Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 114 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Why not in India?
by mayurapriyan sivaraman on Nov 05, 2007 11:01 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Happy if Mr. Kalam had siezed power and suspended the constitution and held power for his life in India. why didnt this happen? (sigh)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why not in India?
by Sonu Madhavan on Nov 05, 2007 11:31 AM  Permalink
sivaraman, its man proposes and god disposes, i pray that your dream come true


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Pakistan issue
by GN on Nov 05, 2007 10:05 AM  Permalink 

India have to keep a watch over what is happening across the border.
It is related to security of peace loving INDIA.

India and Indians should discuss more about how to protect ourself from any unseen possibilities of threats.

We dont have to judge what is pakistan and what they will end upinto.

Do you people worry, what the pork eats !!!
We have to worry only for the pork not spoiling our gardens.

A message to Rediff.
1 article on pakistan was more than enough. We want to more about the Adulteration of food materials happening. which should be considered more dangerous than the terrorist activities.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Choice in Pakistan
by apjunkmail on Nov 05, 2007 10:01 AM  Permalink 

Choice is between Overt or Covert military rule in Pakistan. Always has been and will be.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Pak's situation and India's Predicament, by Fellow goodie.
by on Nov 05, 2007 09:50 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Well,for a moment lets accept that US and UK are really the clandestine supporters of this emergency and martial law. So why are we cribbing about it? After all who is benefiting from this exercise? Isn't that India. If we believe what Mush is claiming, that is some dangerous elements have crept in all forms of government and they pose real threat, then this,I believe is the best option. Imagine, if extreme elements took control of Pakistan's nuclear assets, how dangerous it can be for India and US and more particularly for India, because of its geographical vicinity.
Well the other side of this story could be that Mush imposed martial law to make sure that he stops the country's highest court from asking him dirty questions and dethroning him. He knows that his life is in danger if he is not in Power. He needs to be either in power or out of the country like Benazir or Nawaz sharif,if he should be alive.
Believe me, I am not supporting Martial Law, but what Pakistan is, in the last 7 years nothing different what it is now. Only difference is the constitution is dismissed,because until now he was holding both the posts of army chief,wearing a general dress and he was a non-democratic president,which is no different from martial law.
::::~W~E~B~M~I~R~C~H~I~.~C~O~M ::::: For A2Z Hot Indian Movies :::::

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Pak's situation and India's Predicament, by Fellow goodie.
by shah zeb on Nov 05, 2007 01:36 PM  Permalink
well said

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Pak's situation and India's Predicament, by Fellow goodie.
by on Nov 05, 2007 09:49 AM  Permalink 

Well,for a moment lets accept that US and UK are really the clandestine supporters of this emergency and martial law. So why are we cribbing about it? After all who is benefiting from this exercise? Isn't that India. If we believe what Mush is claiming, that is some dangerous elements have crept in all forms of government and they pose real threat, then this,I believe is the best option. Imagine, if extreme elements took control of Pakistan's nuclear assets, how dangerous it can be for India and US and more particularly for India, because of its geographical vicinity.
Well the other side of this story could be that Mush imposed martial law to make sure that he stops the country's highest court from asking him dirty questions and dethroning him. He knows that his life is in danger if he is not in Power. He needs to be either in power or out of the country like Benazir or Nawaz sharif,if he should be alive.
Believe me, I am not supporting Martial Law, but what Pakistan is, in the last 7 years nothing different what it is now. Only difference is the constitution is dismissed,because until now he was holding both the posts of army chief,wearing a general dress and he was a non-democratic president,which is no different from martial law.
To summarize, in the last 60 years Pak never had a real democracy,forget about a stable one at that. So this is nothing new to either them or Indians. A true democracy is one,which has people's mandate and the army should support it.
::::~W~

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Why sould we give any Damm about the Pakis???
by Dipak Bose on Nov 05, 2007 09:46 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Why do you bother about the Pakis, who, whether they are educated or Jungi, wants to kill us all.
Jinnah, Surawarddy, Liaqat Ali, Iqbal, were all highly educated but they have asked the Mussalmans of India to start killing Hindus in August 1946 to get Pakistan.
That is way Pakistan was born. They have either killed or expelled almost all non-Muslims.
Why should anyone in India show any sympathy for these disgusting Pakis.
Let them all go to hell. Why should we bother?
We should mind our own business, because Mussaraf can attack India at any time now with nuclear weapons. If that would happen, USA or UK will only be glad.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why sould we give any Damm about the Pakis???
by Gautam De on Nov 05, 2007 10:20 AM  Permalink
VERY VERY TRUE.
I SUGGEST WE NOW ATTACK PAK and TAKE BACK POK.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
India should learn from Pakistan
by Gautam De on Nov 05, 2007 09:30 AM  Permalink 

How clever is Gen. Musharraf. Yes he is doing all these for his own benefit, but how he has kept everyone in control! US, UK, China, India, his own men, Army, Bhutto - ALL.
HE HAS THE GUTS TO DO WHAT HE THINKS BEST FOR PAK.
INDIAN LEADERS ALWAYS ARE AFRAID TO TAKE A DECISIVE ACTIONS TO DO ANY GOOD FOR INDIA.
HOPE OUR HOPELESS SELFISH AND CORRUPT LEADERSHIP CAN TAKE A PAGE FROM MUSH'S BOOK AND LEARN TO TAKE DECISIVE ACTION- an attack on PoK and capture it? Mr. Manmohan Singh, are you listening? What do you do nowadays we wonder!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Musharraf and Sehwag
by Pankaj Ramani on Nov 05, 2007 08:50 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

We do not have any alternative to Sehwag as per BCCI !
So do the Yankies and Brit do not have any alternative for Musharraf !

Till the replacement is not found , keep cool and watch the game..........

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Musharraf and Sehwag
by White Elephant on Nov 05, 2007 09:03 AM  Permalink
you are right.

we are stuck with sehwag and pakis with mush.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mushrraf has the support of U.S andU.K
by balkrish on Nov 05, 2007 08:27 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Both U.S and U.K are right to support MR.Mushrraf in order to curb terrorism.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Mushrraf has the support of U.S andU.K
by Chirantan on Nov 05, 2007 08:40 AM  Permalink
You declare MARSHAL LAW in Kashmir to clean out terrorists and supporters. Do you have guts to do that? or let our soldiers die, let inoscents die --- No political people die?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mushrraf has the support of U.S andU.K
by Gautam De on Nov 05, 2007 09:27 AM  Permalink
India does not have the guts. It NEVER had the guts. Our "neta"s are busy only in filling their own coffers. Absolutely no concern for India.
Otherwise, this was India's best time to attack Pak-occupied-kashmir and capture it for good.
Our leadership are all "hizras".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 114 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message