This formation, whether manmade or natural, should be preserved for it's historical and archeological importance, if not for it's mythological existence.
Get a refreshing thought at http://mind-blogs.blogspot.com
Why are you obsessed with putting something in the back. You have posted the same comment multiple times. Either you are intellectually challenged or you are gay.
ok my secular friends just destroy ram setu as u want but think who ll get the banifit of tht.its only shipping companies.they will earn even more profit by going through short route. i doubt that profit can b passed to indian businessmen.and think by destroying the ram setu what a common man will get.its nothing its a only problem of shipping companies and businessmen
By suggesting that Lord Ram & Co chose to fill an entire stretch of sea with mud and stone to cross it instead of choosing to simply cross it using boats, reactionary forces are trying to downgrade the intelligence and technical expertise of Our Lord. So guys be careful of the intentions of these firangi US NGOs.
RE:RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by Vivek Jeyakumar on Jun 11, 2007 07:24 PM Permalink
If that Monkey (Homonuman) can carry a Mountain, he could have brought Seetha to his Lord Rama or could carry all that monkeys in that same hill with Rama to Lanka.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by on Jun 11, 2007 07:56 PM Permalink
Hello Vivek
I don%u2019t know who is given your name as Vivek, you are an idiot. If you know Ramayana you wont talk nonsense. I know you must be a Muslim or Christian, don%u2019t hide behind Hindu name. If you are really born to your father come out with real name.
RE:RE:RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by on Jun 11, 2007 07:34 PM Permalink
Hi Jeyakumar, normally all the warrors will attack once yaar, not one at a time, first know the war tactics and then post a comment, he can carry one or two at a time but not thousand of people think possitively, being a hindu don't think gainst to hinduism
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by Bhishma Bharadwaj on Jun 11, 2007 07:39 PM Permalink
You moron, read Ramayana first. Hanuman does tell Sita that he can take her back right away. She refuses to go with him saying Ravana needs to be destroyed because she is not the only one to be rescued ... there are many more. To save people in such huge numbers requires the empire to be brought down.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by on Jun 11, 2007 07:31 PM Permalink
Hi Tilak, what a brain yaar, how ur thinking yaar, do u know how many ships they need inorder to cross the sea and to fight agaist ravana? rama gave life to all he is more brilliant than what u r thinking, he knows the advantages and disadvantages, so he built that. think possitively.
hi frenz let us not blame anyone or each other or for any matter,any religon.........,people read them and are influenced by the thoughts so let us not give them the path of hatred by any means.No religion in the world preaches hatred for fellow men.
ok my secular friends just destroy ram setu as u want but think who ll get the banifit of tht.its only shipping companies.they will earn even more profit by going through short route. i doubt that profit can b passed to indian businessmen.and think by destroying the ram setu what a common man will get.its nothing its a only problem of shipping companies and businessmen
By suggesting that Lord Ram & Co chose to fill an entire stretch of sea with mud and stone to cross it instead of choosing to simply cross it using boats, reactionary forces are trying to downgrade the intelligence and technical expertise of Our Lord. So guys be careful of the intentions of these firangi US NGOs.
Why was the route of Metro passing 'close' Qutub Minar in New Delhi was abandoned and later reworked fearing prospective damages to this 815 years man made monument?
Why the project of Taj corridor (which would have made lot of dollars to our money minded govt) was put off after the hue and cry of environmentalists as the construction near Taj 'may' cause bad effect on this 359 years old man made monument. Please give attention here that these monuments were not going to be destroyed but were 'feared' to get damaged.
Will any government in China would destroy or even alter The great wall of China(2695 years old) for the sake of any amount of money?
Will any one allow pulling down 4507 years old Pyramids of Egypt in lieu of any uncountable amount of money?
If the answer is NO, then why this 17,25,000 years old man made monument is being destroyed for the sake of some
RE:ram setu
by blue wrox on Jun 11, 2007 07:06 PM Permalink
because all the rest is made by man.This is not.Its in our waters.Why dont you jump in and get evidence that its built by man?
RE:ram setu
by Elas Kumar on Jun 11, 2007 07:21 PM Permalink
Leave it whether it is man made or not.... Let speak that it is created naturally.... If you believe natural formation has some reasons then first explore the reason why should nature form these kind of sand patches... Tsunami effect were less on indian shore even because of these kind of sand patches formed in Bay of Bengal (I am not sticking only with Ram Sethu for Tsunami)....
Sure Sethu Project is going to be worthsome (Long term benefit) when water transport is going to increase because of import and export..
But give a serious thought on these sand fills out of box thinking question why nature has created why nature has created...
If scientifically proved it is man made then protect it as a old age monuement...
RE:ram setu
by guru on Jun 11, 2007 07:22 PM Permalink
From where do you bring the evidence for all historical facts. You need to belive and one should respect it.
By suggesting that Lord Ram & Co chose to fill an entire stretch of sea with mud and stone to cross it instead of choosing to simply cross it using boats, reactionary forces are trying to downgrade the intelligence and technical expertise of Our Lord. So guys be careful of the intentions of these firangi US NGOs.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by Indian Analyst on Jun 11, 2007 07:15 PM Permalink
They needed to carry an army and weapons. Why does the army have engineers to build bridges ? Maybe they needed to carry heavy chariots etc ... who knows. The point is: If it is archaelogically important, it should be saved. Making it a tourist destination with glass bottom boats is an excellent idea. Most of the people here are opposing just because it's called the rama bridge.
RE:please tell me the truth
by pradeep venkataraman on Jun 11, 2007 07:00 PM Permalink
In his incarnation as Rama, the supreme lord intended to set ideals for man. This avatar was devoid of any divine powers unlike the Krishna Avatar. In fact Rama was helped by various deities at various instances. In Sundara Kanda, Hanuman offers to carry Sita along with entire Trikuta to Rama. Sita explains to Hanuman that it wudn't bring any glory to her Lord, who must defeat Ravana in a battle and set ideals for the mankind.
