The judiciary in India is very unfair in its judgments in many cases. Any one dares to raise about the wrong judgments passed by them, they are hauled up by brandishing their lethal weapon %u201Ccontempt of court%u201D and thus peoples%u2019 voice is gagged.
A State Bank of Hyderabad official had filed false affidavits under oath in both A.P. and Delhi High Courts for which no action has been taken against the offender and he was simply let-off. The accused has taken %u201Cstays%u201D from both the High Courts in the same case and both stays remained in force simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country (RFA.No. 19/2001). In fact, the A.P. High Court has no jurisdiction to grant stay in a case where a decree has been given by Tis Hazari Court, Delhi but the judge Hanumanthappa granted the stay.
(i) In a similar case involving a misguided Muslim girl, Ms Zahira Sheik of Best Bakery carnage of Vadodara (Gujarat), the Apex Court has imposed heavy penalty and one year imprisonment to her on a charge of perjury.
In another recent case involving a Rajasthan Minister, the Savoi Madhopur judge had fined him for filing a false affidavit and also for delaying the case deliberately.
(ii) I have approached the Supreme Court of India, New Delhi as a Petitioner-in-Person to punish the Bank employee on similar grounds but the court has dismissed the case on 25-01-07 and this clearly shows that there is no %u201Cequality before the law%u201D in this country.
The judiciary in India is very unfair in its judgments in many cases. Any one dares to raise about the wrong judgments passed by them, they are hauled up by brandishing their lethal weapon %u201Ccontempt of court%u201D and thus peoples%u2019 voice is gagged.
A State Bank of Hyderabad official had filed false affidavits under oath in both A.P. and Delhi High Courts for which no action has been taken against the offender and he was simply let-off. The accused has taken %u201Cstays%u201D from both the High Courts in the same case and both stays remained in force simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country (RFA.No. 19/2001). In fact, the A.P. High Court has no jurisdiction to grant stay in a case where a decree has been given by Tis Hazari Court, Delhi but the judge Hanumanthappa granted the stay.
(i) In a similar case involving a misguided Muslim girl, Ms Zahira Sheik of Best Bakery carnage of Vadodara (Gujarat), the Apex Court has imposed heavy penalty and one year imprisonment to her on a charge of perjury.
In another recent case involving a Rajasthan Minister, the Savoi Madhopur judge had fined him for filing a false affidavit and also for delaying the case deliberately.
(ii) I have approached the Supreme Court of India, New Delhi as a Petitioner-in-Person to punish the Bank employee on similar grounds but the court has dismissed the case on 25-01-07 and this clearly shows that there is no %u201Cequality before the law%u201D in this country.
The judiciary in India is very unfair in its judgments in many cases. Any one dares to raise about the wrong judgments passed by them, they are hauled up by brandishing their lethal weapon %u201Ccontempt of court%u201D and thus peoples%u2019 voice is gagged.
A State Bank of Hyderabad official had filed false affidavits under oath in both A.P. and Delhi High Courts for which no action has been taken against the offender and he was simply let-off. The accused has taken %u201Cstays%u201D from both the High Courts in the same case and both stays remained in force simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country (RFA.No. 19/2001). In fact, the A.P. High Court has no jurisdiction to grant stay in a case where a decree has been given by Tis Hazari Court, Delhi but the judge Hanumanthappa granted the stay.
(i) In a similar case involving a misguided Muslim girl, Ms Zahira Sheik of Best Bakery carnage of Vadodara (Gujarat), the Apex Court has imposed heavy penalty and one year imprisonment to her on a charge of perjury.
In another recent case involving a Rajasthan Minister, the Savoi Madhopur judge had fined him for filing a false affidavit and also for delaying the case deliberately.
(ii) I have approached the Supreme Court of India, New Delhi as a Petitioner-in-Person to punish the Bank employee on similar grounds but the court has dismissed the case on 25-01-07 and this clearly shows that there is no %u201Cequality before the law%u201D in this country.
The judiciary in India is very unfair in its judgments in many cases. Any one dares to raise about the wrong judgments passed by them, they are hauled up by brandishing their lethal weapon %u201Ccontempt of court%u201D and thus peoples%u2019 voice is gagged.
A State Bank of Hyderabad official had filed false affidavits under oath in both A.P. and Delhi High Courts for which no action has been taken against the offender and he was simply let-off. The accused has taken %u201Cstays%u201D from both the High Courts in the same case and both stays remained in force simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country (RFA.No. 19/2001). In fact, the A.P. High Court has no jurisdiction to grant stay in a case where a decree has been given by Tis Hazari Court, Delhi but the judge Hanumanthappa granted the stay.
(i) In a similar case involving a misguided Muslim girl, Ms Zahira Sheik of Best Bakery carnage of Vadodara (Gujarat), the Apex Court has imposed heavy penalty and one year imprisonment to her on a charge of perjury.
In another recent case involving a Rajasthan Minister, the Savoi Madhopur judge had fined him for filing a false affidavit and also for delaying the case deliberately.
(ii) I have approached the Supreme Court of India, New Delhi as a Petitioner-in-Person to punish the Bank employee on similar grounds but the court has dismissed the case on 25-01-07 and this clearly shows that there is no %u201Cequality before the law%u201D in this country.
The judiciary in India is very unfair in its judgments in many cases. Any one dares to raise about the wrong judgments passed by them, they are hauled up by brandishing their lethal weapon %u201Ccontempt of court%u201D and thus peoples%u2019 voice is gagged.
A State Bank of Hyderabad official had filed false affidavits under oath in both A.P. and Delhi High Courts for which no action has been taken against the offender and he was simply let-off. The accused has taken %u201Cstays%u201D from both the High Courts in the same case and both stays remained in force simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country (RFA.No. 19/2001). In fact, the A.P. High Court has no jurisdiction to grant stay in a case where a decree has been given by Tis Hazari Court, Delhi but the judge Hanumanthappa granted the stay.
(i) In a similar case involving a misguided Muslim girl, Ms Zahira Sheik of Best Bakery carnage of Vadodara (Gujarat), the Apex Court has imposed heavy penalty and one year imprisonment to her on a charge of perjury.
In another recent case involving a Rajasthan Minister, the Savoi Madhopur judge had fined him for filing a false affidavit and also for delaying the case deliberately.
(ii) I have approached the Supreme Court of India, New Delhi as a Petitioner-in-Person to punish the Bank employee on similar grounds but the court has dismissed the case on 25-01-07 and this clearly shows that there is no %u201Cequality before the law%u201D in this country.
The judiciary in India is very unfair in its judgments in many cases. Any one dares to raise about the wrong judgments passed by them, they are hauled up by brandishing their lethal weapon %u201Ccontempt of court%u201D and thus peoples%u2019 voice is gagged. A State Bank of Hyderabad official had filed false affidavits under oath in both A.P. and Delhi High Courts for which no action has been taken against the offender and he was simply let-off. The accused has taken %u201Cstays%u201D from both the High Courts in the same case and both stays remained in force simultaneously making a mockery of judicial system in the country (RFA.No. 19/2001). In fact, the A.P. High Court has no jurisdiction to grant stay in a case where a decree has been given by Tis Hazari Court, Delhi but the judge Hanumanthappa granted the stay. (i) In a similar case involving a misguided Muslim girl, Ms Zahira Sheik of Best Bakery carnage of Vadodara (Gujarat), the Apex Court has imposed heavy penalty and one year imprisonment to her on a charge of perjury. In another recent case involving a Rajasthan Minister, the Savoi Madhopur judge had fined him for filing a false affidavit and also for delaying the case deliberately. (ii) I have approached the Supreme Court of India, New Delhi as a Petitioner-in-Person to punish the Bank employee on similar grounds but the court has dismissed the case on 25-01-07 and this clearly shows that there is no %u201Cequality before the law%u201D in this country. (
RE:Judiciary is not impartial
by hemanth kumar on Oct 01, 2007 01:42 PM Permalink
sanjeev is right........ let there be another bundh to get a supreme court in tn....
