See how brahmins take over dravid property , heritage, literature and culture.
They used Siva, and swastik as connection point. What if I write my name of your house with paint and that house becomes mine!!!
No wonder even today most of south Indian vedic(hindu) brahmin dominated temples are original dravids and Jain temples. Try few temples by yourself by uncovering idols which are heavily jewelled , garlanded and projected with foreign articles on the structure, (somethng which is not usual in North indian hindu Gods).
99% of OLD TEMPLES IN SOUTH ARE ORIGINALLY DRAVID TEMPLES WHICH WERE TAKEN OVER BY BHAKTI MOVEMENT BY KILLING THOUSANDS OF DRAVIDS.
Shankaracharya was much more worse in South than Gajanavi/babar in North. There is book called " Gundaism of shankaracharya" which will prove all the facts. Even ASI will substantiate all the facts with evidences.
i don't think I would ever by back to Brahmin/vedic fraud cult.
Re: Ramsethu is product of vedic horseplay
by Rohit Nair on Mar 09, 2009 11:06 AM Permalink
I think you are the one lost in identity illusions, Shankaracharya is the one who came out with the beautiful and true concept of Advaitham. It seems that you have hardly given time to philosophical pursuits. There has been more evolution in India than revolution.
Preservation will be much more beneficial than destruction. Tourists will flock to the area for seeing unique coorals and marine habitation. It will also give time in future for proper study to be carried out.
Do you want me to believe krishna married to 16008 girls!! It is like Krishna married to one whole small town where all girls lived. How many rooms required , or how many houses required for 16008 wives. Mind you there are only 365 days in a year. It need 43 years for Krishna to take care of their sexual need once in life time, provided he can take care of one girl per day without any break for 43 years..... Do you want me to believe this????
Give me a break......I wouldn't believe even if BJP, or Congress, Or VHP or Shankaracharya tells me 1000 times a day. You cannot expect IIT , IIMs or ASI to vouch this non-historical events. Ram Ramayan, Ganesha, all those non-historical events cannot be believed or taken for granted as offficial.
RE:Can you believe Ram existed?
by Sanjay Dinkar Jamdade on Oct 08, 2007 12:13 AM Permalink
Krishna can satisfy all girls at the same time my foolish brother! He need not have physical sex with them. come to ISKCON we shall tell you the deep spiritual secrets!
RE:RE:Can you believe Ram existed?
by on Oct 19, 2007 01:37 PM Permalink
To be married in this context does not mean wedded in the present day sense involving physical sex. thinking of this episode itself you have become one of krishna's wives!
RE:SHAME ON INDIANS
by Ramasubbu on Oct 10, 2007 01:10 PM Permalink
Where did Ram or any vedic god exists? They are all brahminic harry potter characters?
What you want to protect? something which never exists. ASI has proved there were no vedic gods. All vedic gods are just concepts no reality.
RE:SHAME ON INDIANS
by bigfacts on Sep 21, 2007 12:23 AM Permalink
There was RAM only if there is real spiderman, or real superman.Total historical frauds by Brahmins(aryans)
U think all ur research is right? and keep abusing hinduism? i think u r someway or the other affected by hinduism.If u stand in front of sun and close your eyes.it would will be too dark and u cant see anything...but thats only for you not for others.others will continue to enjoy its light (without darkness) unlike you.who will alone shout i cant see anything... understand that and please get out of our country as quickly as possible.I think you r too confused and enlightned to live among us. go go abroad where u can find good gods.marry women from other place( definetly no a hindu please) and then you know she will run away from u one day and then you will say...india is the best place to live in...only bcoz of its culture and heritage.If you follow vedas correctly...there will be no harm to the entire humanity.unlike western and islamic world where materialistic abundance and worldly pleasure only speaks for a man. why do you think foreigners come to india?? They say indians are very hospitable and lovely,friendly and social people to be with and all rituals done here are eco-friendly and will reflect cycle of life(esp.human life) your forefathers either didnt know how to teach you the values we cherish about our religion...or they didnt know what it means...so please stop blabbering and get sensible....you cant win if u have skewed view about your own country...i pity you and the teachers who taught you this...
Dear friends Educated upper middle class either located in Silicon Valley or in filthy metros of India are bent upon insulting and painting a backward picture of India. By indulging in this Ram Sethu controversy they are trying to paint a negative picture of Lord Ram and Indian Civilization...just think these guys are arguing Lord Rama built a bridge using floating rocks. Won't even an illiterate labourer from Bihar ask back then why did those rocks sink and formed sand dunes there. He might even ask us bring those rocks and put in river Ganges that flows through his village. Or he might even question then why can't u use those rocks to bring connectivity between Andaman islands instead of destroying the homelands of Jarawa tribes for the benefit of mainland settlers. Why they practice nano technology for livelihood and putting their entire weight in defence of irrational stories that will only spoil the reputation of ancient Indian Civilization and our Hindu heritage.I think This oldest, Longest,Manmad bridge should be counted as a sevan wonders.Govt. of India shoud take intiative for this noble cause.: Ramesh Tripathi.Mayur Vihar
Educated upper middle class either located in Silicon Valley or in filthy metros of India are bent upon insulting and painting a backward picture of India. By indulging in this Ram Sethu controversy they are trying to paint a negative picture of Lord Ram and Indian Civilization...just think these guys are arguing Lord Rama built a bridge using floating rocks. Won't even an illiterate labourer from Bihar ask back then why did those rocks sink and formed sand dunes there. He might even ask us bring those rocks and put in river Ganges that flows through his village. Or he might even question then why can't u use those rocks to bring connectivity between Andaman islands instead of destroying the homelands of Jarawa tribes for the benefit of mainland settlers. Why they practice nano technology for livelihood and putting their entire weight in defence of irrational stories that will only spoil the reputation of ancient Indian Civilization and our Hindu heritage.
I would like to quote a similar case in 1958 for which the Supreme Court has given the following judgement..(AIR 1958 Supreme Court 1032)
%u201C%u2026. Any object however trivial or destitute of real value in itself if regarded as sacred by any class of persons would come within the meaning of the penal section (295 of Indian Penal Code). Nor is it absolutely necessary that the object, in order to be held sacred, should have been actually worshipped. An object may be held sacred by a class of persons without being worshipped by them. It is clear, therefore, that the courts below were rather cynical in so lightly brushing aside the religious susceptibilities of that class of persons to which the complainant claims to belong. The section has been intended to respect the religious susceptibilities of persons of different religious persuasions or creeds. Courts have got to be very circumspect in such matters, and to pay due regard to the feelings and religious emotions of different classes of persons with different beliefs, irrespective of the consideration whether or not they share those beliefs, or whether they are rational or otherwise, in the opinion of the court.%u201D
By suggesting that Lord Ram & Co chose to fill an entire stretch of sea with mud and stone to cross it instead of choosing to simply cross it using boats, reactionary forces are trying to downgrade the intelligence and technical expertise of Our Lord. Even Guha, the tribal guy who helped Lord Ram & Co to cross Ganges had boats. Does that mean the Rishi Valmiki goofed up logic while composing Ramayana. Of course u can cross rivers by building bridges in the because no river is broader than a few kilometers or much less. Has any army built bridge in the ocean that too over a deep ocean of 30 miles? Probably these guys might want to denigrate our Lord Ram by announcing it as a World Wonder saying that "only person in the world to have built a bridge in the ocean to take army instead of using ships". So guys be careful of the intentions of these firangi US NGOs.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by Pankaj J on Sep 15, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
EVEN IN TODAYS MODERN MILITARY YOU NEED BRIDGES TO CROSS, U CAN'T PUT BOATS EVERYWHERE, PRINCIPLE OF WARFARE NEEDS CONCENTRATION OF FORCES AND THE TOOO HIGH RISK PF PUTTING YOUR ARMY IN BOATS JUST FOR ENEMY TO SINK IT.
RE:Nothing to do with heritage! only insult to Lord Ram
by Manikandan Thirumoorthy on Sep 27, 2007 05:38 PM Permalink
U think all ur research is right? and keep abusing hinduism? i think u r someway or the other affected by hinduism.If u stand in front of sun and close your eyes.it would will be too dark and u cant see anything...but thats only for you not for others.others will continue to enjoy its light (without darkness) unlike you.who will alone shout i cant see anything... understand that and please get out of our country as quickly as possible.I think you r too confused and enlightned to live among us. go go abroad where u can find good gods.marry women from other place( definetly no a hindu please) and then you know she will run away from u one day and then you will say...india is the best place to live in...only bcoz of its culture and heritage.If you follow vedas correctly...there will be no harm to the entire humanity.unlike western and islamic world where materialistic abundance and worldly pleasure only speaks for a man. why do you think foreigners come to india?? They say indians are very hospitable and lovely,friendly and social people to be with and all rituals done here are eco-friendly and will reflect cycle of life(esp.human life) your forefathers either didnt know how to teach you the values we cherish about our religion...or they didnt know what it means...so please stop blabbering and get sensible....you cant win if u have skewed view about your own country...i pity you and the teachers who taught you this...
