Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 367 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13   Older >
Pratibha Patil...President ?
by Its Me on Jun 27, 2007 10:57 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Doesn't Pratibha Patil seem more suited to be a housewife than a President ?

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Pratibha Patil...President ?
by Ravikumar on Jun 27, 2007 11:05 PM  Permalink
That post is already occupied by our C.M YSR.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Where morals matter,
by Ravikumar on Jun 27, 2007 10:56 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

As per US constitution the President is a role model for the people of the country.So it expects its President to be with high morals.As per rules even a divorcee is disallowed.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Where morals matter,
by surya kumar on Jun 27, 2007 11:46 PM  Permalink
just dont involve US in everything....indian democracy is very different from US's.by the way can you count a single high moral in president BUSH........

   Forward   |   Report abuse
what a pity!!
by max jones on Jun 27, 2007 10:45 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Till now i had high regards for Mr PM, after seeing today's statement, he also seems to be the bird of same flock.
He says others have the same charges too that means he believes that Mrs pratibha is also a defaulter.
If a common man applies for a Govt. job in india that firm makes sure that he/she doesnt have any criminal record or debt hanging over his/her head. then why not have a clean slate for President post.
Onething is sure how much the common man may crib at last it is going to be corrupt politicians electing a corrupt president.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:what a pity!!
by silver_111 on Jun 27, 2007 10:52 PM  Permalink

The weakest PM ever, defending the weakest ever (candidate for ) President !

Mera Bharat Mahan !


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what a pity!!
by alok Misra on Jun 27, 2007 10:57 PM  Permalink
Mr Manmohan singh never faught an election thru ballot of common people but went thru indirect route to become a prime minister. Where does he stands even before people like VP Singh?
If we say that Dr Kalam is not a political person which he his not, Manmohan singh is probably the only prime minister in a parliamentry democracy who never faught a dirwect election till date!
You do not expect much democracy from such background!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what a pity!!
by rajesh anand on Jun 27, 2007 11:29 PM  Permalink
Mate, he contested from Delhi and failed once. I think you want to say this is the first PM who is hanging on his chair thru RAJYASABHA.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what a pity!!
by surya kumar on Jun 27, 2007 11:43 PM  Permalink
and also what feathers do you find in people like ATAL BIHARI and CHANDRASHEKHAR...who were elected to lok sabha...they are bigger shame then MM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what a pity!!
by subhash mantri on Jun 27, 2007 11:54 PM  Permalink
HE IS JUST A PUPPET ONLY-KEEPING HIS pagri AT DON,S FEET ALLWAYS....SHAME FOR MERA BHART MAHAN

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Statement,
by Ravikumar on Jun 27, 2007 10:44 PM  Permalink 

While stiil people didn't forget her comments on Purdah, yesterday she said one more interseting thing thats talking with the ghost of a dead man.Whose ghost it might have been?????????????

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ad Hoc President of India- Sonia Gandhi
by Nerraine Lima on Jun 27, 2007 10:38 PM  Permalink 

Sonia Gandhi wants to be the ad hoc president of India too now after the PM's chair.All Congress Puppets ruled from Madams house can patil take the presidents chair and will the world leaders accept her. can be be a global ambassador for India at a time when India is advancing to new heights

    Forward  |  Report abuse
It is mudslinging
by Critic Creative on Jun 27, 2007 10:29 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Dear Netizens,

Let your criticism be Creative, All that is happening here is destructive. Truly said that the Prime Minister have not won an election, but that doesn't mean he falls shot of something. His path is different, we say all that time that politicians are this & that but when a Person with a non political career becomes a Prime Minister the same crown yells that he has not contested even an election. How far is this Justified?
Be responsible Citizens, we all tried to reinstall His Excellency Mr. Kalam for the second term but that was not the mood of the public(Which transforms into politicians).We the netizens will be a mare 5% of the entire nation.
We did our Job. The Job well done. We desired a second term for the president but things are not on our side. The majority thought the otherwise. Lets accept it and be happy that we had an Intellectual as our President for 5 years which no other Country had. Let some one else get the chance too. Ours is a diverse country and there are many other fields that needs representation. Lets think that this time its turn of a Social Worker. No one is perfect. We have to give a chance to prove themselves.
Lets leave politics and get involved in a constructive manner.
We have a chance too. We have out general elections due in an year. Lets prepare for that and let our own inner conscience take stock of whom to vote. Not the Parties, Religion, Caste, Regionalism or Personal gains.
Hope for the best prepare for the worst...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:It is mudslinging
by silver_111 on Jun 27, 2007 10:37 PM  Permalink

Stating Prooven facts is not'mudslinging', Mr. PM !

And how about youmaking a false affidevit that you live in Assam, to get elected into the Upper House !



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:It is mudslinging
by Santosh Sinha on Jun 27, 2007 10:34 PM  Permalink
congress never wants a president who is bigger then caste and religion .congress wants apuppet president like gyanijailsingh.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:It is mudslinging
by ashok pai on Jun 27, 2007 10:47 PM  Permalink
criticism can be creative. all if said is fine and dandy.

we never tried to reinstall kalam. we merely opined.

we never had the power to vote for kalam, only the politicians have. our mood will not be heard - since the politicians are choosing someone that fits them, they have been self serving this time (i wont talk abt the other times)

the PM surely cant have too much credit, or have a lofty conscience, and follow duplicity about his cause and kalam's cause.

we had an intellectual for 5 years, we could have easily extended it. prathibha is a lady for lady's sake. if the congress was really interested in having a lady for women's liberations' sake - they would have found a best-fit candidate, not prathibha. they dint even go for a consensus, because madam wants a puppet. kalam was a consensus candidate, not prathibha. kalam was so good , even the opposition couldnt disagree. now, we have prathibha whom even thier pown partymen like natwar singh disagree

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:It is mudslinging
by Pradeep Punjabi on Jun 27, 2007 10:51 PM  Permalink
I never knew that mud-slinging can be creative too. ... LOL.
Anyways, dear CC, why should we leave politics. Politics is not a dirty term. It is our leaders who have made it so. Country can not be run by individuals , nor social workers can run it. Social workers are part of our system. For making policies machinery is required and that is provided by political parties. You can not ignore them.
And now, you name one party who works in interest of common man. Every one who comes to power has only objective of setting the records with rivals and filling their own coffers. Otherwise how come these politicians have crores with them which you and me can not have in this life time.
I am not a pessimist but I am at a lost, where are we being led to this way.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:It is mudslinging
by Krishna on Jun 27, 2007 10:43 PM  Permalink
get your facts clear before you bark something out.. you should learn to me all these looks like constructive criticism... do not impose your ideas on others... just express your opinion.. Every one is as responsible as you are thats why they voice their opinion... its so foolish of you to think that the citizens are not responsible... when you say public.. its just politicians (may be you are from one of those politician's family).. public is out here ..voicing their concern... hear them loud! if you can

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Non-sense
by Ravikumar on Jun 27, 2007 10:25 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Our P.M Dr.Manmhohan Singh is not all what we think.when he was finance secretary he worked for the interests of Ranbaxy,he refused to renew the licence of a Swiss company on behest of Ranbaxy.Its shameful that he is defending a Candiate whose brothers and husband are involved in criminal cases.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Non-sense
by Critic Creative on Jun 27, 2007 10:35 PM  Permalink
The Champion Mud Slinger !!! Keep it up...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Non-sense
by Ravikumar on Jun 27, 2007 10:33 PM  Permalink
The Champion Sonia defender.try ur luck.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Non-sense
by silver_111 on Jun 27, 2007 10:35 PM  Permalink

We have Puppet PM Manmohan, We have criminal tainted central ministers like Lalu, but now, thanks to the 'great sacrificer' Sonia Gandhi, we are going to have a Puppet And Tainted President !

Mera Bharat Mahan !



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Non-sense
by Guruprasad Mandal on Jun 27, 2007 10:46 PM  Permalink
@ silver_111
congrats for your comments

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dr Singh
by Anto Judes on Jun 27, 2007 10:21 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Dr. Singh is an acclaimed economist with the utmost honesty and integrity. Let us not abuse him. He certainly deserves more.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Dr Singh
by silver_111 on Jun 27, 2007 10:32 PM  Permalink



Manmohan is nothing but Sonia Gandhi's head clerk. The 91 reforms were because of P V N Rao. True credit should go to him.




   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Dr Singh
by Tinku Baidya on Jun 27, 2007 11:13 PM  Permalink
U know wat he deserve??

shit!! Is this his education which help the country to lead in the misdirection??
A PM who can't claim his own power!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Dr Singh
by Critic Creative on Jun 27, 2007 10:25 PM  Permalink
Buddy, I agree with you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Dr Singh
by Hirendra Chatterjee on Jun 27, 2007 11:14 PM  Permalink
Ever since he became PM, he has been defending criminals like Lalu Yadav, Taslimuddin and Shibu Soren. Now he is defending a lady who believes in communion with ghosts - this is tantra at the lowest level or black magic. Of course, the strongest point of the PM is that he is bending forward to do Mrs. Gandhi's shoe laces and bending backward again to undo them. Three cheers for the PM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Where is '' Future of India''
by Vinay Gupta on Jun 27, 2007 10:14 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is strange that "Future of India " as described by this PM, is absconding. There is no statement from Rahul Gandhi. Can anybody tell where is he?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Where is '' Future of India''
by Vaibhav Pradhan on Jun 27, 2007 10:16 PM  Permalink
He must be busy with election campaign in Columbia...:-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Where is '' Future of India''
by silver_111 on Jun 27, 2007 10:28 PM  Permalink


Mayawati must be laughing, she alone can eat 10 Rahul Gandhis before breakfast !





   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Where is '' Future of India''
by prabhat mohanty on Jun 27, 2007 10:46 PM  Permalink
including likes of tigodias

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Where is '' Future of India''
by Tinku Baidya on Jun 27, 2007 11:18 PM  Permalink
What you expect from Sonia's son?? Rahul does'nt even know wat to coment where!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message(s) deleted by moderator not displayed on this page
Total 367 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13   Older >
Write a message