I didnt understand the current Indian China row, why should we send a Arunachal Candidate to China when the territory is disputed and under discussion, shouldn't both sides be neutral till the issue is resolved? Isn't it bit naive to send a person from the disputed area as our own when the talks are still going on? China accepted all the IAS candidates visiting Beijing except the Aranuchal one, was it wise on our part to send a candidate from the disputed area and expect China not to say anything? It would be only natural for the disputing party not to accept any transaction from the disputed territory as it would render the discussions meaningless. Why are we acting like we didnt know that!!!
RE:china
by Rajdeep on Jun 07, 2007 03:54 PM Permalink
Dear Karthik Sometimes ignorance is bliss. BTW neutrality is best for those for those who don't have a mind. Regards
RE:china
by manoj joshi on Jun 07, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
India is Democratic country, We Have freedom to Send any person which having Indian natinality, who is china to to restrict person from indian State.
RE:china
by Ramprakash Naidu on Jun 07, 2007 02:42 PM Permalink
Dear Karthik, You have a house and somebody claims it is his house,then will u stay outside that house till the dispute is cleared? Dont go by legal way, where real politik is involved. China is using Arunachal pradesh issue to leverage on Aksaichin area and the area ceded by Pakistan to them, from Occupied Kashmir (or so called Azad Kashmir).
