Mani Shankar should learn to respect all freedom fighters . Gandhiji contribution is great but others have also given their life,blood & sweat for their country like lokmanya tilak,lala lajpat ray,bipin chandra,khudi ram bose,raj guru, bhagat singh,chandrashekhar azad & savarkar ......no body in congress mention their contibution except gandhi,nehru,indira,sonia
This mani shankar has once insulted the veer Savarkar. His contribution is zero because he is praised by BJP, even rahul & prinka r more patriotic than this bold freedom fighter ?
RE:red fort
by Vinay Gupta on May 07, 2007 12:06 PM Permalink
Bhai Indian, In first general election Congress under Nehru could secure 50% of votes with difficulty.
So this was the support to congress in 1947.
Had they been so poerful they could have avoided the partion of India. It is the hype and rumers spread by Congressi that they had popular support in 1947
These congressis want all of Indians to remain Non Voilent bcoz they they ahve done so many wrongs and If people loose patience and become violent then none of them will see the light next day.
So it is imerative that congressi keep giving us the opium of non voilence
RE:Congressi are afraid of Voilence but why?
by Neutral on May 07, 2007 12:03 PM Permalink
Actual first war of indian independence started in Vellore, a small district in Tamilnadu.There are several proof for that.Many persons have done a Ph.D on these proofs. Despite all such things in Red fort it has been portraited that it happened only in Mathura, agra & Jhansi. They (North indians)are trying to change the real history as usual and despite having so many people from south in the Cabinet none bothered to look at this
RE:RE:Congressi are afraid of Voilence but why?
by Samir Moosa on May 07, 2007 12:31 PM Permalink
And that is the reason why even the British called it the "North Indian Sepoy Mutiny". What do you want to prove with your Ph.D. ??? Mangal Pandey was a faux pas. Dont deny the hero his due.
RE:Congressi are afraid of Voilence but why?
by Mukesh Sharma on May 07, 2007 12:02 PM Permalink
As politician like Arjun singh, CPM have taken advantage of freedom . They r doing & speeking carelessly without seeing any future threat india is facing , just to appose BJP they supporting bangladesh,pakistan , terrorist, iraq,iran . This appeasement is dangerous for india also arjun singh is dividing the hindu community on caste what VP singh has already done. we have to save county from communist & arjun singh type leaders.....then freedom will be yours
There were so many small provinces in India. it was a hell of a job done by the britishers in uniting all the small small territories into one large one.. Only when they learnt their mistake, it was time to go. So they divided India and left back.
Anyways, thanks Goras for getting us all together.
RE:Thank the British for uniting India
by Samir Moosa on May 07, 2007 12:27 PM Permalink
Does that mean that Mughals didnt rule the whole of India as we know it today ??? My dear India was as we know it now, never existed. There were always squarelling petty kingdoms. And India is the name given to all kingdoms on the east of the Indus River. Its the Mughals (We all agree to their brutality), who actually united India. The Marathas took over from the Mughals and the British merely took over from the Marathas. Read your history first.
RE:Thank the British for uniting India
by bajrangi on May 07, 2007 03:17 PM Permalink
And refer back the history books and read through the golden era of india, Got through the Gupta and Maurya dynasty. they ruled from Modern days Afganistan to Myanmaar and in south till lanka.
RE:Thank the British for uniting India
by Vinay Gupta on May 07, 2007 11:59 AM Permalink
tell me which part of the world was having big states in 1800.