See what is good for India. Don't care about Congress, Commies, BJP. Do what is good for India. WE DON'T HAVE COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY POLICY WHICH COVER ALL FACETS. Once Nuclear lobby (sales) come to India, they will have enough money to buy & over-run everybody including the top commies.
All the comrades must see the web page given below : 31 labours rescued from a brick factory in china.Eight workers were so traumatised by their experiences that they were only able to remember their names.
The labourers had to work unpaid for 20 hours at a time, and were only given bread and water in return.
The brickworks, in the poor inland province of Shanxi, is owned by the son of the local Communist Party secretary.
RE:Real communism, Socialism....
by Krishna Prasath on Oct 25, 2007 10:03 PM Permalink
sorry buddy you forget to understand chinese are capitalists not communists
anything that is opposed by communists has to be good for country. Take this thumb rule and we will definitly prosper. They don India to succeed and as someone down here wrote, they want people to be poor, middle class don support them. Only Bengal does and I wonder how can they survive there for 30 years, just common fatigue of the peope should have thrown them out. The entire state is not seeing reasons. hats off to communists to brains wash generations of bengali popualation.
We all know communists actions are guided by thier ideology. Is their party's name sugggest this? Thier forst love is their ideology not people's welfare.
Whu cannot be Congress show some guts? They should approach BJP and see if they can work out wrinkles as BJP supports strong relations with USA. I agree with author it's country diplomacy and foreign policy is at stake. We cannot allow representatives of only 5% people take hold of our government.
RE:Why blame communists only?
by PB on Oct 25, 2007 05:57 PM Permalink
Oh Come on, they don't even represent 5%. 5% in India is a big figure, all these regional parties don't go beyind 2-3% at max
No gurantee about the nuclear reactors we will be sold. Does we replace the junkyard equipment until it costs life, look at the Migs & mirages that crash & only then they get de-commissioned.
RE:Wake upto chernobyls
by Krishna Prasath on Oct 25, 2007 10:08 PM Permalink
Mirages crash? it is one of the best aircraft India had till SU-30MKI came along. I will tell you one thing, sometime back i was working on SOFC Fell Cell, when we bought one from Swiss while making agreement they included a line which states that after its lifespan we should send back the product as that we will not be able to reverse engg it this is the view of outsiders on us. And it seems i was replaying most of your posts don't take it personal, just co-incidence
All the comrades must see the web page given below : 31 labours rescued from a brick factory in china.Eight workers were so traumatised by their experiences that they were only able to remember their names.
The labourers had to work unpaid for 20 hours at a time, and were only given bread and water in return.
The brickworks, in the poor inland province of Shanxi, is owned by the son of the local Communist Party secretary.
In India, whenever we buy high price equipment for the forces, we keep it until it kills... Can we re-sell or decommission all the junkyard in forces. Now the same will be with junkyard nuclear reactors that we will buy from abroad, nobody knows how we can handle Chernobyl!!! what percentage of people we want to use a guinea-pigs. Can we re-sell all the equipment we buy, ofcource the Aircraft we buy consume pilot life, lot of the used Sea Aircraft carriers are sold to India. Do you think Americans will build new reactors for India?? Even when they are new, there can be Chernobyls now or in 100 years. Can we build nuclear plants under-sea. even that can hurt the marine life.
RE:Migs have take so many lives
by Prem Mohan on Oct 25, 2007 06:16 PM Permalink
Chernobyl was not American. It was Russian, in case you have forgotten.
U have 'high thinking' leaders and comrades to lead and save India, pls. suggest the exact plan to save India from power crisis. Dont ask me , ''where is the crisis in India ??''.
There are many villages in India , where the electricty has not reached and not to mention about the 'power cuts' ....
So come out with a realistic plan, whatever it may be..... from water, air, wind, waves, sunlight, nuclear ... anything to solve the problem......
RE:RE:Dear Communists
by Guruji on Oct 25, 2007 05:42 PM Permalink
All the comrades must see the web page given below : 31 labours rescued from a brick factory in china.Eight workers were so traumatised by their experiences that they were only able to remember their names.
The labourers had to work unpaid for 20 hours at a time, and were only given bread and water in return.
The brickworks, in the poor inland province of Shanxi, is owned by the son of the local Communist Party secretary.
Poor Manmohan has been left in the lurch by his chief Sonia ,his comrade-in-arms Lalu and Karuna and of course leftists goons.He has no constituency, no political background,a prisoner of circumstances, a clerk in Sonia office and that too a LDC.Lalu,Karuna are UDC.Had he any guts or principles he would have resigned, formed his own congress and plunged into elections but he is not Idira Gandhi of 1969.Sonia congress is too faint-hearted unwilling to leave halwa-puri gor the last one more year.the Aam Admi is concerned only withe the prive of onions and kerosine.With such jokers the DEAL was bound to fail. Jai Hind
RE:Poor Man mohan
by Suresh Menon on Oct 25, 2007 05:44 PM Permalink
In Sonia's books, Manmohan is nothing more than a care-taker PM, looking after the affairs only because Sonia can't do it directly.
It was like 'Hey we know this is a great thing for the country, it will help us be a superpower. '
After the comrades threatened to pull the rug, it was like 'You know what, we don't care what is good for the people or country. We want to stay in power. Period'
With people like these, does India need Pakistan and China?
RE:Poor Man mohan
by ravi prakash on Oct 25, 2007 05:46 PM Permalink
The Nuclear Deal is between two democracies, but the manner in which it is going thru is a study in contrasts. The national self interest of the US is paramount and clearly articulated while our national self interest is in a mess. The author of the article is being simplistic when he says that the deal is about pluck and confidence. The Nuclear deal is certainly about having confidence in our own resources and home grown skills to generate nuclear power in a safe and clean manner. But it is in this area that we have shown our total lack of confidence. We say that we have abundant reserves of Thorium but we do not seem to have the confidence to use this mineral to generate Nuclear energy. At least this is the impression that the Govt wants to convey. On the one hand, our country seeks to have wideranging defence collaboration with the US but on the other we are blocked for producing our own N-weapons. Does one assume that our relationship is limited to only conventional weapons? Why should India accept such absurd arrangements at all. The image of India is not sullied but the image of our leadership is definitely dented. Locally, it was never very encouraging but now we have international confirmation. It is not only the Nuclear Deal, just look at the Foreign affairs track record: The Wheat Deal, the prosecutio of Quatrocchi, the Border Problem with China and Pakistan, the Burma and Tibetan questions. We are like that only!
