It is just a handfull of muslims who are fetching bad name to muslims...the muslim community shoud not be blamed...those disturbing elements should be isolated from the socity and punished severly...
RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Manoj Tuli on May 18, 2007 10:06 PM Permalink
Same is the case with RSS, if any. Then why are our brothers pulling them here and saying every hindu is a kafir. And why is this new term "RSS terrorists" coined for? Can one single person in this country show us some RSS terrorists who plant bombs? So dont spread gandhi gyan here, be realistic.
RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Fauwad Hurzuk on May 18, 2007 10:11 PM Permalink
I am sure you dont know who killed Gandhi Ji... That shows your general knowledge
RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Yogesh Kulkarni on May 18, 2007 10:19 PM Permalink
RSS did not kill M K Gandhi.Even if you take Nathuram as RSS activist-which he was not,you can not blame whole RSS for that.Can all muslims be blamed for deviding Indian soil for one culprit named Jinnah?
RE:RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Yogesh Kulkarni on May 18, 2007 10:22 PM Permalink
In fact RSS is involved in many humanitarian projects in remote areas that I am sure you have not heard of because they don't do publicity.They just work dedicatedly.Congress has made Indians blind.
RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Yogesh Kulkarni on May 18, 2007 10:44 PM Permalink
Yes sure...get your history straight..read history books..find out why did Neheru and Vallabhbhai patel lifted ban themselves.Read who helped earthquake victims and adopted villeges.Go to remote hilly areas in various states of India.Contact RSS and I am sure they will give you details.This is not right forum/time to discuss/advertise RSS.
RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Sid on May 18, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
It was an assassin not a terrorist. There's a difference, if you know your English well. Terming RSS as a terrorist organization is a joke. Hindu terrorists is largely a misnomer, a political term created to justify the acts of few radicals.
RE:the muslim community shoud not be blamed..
by Manoj Tuli on May 18, 2007 10:45 PM Permalink
oh yes Gandhi "JI", "JI" because he gave up the piece of land to be called Pakistan. He was OK when hindus were getting killed and went on hunger strike when the hindus retaliated. "General knowlegde"! funny!
RE:Islam is nothing but TERRORISM - A proof from Koran
by Imaan on May 18, 2007 10:47 PM Permalink
The Surah 59 derives its name from the mention of the word al-hashr in verse thereby implying that it is the Surah in which the word al-hashr has occurred.
Period of Revelation
Bukhari and Muslim contain a tradition from Hadrat Sa'id bin Jubair to the effect "When I asked Hadrat Abdullah bin Abbas about Surah Al-Hashr, he replied that it was sent down concerning the battle against the Bani an-Nadir just as Surah Al-Anfal was sent down concerning the Battle of Badr. In another tradition from Hadrat Sa'id bin Jubair, the words cited from Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) are: Qul: Surah an-Nadir: Say, it is Surah an-Nadir." The same thing has been related also from Mujahid, Qatadah, Zuhri, Ibn Zaid, Yazid bin Ruman, Muhammad bin Ishaq and others. They are unanimous that the followers of the Book whose banishment has been mentioned in it, imply the Bani an-Nadir. Yazid bin Ruman, Mujahid and Muhammad bin Ishaq have stated that this whole Surah, from beginning to end, came down concerning this very battle.
As for the question as to when this battle took place, Imam Zuhri has stated on the authority of Urwah bin Zubair that it took place six months after the Battle of Badr. However, Ibn Sa'd, Ibn Hisham and Baladhuri regard it as an event of Rabi' al-Awwal, A. H. 4, and the same is correct. For all traditions agree that this battle took place after the incident of Bi'r Ma'unah, and historically also it is well known that the incident of Bir Ma'unah occurred after the Battle of Uhud and not before it.
Historical Background
In order to understand the subject matter of this Surah well, it is necessary to have a look at the history of the Madinah and Hejaz Jews, for without it one cannot know precisely the real causes of the Holy Prophet's dealing with their different tribes the way he did.
No authentic history of the Arabian Jews exists in the world. They have not left any writing of their own in the form of a book or a tablet which might throw light on their past, nor have the Jewish historians and writers of the non-Arab world made any mention of them, the reason being that after their settlement in the Arabian peninsula they had detached themselves from the main body of the nation, and the Jews of the world did not count them as among themselves. For they had given up Hebrew culture and language, even the names, and adopted Arabism instead. In the tablets that have been unearthed in the archaeological research in the Hejaz no trace of the Jews is found before the first century of the Christian era, except for a few Jewish names. Therefore, the history of the Arabian Jews is based mostly on the verbal traditions prevalent among the Arabs most of which bad been spread by the Jews themselves.
The Jews of the Hejaz claimed that they had come to settle in Arabia during the last stage of the life of the Prophet Moses (peace be
RE:The root cause of terrorism - An analysis from koran & Mohammed life.
by farhat nasir ali on May 18, 2007 10:11 PM Permalink
Whoever has written this article is an illiterate uncivilised incompetent and stupid fool who knows not what he says and doesnt know the ABC of this peaceful religion. No where in the Quran has any killing been justified unless it is war no man has the right to another man;s life what the hell is the writer talking about.