RE:Nehru the first betrayer
by Ravi Beedi on May 11, 2007 02:20 PM Permalink
Nehru! you mean Bachcha ur.. chacha nehru? well v r talking about nehru, v havto be hard, after independence it is so unfortunate that nehru was our first PM, did nothing, still his followers are doing nothing, Mayawati is far better than nehru luchcha, the whole family is full of cheaters, looters, next generation please try to forget this name and the movmeent.
RE:Nehru the first betrayer
by Harish on May 11, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
which nehru are you talking about? jawaharlal or motilal? but it does not matter. the whole khandhaan is full of betrayers, robbers, looters, thieves, traitors and buffoons. what else can you expect from them?
RE:Nehru the first betrayer
by gurudatt kamat on May 11, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
WHO IS NEHRU???????? YA SOMEWHERE I READ HIS NAME IN MY HISTORY BOOK, AAAAA! HAAAAN!!!! GOT IT!!!!!! 30 YEARS BACK,WHEN IWAS IN 8TH STANDARD!!!!!!!!!!!
RE:RE:RE:Nehru the first betrayer
by PRADEEP GOYAL on May 11, 2007 01:50 PM Permalink
THIS IS ONLY GANDHI LOVE FROM NEHRU.NO CONTRIBUTION OF NEHRU FOR FREEDOM. ALL OF CONGRESS IS THE BURDEN FOR INDIA FOR FREEDOM NAME.
RE:Nehru the first betrayer
by myself on May 11, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
PRADEEP GOYAL baniya buddhi chal ja ke dukan pe baith yeh baatein tere matlab ki nahi.
HEARTIEST CONGRATULATIONS TEAM MAYAWATI. you have shown the right spirit and Attitude. the demon will pay the price, you know who I mean >>>>>>>>>> yes you're right
RE:end of the Demon
by Public on May 11, 2007 01:48 PM Permalink
Congratulation for getting new "LADY DEMON" who is going to rule on the basis of caste systm, CONGratulations once again
RE:end of the Demon
by gurudatt kamat on May 11, 2007 02:20 PM Permalink
MAYAWATI.......SHAKAL SE BANDIT QUEEN PHOOLAN DEVI KI JAISI LAGTI HAI NA....???????
RE:end of the Demon
by brahman on May 11, 2007 01:51 PM Permalink
shown the right spirit ...what type of Spirit? she is yet to show the spirit to people who have voted her to power
RE:RE:Babasaheb Ambedkar Zindabad
by Manoj Kureel on May 11, 2007 03:40 PM Permalink
tum Brahmanon ki bajane ke liye hi ham power mein aaye hai.... JAI BHEEM
RE:Babasaheb Ambedkar Zindabad
by praveen c on May 11, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
Abhe thu achuth jathi dalith deemag lekhe janma hei dalith ki soch hi rahegi teri. Fit for nothing
RE:RE:Babasaheb Ambedkar Zindabad
by Dinkar Singh on May 11, 2007 01:56 PM Permalink
Dear Praveen, They are also our brother's, you don't know the holy book "Ramayan" which every Hindu respect was written by "VALMIKI" a SC. The another epic "MAHABHARAT" was narrated by "VED VYAS" he was also SC. So we respect them and they are our part. Please don't abuse your won blood.
RE:Babasaheb Ambedkar Zindabad
by praveen c on May 11, 2007 02:26 PM Permalink
Hi Dinkar, That message is for the poor soul like Avinash Gawai who dont have sense to understand what you told.I agree what you said and there is no second thought on it.
RE:Babasaheb Ambedkar Zindabad
by Dinkar Singh on May 11, 2007 01:53 PM Permalink
Dear Avinash,
Dalits were ruler in 500 BC also. The Nand vansh were ruling whole North India & their capital was Patliputra ( Patna ) their empire was called Magadh ( from West Bengal to Afganistan ) They reuled for 150 years approx.
Do you mean BJP cares for Brahmins/upper castes by supporting reservation?
Congress/Samajwadi are serving India by increasing Haj subsidy and more funds.Although the Kashmiri Muslims dont feel comfortable in India but Muslims from rest of India are very patriot, you want to say.
There is no OBC reservation in Kashmir.
They have not given the citizenship to the SC/ST who came to Jammu region from Pakistan Occupied Kashmir but have given right to Kashmiri Muslims from PoK who have relatives in Indian Kashmir.
Those SC/ST are for God sake Hindu, so they should suffer. Kashmiri Brahmins have been cleansed from Valley.
No Hindu can ever imagine to become Chief Minister of J&K even if he is OBC/SC/ST, not even in Punjab where Hindus form 30% and 40% respectively. But Congress has made Christian Chief Ministers in Kerala and AP where Christians are 20% and 2% respectively. Muslim Chief Minister in Maharashtra with 10% Muslim population, a Sikh a Prime Minister where Sikhs form less than 2% of population.
I respect kind heartedness of majority for providing chance to the people from minority communities, but should not it be a 2-way street?
RE:Plight of India
by bluebie on May 11, 2007 01:50 PM Permalink
dont speak about kerala when you dont know how things work there. It is not kind heartedness but qualification which is taken into account. Christian or Muslim or Hindu as chief minister does not matter as long as they are not corrupt or inept. For that matter, one of the only non-corrupt politicians I have heard of is A.K.Antony who was twice Kerala CM. You cannot divide people based on caste and religion in places like Kerala, which is why communist ideolegies still persist there.
RE:Plight of India
by gurpreet johar on May 11, 2007 01:53 PM Permalink
Very well said...sikhs form 2% of population very true.so they should only get 2% share of the country thats what you are saying.india is a country of more than 100 crore people so you should only get one/100 crore share of national income of india.
Is sikhs contribution for making india independent, preserving its independece and contributing to growth of the nation only 2% ?
RE:RE:Plight of India
by brahman on May 11, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
gurpreet - don't get upset yaar... some clueless fellow shooting an irrelevant message does not make any difference to patriatic Indian of any cast/relgion. Let us now forget that India is a sovereign democratic nation and public verdict is the final say. like that Parcys are the minimal population..does not mean that they cannot become prime minister or president..
India has been a country in many aspects for other countries to larn and follow... for example, Sonia being an Italian origin, is the President of the largest poltical party of India...and public accepted her and even wanted her to become the Prime Minister... of late, in the United States Indians are getting elected to white house, which was not a phenemenon some time back..
Ultimately, we are all INDIANS or HINDUSTANIS or BHARATWASI whatever you call..
RE:Plight of India
by brahman on May 11, 2007 01:53 PM Permalink
Rahul...none of the political parties cares for any religion/community and cast...they all are caring to generate wealth for themselves by playing the card of religion, uper and lower cast..
RE:Feel sorry for Bachchans.
by gk on May 11, 2007 02:00 PM Permalink
ya u wish to like face of mayavati without Ads.Big B doing it fr frienship and big b's face have a value he earn mony fr that bt mayawati ko koi bhee paisa nahee dega.
RE:Feel sorry for Bachchans.
by Harish on May 11, 2007 01:47 PM Permalink
i too feel sorry for amitabh and his family. poor fellows, they have only made 1000 crores so far. how can they live? how can you refuse them chance to loot some more along with amar sing and mulayam? pity amitabh, poor poor fellow
RE:RE:Feel sorry for Bachchans.
by gk on May 11, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
Big B ke paas itne paise hote to use budape main kaam nahee aram krna chahiye tha
RE:RE:Feel sorry for Bachchans.
by gk on May 11, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
maya ka naam hee maya dikhata hai tajmahal ghotale ka paisa kahan gya is hamam me sb nange hain
RE:Feel sorry for Bachchans.
by Sachin on May 11, 2007 01:51 PM Permalink
Thank God We dont have to see see Amitabh Bachchan again on TV screen praising Mulayam Singh Govt. but Ambitabh Bachchan knows how to change colours, he may start praising Mayawati
It is good for the country's Unity and Democracy that a part with the name Bahujan Samaj Party comes to power on its own when it genuinely included all sections in its agenda and party.
This victory of an underdog, will motivate others who are underdogs now to put in their sustained efforts to reach the upper levels.
