Guruvayoor devaswaom was forced to apologize because the people turned against punyaham. DYFI started an agitation against it and it was forced to budge. Temple is a public place managed by the government and Caste and religion based treatment is a criminal offence. Is Hindu gods so narrow minded that they cannot even stand a person from another religion.
RE:Apology
by Nandish on Jun 14, 2007 08:45 AM Permalink
hi sunil, don't post some crap here. wud u allow a person who is not from ur religion to enter ur pooja room? off course not... in all probability, even if u do so, it has to be only at ur home and not in a public place.
RE:Apology
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 02:49 AM Permalink
When a person from another religion, doesn't believe in the ways of the Hindu God, why does he/she want to enter into his home? Is it a tourism place?
RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by Inadvertently Human on Jun 14, 2007 02:20 AM Permalink
Haha...he is some converted neo-Xian dumba&& who cant say Shri Valmiki and Ramanyan in the same line. Just ignore him.
RE:RE:RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by Sreee on Jun 14, 2007 03:46 AM Permalink
History becomes legend, legend becomes myth. That%u2019s the rule of time.
This is exactly the reason why knowledge was denied to some. A learned man can not waste his time arguing endlessly to a closed narrow mind! Besides knowledge is powerful. A knife is dangerous on the hands of a kid for himself!!
RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 02:28 AM Permalink
"Valmiki" -- Its not "ValmUki" -- Ha .ha.. This shows your depth in Hinduism..
And - Valmiki wrote Ramayan or Ramayan wrote Valmiki ?
RE:RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 02:42 AM Permalink
Right. But your question says "who wrote Valmiki". And you did nt answer - what was Valmiki's real name?
RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by Nandish on Jun 14, 2007 08:49 AM Permalink
hey u bloody blaster, we r talking abt allowing or not allowing a non-hindu to temple and we r not talking abt Ramayan etc etc. think twice before u post any such comments.
RE:RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 02:45 AM Permalink
No Mate.
They are very much real. Please go to Gyanaganj near manasarovar to experience the truth. Its true that.. Shri Sankaracharya entered the body of the king and came back. Thats real knowledge. There are still people alive who can do that.
Its not comedy. Its truth and some symbolism. A person having 10 heads - means a person having the intelligence of 10 heads.. coliqually translated for a common man. Monkeys building the bridge - Please search for - "Adam's Bridge" in google.
You dont want to believe it because of the limited scope of your science (Physics/Chemistry/Biology), that doesnt have the scope to prove it.
You can realize he truth in it, only if you want to. If you close your eyes, you can never see light ..
RE:A doubt? who wrote Valmuki?
by shivendra jha on Jun 14, 2007 08:54 AM Permalink
dear surajit,
Maharshi Valmiki was a robber before meeting saptrashis. his name was rathakar. he accepted his mistake and had a heavy tapasya. he got this name becouse deemak made their caves on his body. in sanatan dharma, there is two way of life, first sansarik life and the other is sanyas. sanyasi means a person who has no caste. he is a devotee to god.
RE:Time Hindus stopped being so apologetic...
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 01:37 AM Permalink
Its Because they are "Hindus" (non-aggressive, non-barbaric, compassionate and tolerant), they are being treated like this.
Have you seen a Brahmin next door. Do he have any arrogance. Do he play any terroist activities and try to some thing to state. Do he try to not be friendly or like a normal human. The Brahmin arrogance, Brahmin dominace is all created by some crooked Media fanatics.Just understand reality.
RE:Have you looked at next door Brahmin
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 01:40 AM Permalink
A Brahmin can never think of killing someone. Whats the proportion of Criminals in India, belonging to each caste and religion?
Is any more proof wanted to prove that Brahmins are a superior race ?
i dont see any wrong doing on the part of tantri.. he merely followed the rules. the devaswom act enacted in 1937 has this clause and he merely implemented it.. let them change the rules if they dont want it happen in future instead of cribbing abt it..
PS: be prepared for a backlash if any hindu specific law is enacted.
Any idea if non-christians are allowed in vatican??
RE:not a mistake of tantri
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 01:36 AM Permalink
I dont understand, whats wrong in not allowing people of Other religions to Hindu Temples. People who are against this, Can you say - do you allow everyone to your homes?
RE:not a mistake of tantri
by Blaster on Jun 14, 2007 01:22 AM Permalink
Non christians are always welcomed in any chruch and also in vatican. Even Hindu temples overseas have no restrictions.
RE:not a mistake of tantri
by True Indian on Jun 14, 2007 01:31 AM Permalink
even hindu temples in india has no restriction as such.. we have a rule allowing non-hindus not to enter temples only at a few states like kerala and orissa.. grow up and stop all the bashing..
RE:not a mistake of tantri
by Surajit Dash on Jun 14, 2007 01:37 AM Permalink
And, Why people of other religions are so interested to enter Hindu temples?
RE:not a mistake of tantri
by True Indian on Jun 14, 2007 01:48 AM Permalink
why are muslim women not allowed at mosques..why isn't civil code not applicable to muslims..
why do christian missionaries go door by door to preach their relegion..
let govt answer all these questions before they introduce a new law
RE:not a mistake of tantri
by shivendra jha on Jun 14, 2007 09:05 AM Permalink
anyone can practice and preach his religion but nobody can change the religion of other by force, greed and other manners except will of person. christian missionery are involve in conversion through force and money. it is not acceptable.
Ravi is married to Christian and so if the temple rituals require purification, it has the right to do so. This is no different from what the church does in the name of baptisation...why don't these sundry politicians question the church and take action against it?
RE:temple purification is no different from christian baptisation
by Sreee on Jun 14, 2007 01:04 AM Permalink
you have a wery wrong idea about both the things!
RE:RE:temple purification is no different from christian baptisation
by True Indian on Jun 14, 2007 01:30 AM Permalink
sree. its u that has a wrong idea.. anil is right..
RE:temple purification is no different from christian baptisation
by Bhaumik on Jul 05, 2007 05:35 PM Permalink
True Indian(?). it's you and Abil who have the wrong idea. Sree is right.
