RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by Yaqoot Mir on May 22, 2007 09:56 AM Permalink
Even funnier is the fact that your country to this day is yet to prove one incident of terrorism linked to Pakistan? you should be laughing at your silly country's foriegn office blurting stuff with proof all the time.
RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by Rashmi on May 22, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
The world knows which country was behind 9/11 attack, world knows from where Taliban got support, world knows which country destroyed Afghanistan thru terrorism, world knows where the Indian Airlines plane hijacker are staying, world knows......
RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by cool guy on May 22, 2007 10:22 AM Permalink
Proof is defined as "evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true" - In case of Pakistan, there is no need for proof coz you guys do it openly. Why do we need proof to say that Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism? Dont you know that Mr. Yaqoot Mir
RE:RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by Kaushik Das on May 22, 2007 11:13 AM Permalink
Yaqoot, there are hordes of evidence - only that your terorist nation does not accept it. in fact, your terrorist naiton has to send its killers with different identities - such is your disbelief in your own cause. And your terrorist nation does nto even acknowledge its terrorists - it mens, somewhere down the line, you are not true to yourself.
RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by Harish Gurumoorthy on May 22, 2007 11:29 AM Permalink
Yaar Yaqoot, Your denial itself is proof that your country is involved.
If denial were a sport, Pakis would be world champs.
You guys have the habit of denying just about everything you do. When your troops occupied the Kargil heights, you said it was the "freedom fighters", later on your PM ran to Washington to beg reprieve for your troops. Your army left behind dead bodies to rot in the icy heights.
RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by Indian on May 22, 2007 09:43 AM Permalink
Oops, swami baba what are you doing?
RE:hehe..So, the #1 state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is commenting on what is terrorism?
by Kaushik Das on May 22, 2007 11:12 AM Permalink
indian, two things: Do you really believe that an 85 year old swami can commit rape???
"It is a pattern that whenever a terrorist act occurs in India, unsubstantiated, irresponsible allegations start flying around, and in the history of Pakistan-India relations, not even one incident has been proved to be backed by any Pakistani elements," Aslam added.
Mr. Aslams words are not quite baseless, because Indian intellegents are not keeping that much vigilance towards miscreants entering into India. Visiters name too they are coming to this Nation and disappear in the crowd.
RE:Blast
by Anniyan on May 22, 2007 09:37 AM Permalink
becoz the center govt may have thought that they are going to keep in temples...so the center govt and state have not put much alerts...if they had known that they are targeting Mosque, surely the Govt will have foiled...
Hyderabad blast is a misdeed of hindu terrorism engineered by RSS VHP Bajrangdal. It is unbelievable that muslims will target mosque particularly those reciting prayers. Three blasts in row one in malegaon, second in Delhi masjid and third in hyderabad do indicate to terrorise muslims in India. Congress Govt should debunk the real faces behind the blast and it is high-time that those RSS members who have been planted in high offices in the Govt should also be screened and it would be the real litmus test for real democracy or it will convey signals that the strings of entire set up in India is pulled from behind the curtain by RSS top bosses.
Do not please repeat Zakir Naik. He is the greatest fool in the world. He does not know his own religion or Hinduism. A fake scholar. Time will come and all the fake religion will be destroyed. Just wait and watch how sanatan dharma revives. Look at the history how it came out from middle-aged doctrine. It is ever-exisitng. Not like some new rligions that pop up and shout and vanished.
RE:Please increase my understanding of Khattna
by facelessindian on May 22, 2007 05:24 AM Permalink
khatna is a sort of procedure performed to remove the foreskin of the clitoris. this has got two purpose- 1 it helps scarring to the area, more no pleasure to woman. only pain. 2 it also stisfy male ego that his wife will not enjoy sex with anyone. so muslim females will be without sex and he can enjoy sex with maid and other females.
RE:Please increase my understanding of Khattna
by Nadeem Khan on May 22, 2007 06:48 AM Permalink
HAHA.. facelessindian.. you are such an ignorant moron! Khatna.. or 'circumcision' does not remove foreskin from the clitoris. Do you even know what clitoris is?. Khatna removes the foreskin from the tip of the male penis. Majority of the world population (muslims and jews and even most christians) do it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision
It reduces risk of germs and penile cancer and some cases even HIV.
Get your facts right. And indian guy, what's the point to your question?
RE:Please increase my understanding of Khattna
by bajrangi on May 22, 2007 09:37 AM Permalink
Nadeem has correctly explaines the term.
The need for such procedure emerged because in his days, the prophet was engaged in making relations with all the creatures of allah, the goat, the hen, the males, the females etc. In summary whereever he found hole, he tried to put his tool in that, and this damaged his foreskin badly and risk of HIV, germs etc. increased. Then he derived this unique formula jisse ki "Saanp (germs) bhi mar jaye, aur lathi (his tool) bhi na toote"
RE:Please increase my understanding of Khattna
by deep dar on May 22, 2007 09:07 AM Permalink
For example, 1. Muhammad believed that the Sun sets in the sea. Not only science, Quran has even got history wrong. 1. It claims that Alexander was a Muslim, when in fact, in Greece, there is a painting of Alexander prostrating before the Sun God.
Some more fallacies of Quran include: 1. Old Jewish tales, which have even been denounced by the Jews themselves as heretical, and false. 2. Many words which don't even belong to Arabic, so, people who studied the ancient Quran were free to interpret it any way they liked. 3. A lot of unintelligent transitions, for example, one surah talks about Namaz, whereas the next one talks about fighting in Allah's cause. 4. Referring to Allah in both the 1st person and 3rd person in the same sentence.
It is a sacred belief of Muslims that the Quran is the word of Allah, and hence, it is second to none in the world of literature. But, the above points show that not only Quran is a stupid book, ANY COHERENT WRITING IS SUPERIOR TO QURAN. I wonder which kind of God can be so stupid (and his followers too!).
RE:RE:Please increase my understanding of Khattna
by Indian Guy on May 22, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
Hi Nadeem,
the reason for the question was that I think all religions are supposed to be pure and then how come we think of religious ceromonies like the one that you guys have. I might be wrong but just want to know more about Islam so please dont take my question otherwise.
