Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 142 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7   Older >
First childs are smarter
by chelliah prasad on Jun 22, 2007 03:05 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This study is correct only . first born childs are smarter than other children because they get the oppurtunity to become great person that they can do whatever they like to do. they are getting the freedom to do anything whatever way they are interested.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:First childs are smarter
by Politician on Jun 22, 2007 03:24 PM  Permalink
First Born are not getting freedom . On the other hand, 2nd and 3rd child are born due to defective condom

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First childs are smarter
by Sampath S on Jun 22, 2007 03:14 PM  Permalink
I think think Petter Kristensen and Tor Bjerkedal have used chelliah logic to draw the conclusions.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First childs are smarter
by rohit gupta on Jun 22, 2007 03:08 PM  Permalink
Mr. Prasad,

IQ or being smart is not related with the freedom one has. In this context we are discussing in-built IQ or smartness, not the smartness gained from experience or freedom.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First childs are smarter
by ac ph on Jun 22, 2007 03:10 PM  Permalink
well said Mr RG

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Senior IQ high than Junior's
by Dhananjay Purwant on Jun 22, 2007 03:04 PM  Permalink 

Norwegian Scientist need to know that FACTS ARE STRANGER THAN FICTIONS / STUDY / EXPERIMENTS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
First born is God's first gift
by Sridhar on Jun 22, 2007 03:04 PM  Permalink 

Yes.Obsolutely correct.I compared so many acheivers, scientists also with me.First born are smarter.Example of some people also proved the same.

K.Sridhar.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
First born is God's first gift
by Sridhar on Jun 22, 2007 03:03 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Yes.Obsolutely correct.I compared so many acheivers, scientists also with me.First born are smarter.Example of some people also proved the same.

K.Sridhar.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:First born is God's first gift
by Susheel Bhat on Jun 22, 2007 03:14 PM  Permalink
u r absolutely obsolete Sridhar!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First born is God's first gift
by Politician on Jun 22, 2007 03:21 PM  Permalink
First Born is not God's Gift. It is the Frustation of the Couple after controlling sex for the whole life before marriage.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:First born is God's first gift
by vishwas patil on Jun 22, 2007 03:18 PM  Permalink
is it ?

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
MISS LEADING RESEARCH
by Vishwamitra Singh on Jun 22, 2007 03:03 PM  Permalink 

people select wrong tools and then publish their ill perceived view on the subject. IQ has much wider ramification than just being born first. Wrong assumption like Johnson and Johnson will lead to wrong conclusions

    Forward  |  Report abuse
IQ and order of birth
by Sampath S on Jun 22, 2007 03:00 PM  Permalink 

I will not be surprised if another study totally contradicts this and concludes that the youngest sibling is the most successful with high EQ and high SQ. One can improve his/her IQ score by taking more tests; I think, the researchers first draw the conclusion and then fit the data to suit.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Stupid Researchers!!!
by rohit gupta on Jun 22, 2007 02:59 PM  Permalink 

I have always seen the opposite of what these researchers have found. People have given good examples before me to prove it. List is long.
Watch 'Home Alone' to know more. :)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
wrong research....
by Lawrence Novva on Jun 22, 2007 02:55 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I strongly feel there is a major flaw in this research. There are many many incidences where the youngest sibling is always smarter than the oldest one. Measuring IQ in most cases are determined relatively with other siblings in the same family when compared to their age groups. This research is certainly an eye-brow raiser and a big surprise to me.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:wrong research....
by Politician on Jun 22, 2007 03:07 PM  Permalink
I agree with you cent percent

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:wrong research....
by polyshots on Jun 22, 2007 02:59 PM  Permalink
not true in many cases sometimes the middle kids outsmart the first one.research has to be all over again

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:wrong research....
by Susheel Bhat on Jun 22, 2007 03:07 PM  Permalink
u r the funniest, you r the middle one? You should have asked your parents to stop production once u were born! heheheheh

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Firstborns
by Gopi Menon on Jun 22, 2007 02:53 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is possbly true in many instances.

But often the elder ones are more idealistic whereas the junior siblings tend to be practical-reason being that while the first borns have to negotiate with ELDERS (since no other peers are available in a Nuclear Family)and PARENTS for their demands,the second (and third and soon) children can easily learn to negotiate with their elder brother/sister who may be 2-4 years senior only ,and Physically much less formidable.

This builds the negotiating and social skills of the non firsts,while the first borns sometimes perform better in highly intellectual or intuitive ,or even even quirky,environments.

Being a first born,my own observation is that it is the (situational )positive expectation by the family environment that helps them better in their areas.That also explains why those second borns whose elders died ,also improved performance.

In essence everything ,putting aside Karma theory for a moment,is the result of social programming ,including the "stroking",that the child undergoes...remember Eric Berne's "Transactional Analysis"?

Regards

V.I.G.Menon


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Firstborns
by ARK on Jun 22, 2007 03:06 PM  Permalink
Your article is a BIG BOUNCER. It will require an IQ level of above 500 to understand your remarks.
Rediff discussion board does not have such highly intelligent and knowledgeable members. Hence , please write in a manner understandable like KISS.
K - Keep
I - It
S - Simple
S - Stupid

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Firstborns
by Susheel Bhat on Jun 22, 2007 03:10 PM  Permalink
ARK .... u sound like SRK.... i bet must be the last sibling and if u claim to be the first, then ur parents are hiding something from u.....hehehhehe

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Firstborns
by Susheel Bhat on Jun 22, 2007 03:02 PM  Permalink
Dude.... only your comment is fair enough and that goes to prove u r a first born like me! hehehheee

   Forward   |   Report abuse
wat a time pass article!!!
by Surabhi Jain on Jun 22, 2007 02:52 PM  Permalink 

lets do a research work to prove the opposite!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 142 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7   Older >
Write a message