Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1467 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
gfg
by raja on Jun 07, 2007 10:01 AM  Permalink 

fgf

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:SHUT DOWN ALL HINDU TEMPLES
by $Ronaldo$ on Jun 07, 2007 10:05 AM  Permalink
Are u still alive. I thought you were captured by the US Army. They are after your Kidney

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SHUT DOWN ALL HINDU TEMPLES
by sanghmitra on Jun 07, 2007 10:07 AM  Permalink
and Open our Mecca (Shiv Temple)to us!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SHUT DOWN ALL HINDU TEMPLES
by Shyam S. on Jun 07, 2007 10:07 AM  Permalink
why you shut your mouth and to to pakistan.

you son of sult

   Forward   |   Report abuse
WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by L KINI on Jun 07, 2007 09:56 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

ANY PLACE OF WORSHIP IS SACRED TO EVERY BELIEVER OF THEAT RELIGION, WHY ALL ARE BEHIND HINDU TEMPLES ONLY,WILL OTHER RELIGIONS AGREE FOR SAME WITH THEIR PLACE OF WORSHIP, WILL PARSIS ALLOW OTHERS IN THEIR FIRE TEMPLE, WILL ISMAIL MUSLIMS ALLOW SUNNIS IN THEIR MOSQUE, WILL SHITES AGREE WITH SUNNI MUSLIMS, WILL CATHOLICS GO CORDIALLY WITH PROSTESTANTS.
EVERY RELIGIONS HAVE SOME CONSTRAINTS, SO IF ANY LAW TO BE PROMULGATED THEN IT SHOULD BE APPLICABLE TO ALL PLACE OF WORSHIPS

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by Sameer on Jun 07, 2007 10:07 AM  Permalink
Excuse me Ignorant,

In churches any christian can enter n worship, Christian god doesnt need a shower after that.

In India u can see muslims from Shia n sunni praying the same mosques.

If the god gets dirty when a low caste hindu enters the temple or a non hindu enters, that means, the Gods hand is dirty becoz he created them.

Else u can say muslims and Christians were created by different Gods and up in the heaven they have a liason committee to decide on creation.

Think before u deliver

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by sunilgiri on Jun 07, 2007 10:11 AM  Permalink
Hindu mandir and monotheistic houses of worship are never similar. The mandir is literally god%u2019s palace; it is built according to shastric specifications, and once the images are consecrated it means the gods have accepted the invitation to reside in the respective temples. This is what gave temples their power and sanctity in all ancient traditions.

In monotheistic traditions, the synagogue, church and mosque are houses of congregation where the respective gods are remembered in community worship. But monotheistic gods do not descend from their heavenly abodes to dwell with the believers, even during the hour of worship. This is an important distinction, because the congregation itself has no special sanctity, and can meet anywhere. Hindu tradition, on the other hand, shares divinity with the believers, because man is made of the same atman as Parambrahman.
Mandirs thus belong to god and the devotee

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by sumit dey on Jun 07, 2007 10:00 AM  Permalink
Bravo...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by SHAHRUKH NIZAMI on Jun 07, 2007 10:02 AM  Permalink
Because any Parsi can enter their temple, like wise any ismaili can enter their mosque, any sunni can enter and any shites can also enter their mosque. If you dont know please ask them did they have any difference in entering to the holy mosques of Mecca and Madina. FIRST GET KNOWLEDGE AND THEN SPEAK. They dont divide muslims on caste system as hindus divide. GOT IT???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by sunilgiri on Jun 07, 2007 10:05 AM  Permalink
YEah there is no difference in Shyas and Sunnys they simply kill each other in Pakistan , Iraq etc.. SO you feel it is really nice is it MR SHAHRUKH NIZAMI ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by SHAHRUKH NIZAMI on Jun 07, 2007 10:10 AM  Permalink
Yeah.. Brothers fight each other. There is nothing new in that.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by abdul hameed on Jun 07, 2007 10:20 AM  Permalink

your post is full of misconceptions. Haj is a prayer not a place where muslims prohibit others. How many non muslim want to perform this prayer, Haj.

Who told you non arabs can not be buried in arab. many of those who die there are brought back to India becoz they and their relatives have wished them to buru in their 'watan' i.e nation.
Islamic practices do not want to demean you, if you take it otherwise its your misconception.

Lots of propaganda is going on there against muslims, try to know truth instead of becoming part of propaganda machinery.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by Srinivasan K on Jun 07, 2007 10:13 AM  Permalink
What a statement!!! True statements...By the way you have missed some statements...there is no difference in Terrorism whether you throw bombs on others are make yourself Suicide bomber, it screws happiness of many. Don't give statements as if you are people are having best of knowledge. Hindu's do not kill people, they are not terrorists. They are fighting for their minimal rights. GUY's please reply back to this ignorant.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:WHY TARGET ONLY HINDU TEMPLES
by rajesh pandey on Jun 07, 2007 10:19 AM  Permalink
religious matters are associated with sentiments.Sentiments can not be ruled by law.Whether they are Muslims or others they all have certain rules as per their mythology.
If you place a close look neither Mosque or any holy places allows free entry of all casts/religions

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mandirs are only for god and devotees not for tourists.
by sunilgiri on Jun 07, 2007 09:55 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Once again Hindu mandir has become the focus of secular controversy.
Since hindu religion has an unorganized structure politicians clearly know that hindus will never become a vote bank, and ironically whoever supports hindus cause will be termed as Saffronists and Fanatics . Hindu%u2019s receive second class privilages in a country where they are the Majority.
All the governments steal the temples they use the hindu devotees offerings to give discount to Hajj travelers . When any third rate politician wants lime light they simply target the hindu institutions.
The custodians of each holy site must have the right to decide who shall be permitted entry. At Pushkar, priests hitherto permitted foreigners in the sacred precincts and then discovered them acting contrary to the sanctity of the place. They have now prepared a code of conduct for outsiders. It is humbling to recall that the great Vaishnava acharya, Haridas Thakur, being born in a Muslim family, never tried to enter the Jagannath mandir at Puri, even though many persons wanted him to have darshan. I believe this is because he felt he should be born as a Hindu in order to enter the temple. Even Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, personally a very devout Hindu, was denied entry to the Puri temple because she married a Parsi and thereby shared that identity. She accepted the decision with grace and withdrew.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Mandirs are only for god and devotees not for tourists.
by raja on Jun 07, 2007 10:00 AM  Permalink
dont talk abt credibilty of gandhi family
they ahve betrayed netaji

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mandirs are only for god and devotees not for tourists.
by raj pv on Jun 07, 2007 10:26 AM  Permalink
You are totally wrong. How can you say Gandhi family betrayed Netaji. In fact they killed him, because had public known his return he would have became a national hero, a danger to Nehru.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
We don't need non-believers
by Maverick on Jun 07, 2007 09:55 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Stay away if u r not a hindu...u have no business in guruvayur...go on accept hinduism u r welcome...otherwise stop at the doors..we don't need u. Itz not a public park. Strategically speaking the membership of RSS and ABVP and BJP is gonna boost in the nxt coupla days..when this issue is raging. And the lefy govt is gonna lose allies....fools learn hard!!!!...as for a chap who states zat hindu's r no good , mild people who will never assert themselves....No worries there....our mild manners and 'peace' and appeasement orientation has gone out of the day....u start the game..and we will END IT..WITH CRUSHING FORCE...make no mistake..as to how quickly ...WE WILL BRING THIS FIGHT TO UR DOORS!!!..don't go scouting fr trouble.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:We don't need non-believers
by on Jun 07, 2007 10:57 AM  Permalink
Sri Namboodiripad should be appreciated for refusing to yield to the anti Hindu brigade.

Non Hindus like Ravi should realize that entering Hindu temples is a privilege, not a right. Commies, macoolies are other such creatures are free to open their own temple and create their own rituals, but they should not expect Hindu temples to sacrifice tradition for the sake of people whose Hindu credentials are shady.

Whether mosques or churches allow universal access is irrelevant ( I know for sure that there is at least one mosque where non Muslims are not allowed in: the Masjid Al Haram in Mecca). Our ways of worship are different.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why the law only for entry, Why not for a lower caste Priest also???
by SHAHRUKH NIZAMI on Jun 07, 2007 09:55 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

If they want to make real removal of caste system then why can't they bring a law that anyone can be a priest irrespective of any caste. Our minister should respect the laws of temple and hinduism. He shouldn't do any politics in this issue. Its a religious matter so a priest only can manage the temple, minister can't.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why the law only for entry, Why not for a lower caste Priest also???
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Jun 07, 2007 10:00 AM  Permalink


Its already there. Moreover, many Hindu saints were not brahmin.



Prime example is, Swami Vivekanand. He was not a Brahmin.



Krishna, Sri Rama, Vyasadev, Valmiki - none of them are Brahmin.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why the law only for entry, Why not for a lower caste Priest also???
by SHAHRUKH NIZAMI on Jun 07, 2007 10:07 AM  Permalink
Very funny!!!! But you still categorise them that they were not brahmin. That means they were from lower caste. So bloody caste is still there. Why dont you say all are equal? there is no difference in hindu?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why the law only for entry, Why not for a lower caste Priest also???
by Shyam S. on Jun 07, 2007 10:14 AM  Permalink
@ SHAHRUKH NIZAMI



if you want equality why there is no equality between different religion why Hindu is different then Muslim or Muslim is different then any other cast? why do you afraid of social equality? first answer this then question to others for the equality.

understand

   Forward   |   Report abuse
WHY
by durgam kumar on Jun 07, 2007 09:54 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY "REDIFF" GIVE PREFERENCE ONLY FOR ANTI-HINDU ISSUES???? I WANT TO ASK THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SHOUTING FOR "ENTRY FOR ALL IN TEMPLES" CAN THEY HAVE DARE TO DEMAND THE SAME FOR MASJID AND CHURCH??? THEY CAN'T. BECAUSE ALL OTHER RELIGION'S DOES'NT ALLOW ANYONE TO INTERFEAR IN THEIR RELIGIOUS CUSTOMS. BUT, UNFORTUNATELY SOME OF HINDU'S ALLOW IT. THAT'S WHY THIS TYPE OF ISSUES COME OUT AND DISPLAYS ON REDIFF HOME PAGE.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:WHY
by raja on Jun 07, 2007 09:58 AM  Permalink
because hindus are not slaves to anyone whereas muslim are slaves to arabs and christians are slaves to thier white masters

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Jun 07, 2007 10:02 AM  Permalink

Raja: You are a slave of Commies/Periyar:)-

make no mistake, you will be thrown out once Hindus become minority in India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why should you bring a law ?
by vani arni rao on Jun 07, 2007 09:54 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Why should non-hindus be allowed to temples at all? How many hindus are allowed to relegious places of other communities?

Why do you want another Akshardham, another Sankat Mochan Temple incident?

Are hindus easy targets for the so-called protectors of other relegions rights? Shame on the secularists of India.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why should you bring a law ?
by Shyam S. on Jun 07, 2007 10:09 AM  Permalink
right said

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why should you bring a law ?
by Anuj Chandra on Jun 07, 2007 09:59 AM  Permalink
just because some1 else is being closed minded, that doesnt give u a right to be closed minded and blame others for being so...people murder other people, will u murder and then hide behind the fact that others are doing the same?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why should you bring a law ?
by Hemant on Jun 07, 2007 10:15 AM  Permalink
Mr. Anuj,
If someone want to screw your lady family members, would you let that. Be a open minded man !!!. Dude there is a limit for open minded. If anyone accepts Hinduism as their religion and Idol worshiping then only they should be allowed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why should you bring a law ?
by on Jun 07, 2007 10:22 AM  Permalink
This is not a matter of being closed minded or open ninded, its a matter of belelif. Why do Catholic and Muslims leaders not support birth control. That's because thier religion says so.

Why are Christian NUNS so eager to waste thier whole life preaching thier religion in poor countries like India, China and in Africa. Its not because they want to do good for poor people, its only because thier religion says so and they are trying to get thier own salvation.

They just consider themselves superior. They only understand the language of violence. When the Danish cartoons came out, Pope condemned the cartoons, but refused to say that all religions are equal. They don't consider all human beings are equal and hence are more closed minded.

Its people like you who consider themselves "educated" and "forward" who criticize thier own religion and ignore what others are doing. Half-knowledge is a very dagerous thing. Open your eyes and see what other religions are doing.

Its allowed to sell Cow's beef in India (80% Hindu), but even a country like Afganistan doesn't allow selling of liquor because its against Islam.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
because hinduism people are not slaves whereas muslim are slaves to arabs and christians are slave to their white masters
by raja on Jun 07, 2007 09:54 AM  Permalink 

because hinduism people are not slaves whereas muslim are slaves to arabs and christians are slave to their white masters



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 1467 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Write a message