Without Godhra, no point in talking about post-Godhra.
Five years after Godhra, there is a need for an introspection---by the Muslims and the secular elite of the brutality of those responsible for Godhra and by the Hindus and the Administration of how the subsequent riots were handled. If instead of doing so, we continue the national pastime of scoring points against one another, more acts of jihadi terrorism and more incidents of communal violence are waiting to happen.
RE:Without Godhra, no point in talking about post-Godhra
by sapna srivastava on Oct 26, 2007 12:59 AM Permalink
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY ONLY ONE THING BJP SHOULD STOP TALKING OF HINDUISM. IT HAS ALWAYS BROUGHT SHAME TO HINDUS. HINDUS ARE INDEPENDENT TO SUCH PARTY. WHETHER WE VOTE TO X OR Y, THE NINDIANS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO LIVE WITHOUT SUCH PARTIES WHO CLAIM TO BE BENEFACTOR OF ONE RELIGION OR CASTE. BJP SHOULD BE CLUBBED WITH MUSLIM LEAGUE BE BANNED FOTHWITH FOR A BETTER BHARAT.
RE:Without Godhra, no point in talking about post-Godhra
by jet on Oct 26, 2007 01:09 AM Permalink
sapna ji first ban Congress and other parties which openly supported muslims, bjp is kid compared to those parties which have been doing their minority support agenda since independence
Five years after Godhra, there is a need for an introspection---by the Muslims and the secular elite of the brutality of those responsible for Godhra and by the Hindus and the Administration of how the subsequent riots were handled. If instead of doing so, we continue the national pastime of scoring points against one another, more acts of jihadi terrorism and more incidents of communal violence are waiting to happen.
RE:PLEASE READ THIS
by Abdul Naseem on Oct 26, 2007 12:50 AM Permalink
http://www.saag.org/papers22/paper2147.html
It is five years since the brutal massacre of a group of Hindu pilgrims by some members of the Muslim community in the Godhra railway station in Gujarat and the violent Hindu-Muslim riots that followed. There has so far been no objective account of the incidents of 2002 in Gujarat. An unfortunate attempt has been made by the so-called secular elite of the country to create doubts in the minds of the people about the facts relating to the carnage at Godhra. The use of force by the Administration to bring the resulting law and order situation under control has also come in for criticism from this elite. Among the criticisms made by them are that the force used was excessive and disproportionate; that it was mainly directed against the Muslim community; that there were many atrocities committed against the Muslims; that it was politically orchestrated etc.
wasnt it prudent for the channel to go the authorities and tried to bring the culprits to the court of law than doing a sicko thing like airing it for hrs and provoke a community to work against another and then create another news through it.... they should be banned..
RE:Question of National Security
by Kaushik Das on Oct 26, 2007 12:51 AM Permalink
haha - good point - it clearly shows that what they have done cannot be considered proof - maybe the tapes are also doctored - but during congress raj, it will be deemed undoctored.
Five years after Godhra, there is a need for an introspection---by the Muslims and the secular elite of the brutality of those responsible for Godhra and by the Hindus and the Administration of how the subsequent riots were handled. If instead of doing so, we continue the national pastime of scoring points against one another, more acts of jihadi terrorism and more incidents of communal violence are waiting to happen.
2. Such a campaign to play down the culpability of minority communities and to direct the attack against the administration, particularly the police, and the majority community is nothing new in our history since 1947. This has always happened after every communal riot. Whenever some Muslims take the law into their own hands, it is always the police which is criticised for acting against them. The secular elite rarely criticises the Muslims, who violated the law in the first place, and rarely calls for action against them. The voice of the secular elite will carry greater credibility if it modifies its present position that "the Muslims can do no wrong" and that it is always the Hindus and the Administration who are responsible for anything going wrong, which affects the interests of the Muslims.
RE:Hang Modi like saddam
by Arsh ali on Oct 26, 2007 01:09 AM Permalink
Go to the Bottom of the Case and if Really its some one behind the Riots then yes he has to hanged like "SADDAM"
RE:Hang Modi like saddam
by bharatkumar patel on Oct 26, 2007 12:45 AM Permalink
you mad modi has done nothing and this is a tehlka and congresss game for upcoming election in gujrat
RE:RE:Hang Modi like saddam
by Arsh ali on Oct 26, 2007 01:11 AM Permalink
if its a Congress Game how come the VHP RSS and Bajrang Leaders were on the Screens
RE:Tehalka -BJP
by thoughtfull v on Oct 26, 2007 12:47 AM Permalink
Mr Choudhary... thats what I am thinking..may be THE LADY FROM 10' JANPATH MUST HAVE OPENED HER LOCKER for LOOSERS who are against MODI GOVERNMENT.
RE:Tehalka -BJP
by Abdul Naseem on Oct 26, 2007 12:56 AM Permalink
http://www.saag.org/papers22/paper2147.html
It is five years since the brutal massacre of a group of Hindu pilgrims by some members of the Muslim community in the Godhra railway station in Gujarat and the violent Hindu-Muslim riots that followed. There has so far been no objective account of the incidents of 2002 in Gujarat. An unfortunate attempt has been made by the so-called secular elite of the country to create doubts in the minds of the people about the facts relating to the carnage at Godhra. The use of force by the Administration to bring the resulting law and order situation under control has also come in for criticism from this elite. Among the criticisms made by them are that the force used was excessive and disproportionate; that it was mainly directed against the Muslim community; that there were many atrocities committed against the Muslims; that it was politically orchestrated etc.
I cannot figure out any reason why there are no riots after Gujrat kaand ? Before that there was always riots at ahmedabad..in which hindus were often killed.
RE:Why
by Kaushik Das on Oct 26, 2007 12:52 AM Permalink
started by muslims, as usual - on the pretext that a mazaar was destroyed - however, 24 temples were destroyed before that and hindus did not riot.
RE:Genocide ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...................................
by Kaushik Das on Oct 26, 2007 12:53 AM Permalink
what's wrong with bush/jews? and dear modi is actually quite a good CM.
RE:Genocide ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...................................
by zinawar on Oct 26, 2007 12:42 AM Permalink
we want some more genocide of this kind all over india
RE:RE:Genocide ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...................................
by Kaushik Das on Oct 26, 2007 12:54 AM Permalink
we also know that you know that - not just respond but how to start riots - you know all this very well.
