I believe there r some paki purposely instigating the indian public so as to further divide the public here. that sums up everything. advise to them to kindly change their view and change the topic and not to replay the same casette again and again. addvise to them to plz show their emotions on the cpm ruled west bengal where so many innocents r being killed since last one year. thats called genocide. thats called state sponsored terrorism. WB is ruled by cpm but backed by congress, whose PM looses his sleep for some1 being arrested in ausi, but does not bother if many r tortured to death in WBengal. where is the media, they r even afraid to visit the places in the bengal. in what way they can say they are the crusaders of showing the truth. (so-called onesided truth).
forget what the pseudo-secula media has to say for the post-godhra. but even for the godhra carnage, look at their reporting which was such a bad to instigate the normal hindus. immediately on the next day of the train carnage, i.e. 28th Feb. 2002 reporting by the eng media: (1) that there was a verbal fight between one tea vendor and karsevaks at Godhra rly. Station, that fight resulting in his anger and led to the gathered mob attacking the train. Media reported the incident as if the karsevaks were responsible for the mob's behaviour of burning the train, indirectly justifying the reaction of tea vendor and his group to the action of the verbal fight. (here action-reaction formula is justified by them but the same formula is not justified when the post-godhra outburst starts.) (2) some reported that there was some allegation of molestation of one woman at the station leading to the mob burning train and some rubbish thing. Even after passage of 6 months, when during the attack on akshardham temple, reporting by editor of one leading eng daily: "inspite of attack on akshardham temple and death of 'innocent' devotees (karsevaks were not %u2018innocent%u2019!), no riots took place. whereas, in post-godhra, %u2018at least%u2019 there was some fight between tea vendor and the karsevaks (to instigate the mob to burn the train)" thereby justifying the action-reaction theory for the mob burning the train. However, porst-godhra reaction is not justified by the same media.
RE:pseudo-secular media is the worst enemy than uneducated fanatics.
by . on Nov 12, 2007 11:41 PM Permalink
In fact, the dangerous culprits in this case are the so-called educated pseudo-secular media ppl. For the the mob attacking the train, v can atleast say they were uneducated fanatics. But the media justifying reaction of burning train for the verbal fight is unthinkable. Can anybody enlighten, under the law of the land (CrPC), a verbal fight would get one how many months%u2019 jail, or whether it gets him sentenced to death, by court. Even a person killing some1 is not hanged to death by the courts. (not to think of some1 like afzal guru who inspite of being sentenced to death by court will be ultimately favoured for his mercy petition by the President). But here media says karsevaks deserved to be burnt for the verbal fight. If such is the reporting of the blind media making fool of general public, they need to be thrashed by one and all.
RE:Sonia on recent sting operation on the 2002 Gujarat riots
by . on Nov 12, 2007 11:39 PM Permalink
gr8 work. forget what the pseudo-secula media has to say for the post-godhra. but even for the godhra carnage, look at their reporting which was such a bad to instigate the normal hindus. immediately on the next day of the train carnage, i.e. 28th Feb. 2002 reporting by the eng media: (1) that there was a verbal fight between one tea vendor and karsevaks at Godhra rly. Station, that fight resulting in his anger and led to the gathered mob attacking the train. Media reported the incident as if the karsevaks were responsible for the mob's behaviour of burning the train, indirectly justifying the reaction of tea vendor and his group to the action of the verbal fight. (here action-reaction formula is justified by them but the same formula is not justified when the post-godhra outburst starts.) (2) some reported that there was some allegation of molestation of one woman at the station leading to the mob burning train and some rubbish thing. Even after passage of 6 months, when during the attack on akshardham temple, reporting by editor of one leading eng daily: "inspite of attack on akshardham temple and death of 'innocent' devotees (karsevaks were not %u2018innocent%u2019!), no riots took place. whereas, in post-godhra, %u2018at least%u2019 there was some fight between tea vendor and the karsevaks (to instigate the mob to burn the train)" thereby justifying the action-reaction theory for the mob burning the train. However, porst-godhra reaction is not justified by the same media. In fact, t
RE:RE:Sonia on recent sting operation on the 2002 Gujarat riots
by . on Nov 12, 2007 11:39 PM Permalink
In fact, the dangerous culprits in this case are the so-called educated pseudo-secular media ppl. For the the mob attacking the train, v can atleast say they were uneducated fanatics. But the media justifying reaction of burning train for the verbal fight is unthinkable. Can anybody enlighten, under the law of the land (CrPC), a verbal fight would get one how many months%u2019 jail, or whether it gets him sentenced to death, by court. Even a person killing some1 is not hanged to death by the courts. (not to think of some1 like afzal guru who inspite of being sentenced to death by court will be ultimately favoured for his mercy petition by the President). But here media says karsevaks deserved to be burnt for the verbal fight. If such is the reporting of the blind media making fool of general public, they need to be thrashed by one and all.
RE:Sonia on recent sting operation on the 2002 Gujarat riots
by ravishankar singh on Nov 12, 2007 07:14 PM Permalink
However, it has to be said to the credit of "Aaj Tak" and "Headlines Today" that they called me for a full length studio debate from 9.15 P.M. 11.45 P.M. next day. But the details of that debate shall have to wait. For the present, however, it is imperative that certain facts are stated to prevent perpetuation of the LIES propagated in 2002.
RE:Sonia on recent sting operation on the 2002 Gujarat riots
by ravishankar singh on Nov 12, 2007 07:12 PM Permalink
Fact 6: As on 5th of March, as many as 40,000 Hindus had had to be given shelter in Relief Camps. (There was plenty of media coverage given to the plight of Muslims in relief camps but no Delhi-based media covered any Hindu relief camps.)
Fact 7: In answer to the Parliament questions, the UPA Home Minister gave the figures of casualties during Gujarat riots. There were Muslims killed 790, Hindus killed 254, wounded 2500 in all missing 223. Thus this proves the lies that what happened in Gujarat was a one-sided affair for every three Muslims who died in Gujarat, one Hindu was also killed.
RE:Sonia on recent sting operation on the 2002 Gujarat riots
by ravishankar singh on Nov 12, 2007 07:09 PM Permalink
(i) Deccan Herald reported on May 2004: Conviction of 3 confessing Muslims for 7 years for attempted murder.
(ii) Indian Express dated 19.03.2006 reported: 7 Muslims convicted for life for the murder of Mukesh Panchaal.
(iii) Indian Express dated 29.03.2006 reported: 9 Muslims convicted for attempted murder and Arms Act with sentences ranging from 10 years to 18 months.
(iv) Indian Express dated 19.05.2006 reported: 4 Muslims nailed by DNA tests and convicted for LIFE.
