The time has come to emphasise the importance "Kannadatva" over "Secularism" and "Hindutva" because neither of the latter promise security for Kannada and Kannadigas. It is time to throw northie parties out of Karnataka and build strong regional parties that can work for the cause of Kannada and Kannadigas and represent Karnataka at the centre.
RE:Throw northie parties out of Karnataka
by siva kumar on Oct 06, 2007 07:34 PM Permalink
nanna loosu magne! Though BJP is a national party, Chief minister is going to be a kannadiga voted by kannadigas
RE:Throw northie parties out of Karnataka
by bharat on Oct 06, 2007 07:37 PM Permalink
mr.gopal krishna first you remove both gopal & krishna from your name otherwise i have doubt about your fathernity.defenitely you are a convert (for just one rice bag) who want to first disintegrate hindus & then fragment this great nation bharat for your petty interests.people like you must be hanged publicly for such anti nation activities because there is no difference in you & kashmiri terrorist even you are worse. but we children of bharat maa will never let you to destroy our nation. jai bharat
RE:Throw northie parties out of Karnataka
by Gopal Krishna on Oct 06, 2007 07:41 PM Permalink
Dharam is puppet of Italian born Sonia and Yeddi is puppet of Pakistan born Advani. Both are slaves to northie parties, what difference does it make that they are kannadigas! We want strong and independent kannadigas to rule Karnataka, not those enslaved to these stupid alien ideologies!
The time has come to emphasise the importance "Kannadatva" over "Secularism" and "Hindutva" because neither of the latter promise security for Kannada and Kannadigas. It is time to throw northie parties out of Karnataka and build strong regional parties that can work for the cause of Kannada and Kannadigas and represent Karnataka at the centre.
RE:Throw northie parties out of Karnataka
by Prem Mohan on Oct 06, 2007 07:32 PM Permalink
Sorry. Even Deve Gowda cannot live that long. Or do you mean he has a long line of descendants?
RE:Throw northie parties out of Karnataka
by Kumar Kalyan on Oct 06, 2007 07:37 PM Permalink
Afterthat Kumarswamy then yendaswamy than gendaswamy, then puttuswamy, then muthuswamy ..... then some swamy
In the name of alliance so many unconstitutional things are going on in our country.
As this suits every party at sometime or other nobody is really interested to stop this.
BJP was voted by the people and emerged as the single largest party, But by the oppurtunistic alliance of JD(S) and Cong it was not allowed to come to power. Then they called BJP as a communal party,,,, but BJP is a party recognised by the election commission and the constitution to exist and contest elections. Not only that, it is a democratic set up and the very people of Karnataka have voted for BJP to be the single largest party. But BJP was not allowed to form a Govt and two parties with less number of MLAs than BJP formed the Govt and made the single largest party to sit outside as opposition. Is it not unconstitutional and illogical?
Is it not fooling the voters and against democratic principles?
There is no proof for any party to be truely secular. Because all of them have aligned with BJP when it suited them and called it a communal party when not required.For this there in enogh proof. Even VP Singh, Mulayam , Mayavati or Karunanidhi, all had an alliance whenever they required BJP.Now it is Deve Gowda and his son.
Now the question is kumarasamy has enjoyed chief ministership with the support BJP by giving some promise and casting aspersions on BJP now is immoral, against human qualities.
So why to allow these people to divert the voters'verdict.So dont allow More post election alliance!
In the name of alliance so many unconstitutional things are going on in our country.
As this suits every party at sometime or other nobody is really interested to stop this.
BJP was voted by the people and emerged as the single largest party, But by the oppurtunistic alliance of JD(S) and Cong it was not allowed to come to power. Then they called BJP as a communal party,,,, but BJP is a party recognised by the election commission and the constitution to exist and contest elections. Not only that, it is a democratic set up and the very people of Karnataka have voted for BJP to be the single largest party. But BJP was not allowed to form a Govt and two parties with less number of MLAs than BJP formed the Govt and made the single largest party to sit outside as opposition. Is it not unconstitutional and illogical?
Is it not fooling the voters and against democratic principles?
There is no proof for any party to be truely secular. Because all of them have aligned with BJP when it suited them and called it a communal party when not required.For this there in enogh proof. Even VP Singh, Mulayam , Mayavati or Karunanidhi, all had an alliance whenever they required BJP.Now it is Deve Gowda and his son.
Now the question is kumarasamy has enjoyed chief ministership with the support BJP by giving some promise and casting aspersions on BJP now is immoral, against human qualities.
So why to allow these people to divert the voters'verdict.So dont allow More post election alliance!
In the name of alliance so many unconstitutional things are going on in our country.
As this suits every party at sometime or other nobody is really interested to stop this.
BJP was voted by the people and emerged as the single largest party, But by the oppurtunistic alliance of JD(S) and Cong it was not allowed to come to power. Then they called BJP as a communal party,,,, but BJP is a party recognised by the election commission and the constitution to exist and contest elections. Not only that, it is a democratic set up and the very people of Karnataka have voted for BJP to be the single largest party. But BJP was not allowed to form a Govt and two parties with less number of MLAs than BJP formed the Govt and made the single largest party to sit outside as opposition. Is it not unconstitutional and illogical?
Is it not fooling the voters and against democratic principles?
There is no proof for any party to be truely secular. Because all of them have aligned with BJP when it suited them and called it a communal party when not required.For this there in enogh proof. Even VP Singh, Mulayam , Mayavati or Karunanidhi, all had an alliance whenever they required BJP.Now it is Deve Gowda and his son.
Now the question is kumarasamy has enjoyed chief ministership with the support BJP by giving some promise and casting aspersions on BJP now is immoral, against human qualities.
So why to allow these people to divert the voters'verdict.So dont allow More post election alliance!
RE:BJP wants President's rule soon
by siva kumar on Oct 06, 2007 07:26 PM Permalink
Do you have any definition for communal party?If BJP is communal and against why not to derecognise it by the election commission?
Without doing that simply cryin BJP is communal Party is utter foolishness to say the least,
RE:RE:BJP wants President's rule soon
by Moo Glee on Oct 06, 2007 07:29 PM Permalink
BJP is a communal party not working for hindus. Congress, Communists are secular working only for muslims.
RE:BJP wants President's rule soon
by Prem Mohan on Oct 06, 2007 07:29 PM Permalink
Everyone cries "BJP is a communal party." Including Mdm Sonia Gandhi, the Prime Minister and Mr Deve Gowda. So I also cry.
Yes, it is the right thing BJP demands, but the centre will not accede to its demand. JDS has already started behind the doors bargaining with Congress. Both parties will always try to keep BJP out of power not only in Karnataka but entire India. We very well know the President's role in the Indian context of Parliamentary democracy and the Constitution. The Parliamentary form of democracy is a farce thrust on Indian population. Indian politics is a flourishing trade/business/commerce at the cost and expense of Indian public. But no remedy possible because, it is again in the hands of the same Parliament. Nothing can be done about it.
RE:KARNATAKA ISSUE
by Pathan on Oct 06, 2007 07:22 PM Permalink
you right even rediff mail dont have courage to display this message they just hide our message. Rediff mail administrators should know there is freedom of speach in India.
RE:KARNATAKA ISSUE
by Prem Mohan on Oct 06, 2007 07:23 PM Permalink
How about Chandrashekhar, I.K.Gujral, Charan Singh and Dr Manmohan Singh (His Mistress's Voice)?
