RE:Beware of Dewegoudaa...he is very clever...
by ASHIM MUKHERJEE on Oct 28, 2007 09:15 PM Permalink
after all he was p.m. of k'ntka and c.m. of indiac
RE:Devegowda is gone which is atleast good
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:09 PM Permalink
yes include congress at national level then only it is good for the nation.(remember whenever congress is in power this things will happen remember goa jharkhand bihar all in this tenure itself.)
RE:Devegowda is gone which is atleast good
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:23 PM Permalink
no ajith.It is BSP which made in UP and BJP is the affected party.
RE:Devegowda is gone which is atleast good
by JAYARAM SHETTY on Oct 28, 2007 08:41 PM Permalink
DEVEGOWDA IS A CURSE FOR kARNATAKA.CHEAP, CORRUPT, DOES NOT HAVE ANY POLICY OTHERTHAN TO SURVIVE FOR HIMSELF AND HIS FAMILY, REST ALL HIPOCRACY. PRAY GOD TO GET RID OF HIM FROM THE POLITICS SETTY
India ought to follow the system practiced in some european nations, where instead of a no-confidence motion or its equivalent, a confidence motion in another party / group is moved in the legislature. this way, pulling down of elected governments with no clear alternative is avoided.
RE:Karnataka politics
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:24 PM Permalink
whether we need this system.instead we can turn to presidential form of govt with fixed term.no election expenses.No gubernational posts like dummy president and decorative governors
RE:RE:Karnataka politics
by ASHIM MUKHERJEE on Oct 28, 2007 09:22 PM Permalink
it should be all party government with proportionate representation of political parties. p.m./c.m. should be directly elected by public. may not be good for politicians but for the nation and we indians
China is always major treat for India and other democracies like United States, Japan. China can not be a friend of India. China is helping Pakistan against us. Same way we have to help Taiwan against them. Chinese are occupied Tibet. Now, we have to take U turn in our foreign policy. We need shake hand with US and its NATO allies. We also need to support Tibet for their freedom straggle nevertheless we have to take step for merger of Tibet in our democratic republic.
RE:Tibet
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:07 PM Permalink
yes take stand in tibet like that of bangladesh and palestine.Also follow the same in sri lanka.have a uniform foreign policy.Dont have different foreign policies like one for islamic countries and other for non islamic countries
Situation in Karnataka shows how opportunistic our political parties are .Governor should take stock of overall situation and dissolve assembly immediately and call for immediate elections .
RE:Opportunistic ploitics
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:03 PM Permalink
yes dissolve the assembly and recover the cost of election from congress bjp and jds.Otherwise implement president rule and conduct elections only after 20 months ie in the due date of elections
RE:Opportunistic ploitics
by DragFlicker on Oct 28, 2007 08:13 PM Permalink
Dont worry. His excellency, Karnataka Goverrnor is waiting for the signal from China. Anyway, he will take the decision which suites to his masters. Afterall he is nothing but a watchdog from 10, Janapath
The true meaning of being democratic has been forgotten. It really needs a revolution %u2026 according to me a new rule has to be laid in the constitution in which basic qualification has to be laid for becoming a politician. These uneducated fools holding the power in their hand can never ever bring a bright future for INDIA. I feel a new party has to be formed in which these old bull having money hunger should never be admitted. Instead young generation should be given the opportunity to rule the country%u2026 then can we witness a birth of a new nation.
RE:Democracy needs revolution: By Dr.Niaz Sattar
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:14 PM Permalink
democracy is turned as vote bank polictics.turned as minority appeasement.turned as reservation raj. we have enough population to hold these posts.So bar individuals from any post more than once.
RE:Dissolve the assembly
by slicktiger on Oct 28, 2007 06:54 PM Permalink
actually every party agrees that in India there cannot be one pary winning majority in the elections any more.and everyone believes that this is the genre of coaliation governments. Then why can't people choose which coaliation wins majority? Announce the coaliations before contesting for elections. let people choose which flock or herd can rule them.what do you say?
RE:Dissolve the assembly
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:16 PM Permalink
remember what congress does for moraji desai and charan singh.remember what congress done to deve gowda and gujral.same way ban congress and not allow it to contest parliment elections
RE:Dissolve the assembly
by VASUDEVAN VM on Oct 28, 2007 07:41 PM Permalink
If congress not supported any of these would not have been the Prime Minster of India. Even for a day they occupied the Prime Minister's Chair it was only because of Congress not with their own party. They must be thanksful to the Congress in their whole life and if any rebirth. If congress no supported do you think Deva Gowda or Charan Singh or Gujral (with their megre 50-60 MPs in the Parliament will become Prime Minister. Instead of thnaking they are cursing the Congress, the shameless creatures. People see that congress withdrew the support, they never said that congress only helped them to become Prime Minister.
RE:RE:Dissolve the assembly
by R Rajendran on Oct 28, 2007 10:37 PM Permalink
You are telling as if Congress has given away its ancestral property to others.Its Congress's manipulative mentality throwing away any semblance of ethics it would have, for promoting its personal enrichment of pockets that balaji is pointing out
RE:Dissolve the assembly
by AJ on Oct 28, 2007 06:57 PM Permalink
This will be best possible thing... if it happens. Sick of Devegowda and his F**king family
These whole scenario in Karnataka Politics seems to a movie. No body doesn't have any moral values or any ethics. They are playing with Indian democracy. Hand this all bloody politicians.
RE:hungry for power
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:18 PM Permalink
what karnataka.what happens at national level.how left and congress are playing.do you forget it.what happens in jharkhand.(independant is chief minister)
This episode shows the deficiency of the parlimanentary system of governance. It is OK in UK where only two parties are allowed to contest elections. The problem arises when unlimited number of parties can contest, each getting a few seats.
RE:s
by balaji srinivasan on Oct 28, 2007 07:11 PM Permalink
remember vallabhai patel.india needs atleast 50 years dictorship instead of democracy to get rid of from all these politicians
