According to the Islamo-fascist terrorist thinking , the World is divided into 2 spheres, dar-al- Islam, meaning the land of Islam, which includes Pakistan and other middle Eastern countries and dar-al - harb, MEANING THE land of the unbeliever or so called Kafirs like United States, India, Israel and countries in Europe.
The terrorists believe that the fundamental aspect of Islamic teaching is to make Islam the dominant religion of the entire world.
They would then treat all the non-believers of Islam as Dhimmis and subject them to all kind of humiliating treatment.
The bomb blasts in India, which is taking palce is one of the grandiose designs of the Islamo-fascist terrorists to systematically subjugate Hindus and convert India into a Islamic State.
RE:What the Islamo-fascist terrorists believe in ???
by Anmol Kumar on Oct 06, 2007 12:40 PM Permalink
I think you need to see some videos of Dr Zakir Naik.And I am sure u will get all your answers from there.Go to www.youtube.com and type zakir naik.
IT very sad that we are abusing to each other, Iraq, Palastine, Pakistan, Afganistan is even though is 100% Islamic Country but still daily 1000 of Innocent Peple come under Terrorist atactk, so it means that There is no religion for Terrorist, like in Andhra There is Naxal, in Assam Ulfa , in Bihar Ranbir sena, but we no say Hindu Terrisum... why ? Isalm is only solution and Its Spreading Very Fast.... in East as well as West like UK, Eroupe, and those Heat Islam they are doing this kind of Think. I love india
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by sssssssssssss sssssssssss on Oct 06, 2007 10:22 AM Permalink
Can you tell us the difference between Islamic terrorists and naxalites?
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Virgo on Oct 06, 2007 10:28 AM Permalink
Sameer bro, first please note that there are many Paki ISI agents here who want to instigate communal issues on our forum. They assume Indian identities here and troll our forums to cause trouble.
I agree with you that there are a lot of terrorism committed that are other than Islamic. At the same time, you have to be honest that only the Islamic terrorists are committing terrorism in the name of God. I would call it Hindu terrroism if they say that their God sanctined it. Also, you cannot be defensive about Islamic terror.
I am a patriotic Indian who believes all Indians, including Muslims, Christian, Sikhs are my brothers, excluding the anti-national traitors.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by iam indian on Oct 06, 2007 10:35 AM Permalink
Its high time for muslim bros to register protest against the terrorist and also come forward to hand over the traitors-if they know one-to the police!I think there shud be fatwa against the traitors and terrorists.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Ismail Sayyed on Oct 06, 2007 10:34 AM Permalink
Islam comes from the root word Salaam,which means peace. It also means submitting one's will to Allah (swt). The word Salaam is also an attribute of God. In this context, it means The Giver of Peace.Muslims greet each other with Salams which translates to wishing peace for one another.Thus peace is a goal that Muslims are required to strive for, in their own selves, in their families and in their communities.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Anmol Kumar on Oct 06, 2007 12:47 PM Permalink
I think you need to see some videos of Dr Zakir Naik.And I am sure u will get all your answers from there.Go to www.youtube.com and type zakir naik.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Virgo on Oct 06, 2007 10:44 AM Permalink
Ismael, I am sure that is what you personally practice and that you are a peaceful patriotic Indian. I am also sure that most Muslims are peaceful people.
However, you cannot deny that there are inherent conflicting teachings of bigotry and hatred in Quranic verses and the Hadiths. I have studied the scriptures very well and am speaking from an intellectual perspective, and not hatred. The intolerant aspects of Islam do give a source of strength and justification to terrorists such a Bin Laden and the Islamic terrorists who are killing innocent people throughout the world.
These aspects have been intellectually analyzed by many muslim intellectuals such as Ali Sina, Ibn Warraq, Anwar Shaik and scored of others.
If you are talking about Sufism, I would agree that it is a lot more peaceful. Unfortunately, it is not considered Islam by the Salafists and most Sunnis. By the way, Sufism has heavily borrowed from Hinduism. Anwar Shaik discusses these in his work on mysticism.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Virgo on Oct 06, 2007 11:01 AM Permalink
You see Karachi Ganapati,
The difference between me and you is that you are either a paki ISI agent, or a plain hatemonger. Both are trying to divide Indian society. I am not afraid to call what I see as wrong and the truth, but I am for uniting people and not dividing.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Ganapati Hegde on Oct 06, 2007 10:21 AM Permalink
Naxalism can be crushed in no time. However the global jehadi terror is threat to entire non- Islamic countries.
RE:RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by sssssssssssss sssssssssss on Oct 06, 2007 10:25 AM Permalink
Naxalism came into existance to uplift the poor, they are fighting for poor (for food, clothes, land). They never targetted innoccent people mostly. But Jihadi elements mostly target innoccents.
RE:Terrerist has no relegion
by Ismail Sayyed on Oct 06, 2007 10:30 AM Permalink
People like you are Threat to the whole Humanity who spread & Preaches Hatred. What do you mean by terrorism? Is it only planting bombs? No planting hatred is also a kind of terrorism. In fact that is the root of all terrorist activities. You are worse than a terrorist. You are a Hate Monger.. Got It!!
Matter of fact is WE DONT HAVE A GENUINE OPTION. BJP IS EXTREMIST AND CONGRESS HAS STARTED REVERSE DISCRIMINATION.THERE IS NO SINGLE PARTY LEFT WHO IS UNBIASED AND THINK ONLY FOR THE NATION. TELL ME ONE LEADER OF NATIONAL STATURE WHOM EVERYBODY RESPECT IRRESPECTIVE OF RELIGION/CASTE??? EVERY SINGLE PARTY BELIEVES IN DIVIDE AND RULE!
RE:DIRTY POLITICIANS!
by sssssssssssss sssssssssss on Oct 06, 2007 10:16 AM Permalink
You are right. But now a days politicians became like that, they are dividing ppl like caste, religion, creed and etc... I have seen one istance in AP govt (Y S Rajashekhar Reddy)has taken one step ahead at the time of muslim reservation bill, they have catogorised them into subcastes like Dhobee, carpenter' etc basing on their day to day work.
RE:DIRTY POLITICIANS!
by iam indian on Oct 06, 2007 10:26 AM Permalink
Govt. should be strict to every antinational element.No need to protect anybody.This would send strong signals to antinationals whoever it is. Every INDIAN would aprreciated that.isn't it?
RE:DIRTY POLITICIANS!
by Ismail Sayyed on Oct 06, 2007 10:14 AM Permalink
I agree with you that all political parties are nonsense and selfish and that only ordinary people suffer. hats off to you for these words.
Any developing nation should first ensure internal security. Even in yesterdays news both the PM and Shivraj Patil have expressed that they are expecting terror attacks shortly. This shows that the UPA government has no clue whatsoever on how to control terrorism...
If they cant provide internal security, let them handover power to the BJP. Hyderabad has already been downgraded in the last one month and to get back the glory it achieved during TDP's time will take some more time.
Whats the use of talking biz development when you cant provide basic security to the citizens? YSR government has basically corrupted the police force to the maximum so much so that for the sake of muslim votes they will appease anybody.
There is more investment in Gujarat under Modi even though USA refused to allow him to visit it [USA allowed Ahmenijad of Iran but they did not allow Modi proving that it was the Christian Clique in India who were responsible so USA was poorer - not Modi].
WE NEED A STRONG HANDED TACTICS TO STOP TERRORISM, NOT MUSLIM VOTES.....
RE:WE NEED A STRONG HANDED TACTICS TO STOP TERRORISM, NOT MUSLIM VOTES.....
by dayakar b on Oct 06, 2007 10:30 AM Permalink
Mr Sanjay you seems to be a BJP fundamnetalist You should know that Modi is not allowed becos he is unteneble and hopeless compared to Ahmedanijad. US have every right to decide who they can entertain.
