Have some respect for ancient monuments, Ramayana clearly states that rocks which float on water were used in the construction of the bridge or setu. The Ram setu indeed is made of Coral Rocks. Coral Rocks do float on water and if you had the quantity of Coral rocks with you today, even you can build a bridge. Its a simple case of respect for Lord Ram and respect for ancient monuments versus the poisionous Hatefull Perriyarist anti Hinduism propoganda which hated anything that had anything to do with Lord Rama.
You cant escape the thought that DMK is indeed a political party, an ideology or followers of Perriyar which garlands Lord Ramas picture with Chappals and for them to respect a monnument of Lord Rama is indeed tough, so whatever explanation that anyone gives in "demoloshing" the Rama setu , comes only from this hateful preposition.
The Egyptians are Muslims yet they have retained the ancient Pyramids of Egypt, because they belive that's their historic Legacy..!
There is a saying...Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.!!!
RE:tamils are all mader*chod pi*gs.
by Srini Pamidimukkala on Jun 11, 2007 08:58 PM Permalink
Hello kjsbddfksjb, do you know how many hindus are there in Tamilnadu? There are so many great temples in South and they are being protected very well. There was and there is huge hindu literature being produced in south. How can you say all Tamils are anti-hindu. You are totally wrong. Please correct yourself first and then comment about others.
RE:tamils are all mader*chod pi*gs.
by Sriram Vangal on Jun 11, 2007 09:21 PM Permalink
It is a fact that hinduism still exists in India only because of the tamils, when all north indian cowards caved in to muslim pressure and forgot their culture. Let no one forget that, even for a moment.
RE:tamils are all mader*chod pi*gs.
by santosh on Jun 11, 2007 10:43 PM Permalink
srini you are damn right north indians think that all south indians are antihindus but alas the south indians are more hindu then north indians if you calculate the number of atheists you will find them more in north than in south soouth indians tend to be more silent and peace loving and we historically had lesser damage done to us by muslims thats the reason we tend to be more silent,but as we have shown the north by selecting more bjp mlas in karnataka we aare coming to true terms as we are feeling the heat of Muslims in south india so its wrong to say all south indians aare antihindus .please coome and visit south india you will find more beautiful temples here than anywhere.
Rama built the bridge for saving Sita from Ravana. If Indian government is demolishing it for future and current security reasons like fast moving of war ships in case of war with our unrelenting enemies, I guess Rama will agree for demolishing the bridge. If US or some other country who never accepted Hinduism as a religion at all (they call hindus pagans, which is absurd) and still calls Hanuman a monkey god and laughs at Monkey jumping over the sea is telling to keep protect the bridge, I doubt their motives. I say we have to take some realistic approach but not be overwhemmed by our emotions here.
RE:If it is for Security, Rama also will agree for demolition
by SUNDARAM RAMAMURTHY on Jun 11, 2007 08:57 PM Permalink
Ram & Laxman saved the Grand Lake at Madurantagam and appeared before the British Collector. So, now Ram would save his own Bridge.
JIS HINDU KA KHOON NA KHOLE KHOON NAHIN VO PANI HAI,due to these secular hindus one day Muslims(Rawana of Kalyug) will take our sisters and mothers from our houses and these secular hindus will try to negoiate and try to build up a more secular Indian State.
O ! Sons of RAM and KRISHNA please wake and protect your culture and religion.
PUKARTA TUME VATAN PUKARTI MAA BHARTI KHOON SE TILAK KARO GOLLIYION SE AARTI. JAI SRI RAM
By suggesting that Lord Ram & Co chose to fill an entire stretch of sea with mud and stone to cross it instead of choosing to simply cross it using boats, reactionary forces are trying to downgrade the intelligence and technical expertise of Our Lord. Even Guha, the tribal guy who helped Lord Ram & Co to cross Ganges had boats. Does that mean the Rishi Valmiki goofed up logic while composing Ramayana. Of course u can cross rivers by building bridges in the because no river is broader than a few kilometers or much less. Has any army built bridge in the ocean that too over a deep ocean of 30 miles? Probably these guys might want to denigrate our Lord Ram by announcing it as a World Wonder saying that "only person in the world to have built a bridge in the ocean to take army instead of using ships". So guys be careful of the intentions of these firangi US NGOs.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by BostonPunekar on Jun 11, 2007 07:55 PM Permalink
have respect for ancient monnuments, Ramayana clearly says that rocks which float on water were used in the construction of the bridge or setu. The Ram setu indeed is made of Coral Rocks. Coral Rocks do float on water and if you had the quantity of Coral rocks with you today. even you can build a bridge. Its a simple case of respect for Lord Ram and respect for ancient monuments versus teh poisionous Hatefull Perriyarist anti Hinduism propoganda which hated anything that had anything to do with Lord Ram.
You can escape a political party, an ideology or followers of Perriyar which garlands Lord Ramas picture with Chappals to respect a monnument of Lord Rama, so whatever explanation that anyone gives in "demoloshing" the Rama setu , comes only from this hateful preposition.
The Ram Setu is a man made monument which is as old and historic as the Pyramids of Egypt, or the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Its a bridge partially submerged under water constructed out of Coral Rocks. Ancient Ramayana scripts indicate that the bridge builders used rocks which floated on water to create a bridge in the sea. Coral stones indeed float on water, and if u had the quantity of coral rocks even you can build a bridge using that even today. There is no rocket science or Mythology in that but pure respect to historic man made structures.
Just for information :-
1> When the Aswan Dam and the created Lake Naseer was supposed to submerge the partial ruins of the great Pyramids of Egypt, billions of dollars were spent in carefully cutting the ruins and rebuilding at a higher dry land, just for this reason.
2> The Kutub Minar was in the way of the underground of Delhi Metro, but the route allignment was changed to safely navigate around the Kutub Minar.
3> The entire Aero zone over the Taj Mahal in Agra is a no fly zone.
4> Harrapa, Mohenjadaro, ruins of Nalanda University, ruins of Bodh Gaya, ruins of Sanchi Stupa , ruins of Dwarka city are all pride of Indian history and Indian historic legacy.
Hence it is simply out of that respect for Indian History and Indian Legacy that the Ram Setu must be preserved at all costs.
By suggesting that Lord Ram & Co chose to fill an entire stretch of sea with mud and stone to cross it instead of choosing to simply cross it using boats, reactionary forces are trying to downgrade the intelligence and technical expertise of Our Lord. Even Guha, the tribal guy who helped Lord Ram & Co to cross Ganges had boats. Does that mean the Rishi Valmiki goofed up logic while composing Ramayana. So guys be careful of the intentions of these firangi US NGOs.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by Bhishma Bharadwaj on Jun 11, 2007 07:37 PM Permalink
Have some sense in what you write. That way every army can use boats to cross the rivers in J&K rather than build bridges. You have equipment and supplies to take which is not feasible by boats!
RE:RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by BostonPunekar on Jun 11, 2007 07:59 PM Permalink
have some respect for ancient monnuments, Ramayana clearly says that rocks which float on water were used in the construction of the bridge or setu. The Ram setu indeed is made of Coral Rocks. Coral Rocks do float on water and if you had the quantity of Coral rocks with you today. even you can build a bridge. Its a simple case of respect for Lord Ram and respect for ancient monuments versus teh poisionous Hatefull Perriyarist anti Hinduism propoganda which hated anything that had anything to do with Lord Ram.
You cant escape the thought that it is indeed a political party, an ideology or followers of Perriyar which garlands Lord Ramas picture with Chappals to respect a monnument of Lord Rama, so whatever explanation that anyone gives in "demoloshing" the Rama setu , comes only from this hateful preposition
There is a saying...Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.!!!
