hey rajiv sreinivasan... the quality of your articles seem to be worsening. The observations you have made are totally useless. You either write about how great kerala is, or how horrible the rest of the world is. All this should have, would have business is useless... we dont need you to point out the obvious. Maybe you should quit writing like Varsha Bhosle, instead of pandering to rediff's demands of insipid articles.
police and intellegence agencies gather so much information and feed to concerned ministry. due to political reason government do no not take any action and they ignore their duty. in fact they are to be called antinationals or traitors. and it goes against oath they had taken at the time of assuming office. consequence ofinaction of top people burden the public with miseries and leave the country with chaos and ambiguity.
Sceanrio: Shorabudin is Sharad Kumar, Location is Kerala. Would like to read what RS would have written. RS's defence of criminals is quite evident in his previous columns, when he defended a priest who was arrested for child molestation in US - civilization & law is designed based on which community you represent. This is an absurd world !!
RE:SPIN JOB
by Julia Kingsley on May 25, 2007 11:08 PM Permalink
Hanif Mohammed, You would be a lot more convincing if it weren't for the fact that it is your religion that does have "civilization & law designed based on which community you represent". Isn't it your religion that spells out that the blood money laws that say that a Muslim is worth twice as much as a Christian, and eight times as much as a Hindu? Isn't this enshrined in the laws of your holy land, Saudi Arabia? Then it is pure hypocrisy for you to complain about Rajeev.
RE:SPIN JOB
by sm on May 27, 2007 07:53 AM Permalink
Saudi Arabia.....well!! well!! Who can dare touch the holiest of holies?? But mosques can be built in Jerusalem, Kashi, Ayodhya, Mathura, Rome and Bodh Gaya of course. These are universal properties!!
Well said, Julia. End of the matter with these Muslims arguing for 'their' 'human' rights; well , they can have them if 'KAFIRS'can have 'HUMAN'rights (i.e. equal to Muslim rights) in Muslim lands......ahem!! errr, maybe we kafirs are asking for too much; eh, Hanif??
I agree with Rajiv and ask all who object to this mode of justice to look around and see that its sometime better to finish the terrorist before we have a load of them planning to blow up India. These guys should have no rights even as they beleive in none. And let it not be seen as a system against the minority issue. Stand up and be counted as an Indian first.
I see the arugemtn and i have seen this arguemnt used by many to exsuce this killing
What people dont talk about is WHY WAS KAUSAR BI KILLED? she wastna threat, she wasnt a terrorist, she wasnt even known...
ultimately its becoz she witnessed an unlawfull act and so had to be killed to destroy the evidence, the gujurat polic knew what they were doing and after all... she was only muslim, not a real human being
RE:fine
by V H on May 25, 2007 11:32 AM Permalink
Third guy was a Hindu and hence his life doesn't count, just like it never mattered in 1000 years of brutality by outsiders
RE:fine
by Manjula A on May 28, 2007 12:52 PM Permalink
Not 1000, Indians have been treated brutally for 3,500 years by outsiders. Yes, ARYANS ARE ALSO OUTSIDERS.
RE:fine
by ravikiran on Jun 13, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
Get your history Right. Aryans as outsiders was first stated by MacMuller. Before that there was no statement made. There are many historical proofs against this. Come out of your school history text book. Read Konard Elst's debate on the myth of Aryan Invasion
RE:RE:fine
by Manjula A on Jul 06, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
You get your history right first. There is enough proof for the aryan invasion. Just because the aryans run this country now, you can go ahead and falsify any truth and destroy any evidence available. But the truth remains - ARYANS ARE OUTSIDERS AND THE MOST BRUTAL KILLERS OF INDIANS EVER.
I see the arugemtn and i have seen this arguemnt used by many to exsuce this killing
What people dont talk about is WHY WAS KAUSAR BI KILLED? she wastna threat, she wasnt a terrorist, she wasnt even known...
ultimately its becoz she witnessed an unlawfull act and so had to be killed to destroy the evidence, the gujurat polic knew what they were doing and after all... she was only muslim, not a real human being
Being a master of the game of words, Rajeev has almost gotten away with justifying of encounter killings. But what does he have, to say about what was done to Sohrabuddin's wife?
RE:Sohrabuddin was a gangster- admitted but his wife????
by Lucky B on May 24, 2007 06:14 PM Permalink
Why you didn't ask about Tulsiram? Why you didn't ask for hundreds of encounters all over India by the Police?
A biased mindset cannot be pacified, and justified.
RE:Sohrabuddin was a gangster- admitted but his wife????
by Manjula A on Jul 06, 2007 01:53 PM Permalink
Tulsiram was not a woman. Kausar bi was. and so am I
RE:Shoot em like animals
by Chola King on May 24, 2007 08:23 PM Permalink
The terrorists & anti-nationals use the legal & political system to circumvent any punishment. They will even buy the justice system with foreign finances. Even after a decade, the Bombay blast accused are living happily. Even after the Supreme court verdict the parliament attack terrorist Guru is still has not faced the gallows. Under these scenario, encounter killings should be welcomed to the save the society at large.
