. It is like pinning the muslim terrorists acts on jews or africans. It is ridiculous and pathetic!
RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Arvind Singh on Oct 30, 2007 08:14 PM Permalink
You forgot to Add Laloo (Yadav), Mulla Mulayam Singh, Bahenji, Buta Singh, Sharad Yadav, Yashwant Sinha, Jaswant Singh, Nitish Kumar...
RE:RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Arvind Singh on Oct 30, 2007 08:26 PM Permalink
Brahmins never rule any village, its always Kshetriya who ruled a village or country, A kshetriya may be from OBC listed today or of a caste which doesnot have any poors and they donot come under the caste list of Other Backward Classes which also has a economic income tag of Rs 1 Lakh or below per annum (Only Braahmins, ruling clan castes are excluded from the list as they always had better educational facilities if not brain & wealth). My ancestors were Jamindars, they ruled the village that time he used to give some money and food to brahmins in the village who were not well off economically, but today each and every member of that brahmin family has jobs even though they are not good at teaching since they have edn they have jobs, they are now the most richest family and the Jamindar family after their land was snatched also became poor, so who is the looser. Brahmins gained more after Independence and job kind of scenarios offered by govt. before that they were poor and were offered food & money during family functions, that was there bread and butter. ....
RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by LION on Oct 30, 2007 07:58 PM Permalink
Hi Hemant. Thanks. Atleast you have got me right. I clearly mentioned that even Muslims have killed innocents. But it is 100% to say that only Muslims do act of terror. I just wanted to proclaim that other community people have done as well.
Regarding Muslims who have done the act of terror. Let me tell you that they are not at True Muslims. Because a true muslim will not kill a single innocent person. As mentioned in Quran "If a person kills one innocent, he will punished like as if he has killed the whole man kind".
Please don't go to Dangerious websites which are against Islam. They are proclaiming Islam in a very wrong way. Any question you have, you can post it on www.irf.net www.islamhelpline.com www.islamQ&a.com
RE:RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by Hemant on Oct 30, 2007 08:03 PM Permalink
Lion, I don't see every muslim as terrorist or a terror supporter. By the way I don't read any malicious web literature.
RE:RE:RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by LION on Oct 30, 2007 08:02 PM Permalink
I don't know why you people try to misunderstand the message. Did I tell that there is no Muslim Terror Group. My message was whether "All the terror that had happened, Are only Muslims behind that"?
RE:RE:Are all Terrorist are Muslims?
by LION on Oct 30, 2007 08:04 PM Permalink
Hi Vikas. I don't know why you people try to misunderstand the message. Did I tell that there is no Muslim Terror Group. My message was whether "All the terror that had happened, Are only Muslims behind that"?
RE:Beware......another anti Hindu
by Jeevan on Oct 30, 2007 07:49 PM Permalink
am not anti Hindu, but can not tolerate when stupid Brahmins boast about there ancestors who ruled the village. Their contribution to the society is nothing. The present state of India is purely due to the so called "upper caste" lack of courage. They should accept this and have no right to blame the under privileged.
RE:RE:Beware......another anti Hindu
by Hemant on Oct 30, 2007 07:52 PM Permalink
If you are not anti Hindu, then read the history properly. Brahmins, never ruled this country, in any part. By the way, I'm not Brahmin for your information.DDp
RE:Beware......another anti Hindu
by Jeevan on Oct 30, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
I am not just talking anout the vegge Bharmins ... it is true about any so called "upper caste". The have no right to blame the sc/ST/OBC for India's present state. The uppercaste did not have courage to rule so we suffered. This is just the fact and you accept it.
RE:RE:Beware......another anti Hindu
by Vas on Oct 30, 2007 09:37 PM Permalink
Maybe if you turned 'veggie' instead of drinking the blood of christ everyday, you'd be able to comprehend things better and study the real history with greater understanding, instead of the farting out the propaganda cooked up by your missionary fathers who art in heaven.
RE:Beware......another anti Hindu
by Vas on Oct 30, 2007 09:34 PM Permalink
Of course, this 'Jeevan' character is a converted christo. You can make out by his 'feigned' righteousness and twisting of facts to pick on hindu communities to create communal disharmony. How much this bugger is paid by his white masters is anybody's guess!
According to Dictionary Terrorist = somebody who uses violence, especially killing innocents, and doing assassination.
A) Now are those Hindus not terrorist, who have killed more than 2000 innocent people in Gujrat, who were living a common life like us.
B) TIGER Group in Sri Lanka who kills so many innocent people. Are they from Muslim community?
C) Are the Naxalite Group belongs to Muslim Community? Was Veerappan a Muslim?
D) Was Hitler a Muslim.
E) Was there any Muslim Country involved in World War I and II?
F) Goudse who killed Gandhiji, father of the nation. Was Goudse a Muslim?
G) The group who killed Rajiv Gandhi in suicide attack. Was that group belong to Muslim Community
H) Baghat Singh was a Number one Terrorist according to British. Was he a Muslim? I from my side beleive that Shaheed Bhaghat Singh was a freedom fighter.
I) I know that there many attacks recently done by Muslim Groups(As said by Media without any authentic proof). I don't need to mention them because Media is always there to Blame Islam for each and every wrong things happening around.
Noteworthy is most of the people about whom I mentioned above belongs to Hindu Community. So shall we start saying that Hindus are terrorist.
If anybody says that Hindus are terrorist are Idiots and those who says that Muslims are terrorist are Idiots as well. There are blacksheeps in every community. But don't blame the whole community for those blanksheeps.
RE:The saying
by AG B on Oct 30, 2007 08:15 PM Permalink
Mullah LION, A. Was an answer to the Muslim goons who torched the sabarmati express B. LTTE are also terrorists. However they dont bother about Hindus killed in India or elsewhere whereas you lot will kil evenif some newspaper publishes cartoons OR some dictator in Iraq is hanged. C. Reason as B. They do it only for their own sake. D.Wish there was a Hindustani leader like Hitler to decimate the Mullahs E.Which Muslim country is civilized enough to be aspired for ? FYI - Rich oil sheikhdoms doesnt reflect civilization F. Gandhiji dies due to Muslims. Islamic filth doesnt contribute anything constructive to any country. G. Its LTTE and was a response to IPKF. Eventhough they are terrorists atleast they have a motive. Its not madness like you guys H. This is why U guys dont belong to any country. We, Hindustanis, treat Bhagat Singh as martyr still u guys r able to see him as different. Blood traitors!! I. All muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims. Its an universla truth experienced by all "civilized" countries. We pray for a Hindu dictator comes and hangs these political leaders. once these politicians go you lot will be shown your place in society.
If Modi is a terrorist... then what do you say about the Sikh massacare as a result of Indira Gandhi's assasination... What do you say about the thousands of Pandits who were massacared in Kashmir and then forced to leave Kashmir and now are living their lives in miserable conditions...
Dont become biased because Modi has the guts to stand up and develop Gujarat...
I have stayed in Gujarat and out of it... And I find Gujarat (of today) miles ahead in terms of "quality of life", "safety of my family" and "equal opportunity"....
And NEVER forget... Media is now not what you perceive it to be... It is a mere political mouthpiece... It is only concerned with its TRP ratings (how else would you justify their showing mutilated bodies, ridiculous news like a bull going bersek, heinous crimes like murder, kidnapping, encounters etc. without censoring).... Media persons like Karan Thapar are just pretending to be secular... Ask them about their flamboyant lifestyles, foreign college educated children, Page 3 parties that they indulge in... How much have the media done to increase the quality of life of a common man..?????
Dont be swayed by a pseudo secular party like Congress, which boasts of some of the most corrupt leaders (remember Bofors) and some of the most murderous criminal turned politicians....!!!!!
RE:Modi is good for Gujarat..!!!! Rahul will miserably flop..!!!!
by Arvind Singh on Oct 30, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
Agreed on each and every point...
Every other party is afraid of BJP commitment to the country's development, the feel ground is slipping under their feet that why they have all ganged up against the Nationalist Party. A riot under BJP regime (only the first one) is being propogated as state sponsered to tarnish its image, all other riots like 1984 riots where the burnt each and every sikh and created so much of terror that they went for haircuts overnight is forgotten and declared to be cool reaction of congress supporters, but were those sikhs killed were innocent human being, no since the central govt. sponsered it. The congress is hell bent upon to be in chair of power by hook or crook, they want to try everything on this earth to keep BJP away from govering as they have been showing to the people what real governance is, how much a govt can do welfare of the subjects they are governing. The congress has been made small and exposed how they really fooled people by dyanastic rule. Isn't the Congress party is short of democratic procedure, anyone raising head like Rajesh Pilot, Madhav Rao, PVN were sidelined and killed, though they all appear as accident, real stories can never be known, one can always hire driver & pilots like suicide bombers.. Any what good this Kashmiri-Pandit dyansty has done to India except looting it.
The capacity of Rahul Gandhi was pretty clear from the election results of UP. Ofcourse, the explanation given later was that the Congress did not have a proper organisation in UP.
