Vijaya Dashami greetings to all. Visit this online exhibit on Kashmir to see its history and reality http://www.factusa.org/totalexhibit/exhibition.asp
1) GHIYASUDDIN GHAZI KHAN NEHRU (J.NEHRU who created pakistan. SEVERAL LAKH INNOCENT INDIAN PERISHED IN THE BLOODSHED OF 1947 partition) 2) INDRA GHAZI KHAN ( GANDHI ?) - who gifted KASHMIR to PAKISTAN creating Indian Occupied Kashmir, and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, Bangladesh.( SEVERAL THOUSAND 80,000 ARMY PERSONELL HAVE DIED SO FAR PROTECTING IOK FROM POK. 3) RAJIV GHAZI KHAN (GANDHI?) - who gulped down more than 100 crore hard earned money of Indians, and killed 15000 indian sikhs in 1984 riots.
then once this lot is over, we should burn another 3
a) SONIA GHAZI KHAN,(GANDHI?) B) PRIYANKA GHAZI KHAN (GANDHI?) C) RAHUL GHAZI KHAN(GANDHI?)
THESE 3 DIRTY RATS OF CONGRESS HAVE THEIR TAIL DRENCHED WITH BLOOD OF THOUSAND OF INDIANS.
ONLY IF WE BURN THEIR EFFIGIES/KILL THEM , WE WILL FREE OUR COUNTRY FROM EVIL SPIRITS OF PIRATED GANDHI AND EVIL CONGRESS.
DEATH TO CONGRESS ! DEATH TO PIRATED GANDHIS _______WEBMIRCHI.COM
RE: THE REAL RAVAN OF 20TH CENTURY
by Chandrika on Oct 22, 2007 10:23 AM Permalink
Well said.This is bitter truth! But we have to accept this universal truth.
RE: THE REAL RAVAN OF 20TH CENTURY
by pratima sharma on Oct 22, 2007 09:32 AM Permalink
Dear Mr., U need some knowledge on the subject history. Go through it again, before blaiming someone. Nehru family is not responsible for it. Pakistan was created boz of muslim league as well. they never supported India in Independence struggle, and at the time when they realised that India is going to be independent, they demanded power. How ridiculous it was. and u still says that nehru or Gandhi are responsible? Dear just go through the history again, and read it without being biased. Talking about 84 riots? well, who killed Indira? than how can it be controlled, rajiv never knew it will happen like this, he was never in active politics before that. and we Indians r responsible to make one family popular and in such a way as if no one else can run ths country. take responsibility, if u r India. Instead of being a dooter, try to be a problem solver. Killing soemone cannot be the solution.
RE:RE: THE REAL RAVAN OF 20TH CENTURY
by vijay kikkeri on Oct 22, 2007 03:44 PM Permalink
I see logic only in the psudo name of this person. From the time of Alauddin Khilji all the muslim rulers were ruthless to their subjects and it is a well known part of the history that how cruel they were in forcing islam on India. After this brutal attack, Hindus had lost their self confidence and esteem. Thanks to the 4 guys mentioned in the above book, Hindus could regain their confidence.
RE: THE REAL RAVAN OF 20TH CENTURY
by bullseye on Oct 23, 2007 01:13 PM Permalink
see how congress slipped from muslim hands to chirstians hands now. priyadarshni become indra bagum after she wedded to feroze khan, son of nawab khan in junagat in gujarath.indra bagum gave birth to ravij through feroz khan first.after one and half year during the absence of feroz khan who was in london then,sanjay was born to indra bagum out of mohammd yunus who was appointed by indra as chief of trade development authority ltd new delhi at the time of emergency and when indra was P M. it is mohammed yunus who wept and cried after seeing sanjay body when he was killed in aircrash accident (RAW hand is still in debate) mohammed yunus first wife son was imprisoned in u s a for 30 years due to drug smuggling.when rajiv went to USA,he requested then US president to release his half brother from prison as a special gesture which was done by US president. now muslim connections of nehru family is slipped in to chirstianity.see below-
ravji married kGP/opus dei (vatigan intelligence agency based in rome)planted anotonia maino sanio in a london church(his mother indra bagum married in a london mosque with ferozkhan) rajiv name was changed to roberto then before the marriage as per chirstianity wedding. they gave birth to two children- bianca ( priyanka ) and raul (rahul)as later names are as per italian style but was changed to hindu names to fool indians. priyanka married wadra,a chirstian whose father is an indian christian married to an italian lady.so h
RE:RE: THE REAL RAVAN OF 20TH CENTURY
by bullseye on Oct 23, 2007 01:23 PM Permalink
contd, priyanka married wadra,a chirstian whose father is an indian chirstian married to an italian lady.so priyanka mother in law is an italian and her mother is an italian.rahul who is yet to marry officaly has connections with colombian lady veronica juvenita and will marry soon after he become PM in 2008 once manmohan singh is thrown out.this colombian lady will soon be groomed in india by congresswalas as future PM japanese origin man who was appointed as PM in peru,a south american nation in election by poor peruvian indians(they are native indians of andes mountain region and similar to indian culture as they pray only sun as god)this japanese PM looted peru wealth and one day fled to japan with money.same situation will come to our indians also soon thanks to congress whose aim is to spoil india and our native culture. hell with congress and destroy this party.
Wow its really cool to see so many Kashmiri pandits in Kashmir...islam has gone "tolerant", these Kahmiri hindus are coming out in "throngs of thousands" on the street with fear of being killed !!!!!
RE:RE:RE:So many people !!!
by on Oct 22, 2007 09:09 AM Permalink
The presence of Hindus in valley is not because of their tolerance but because of presence and strictness of army and security personnels.I have been there and security people told us not to open the window of car while passing from busy bazar otherwise even a small boy will put grenade and blow off.Don\'t know why people are so intolerant .In every religion the lesson of tolerance is taught but still we don\'t understand.After coming to islamic nation in middle east I got to understand some aspects of Islam too and found most of the teachings are similar but I believe some have misunderstood the meaning or mend the meaning in their own favor to achieve their personal goals.
It's great occasion. It is a triumph of pluralism over fanaticism that militant bodies have been propagating. Kashmiri pundits have every right to celebrate their festivals in the Valley. Maqbool Siraj
