RE:God save people facing trials in India
by Nageshwara Reddy on Aug 01, 2007 12:30 AM Permalink
you fool what if he killed one of your family member.have some sense.after a long time they are making some good judgements..
RE:God save people facing trials in India
by Sivaraman Srinivasan on Aug 01, 2007 01:08 AM Permalink
Just because corrupt politicians are going free does not mean that we have to let out Sanjay out. He committed crime. He deserves punishment for that.
If Sanjay is in Jail, it does not mean the film industry is going to suffer. Film industry in the world before his birth and will survivie for ages after his death.
Infact, he got special treatment. The judge gave him bail and allowed him to act in movies. He should be grateful to the judge for being considerate though Sanjay does not deserve that.
RE:God save people facing trials in India
by mahishasuramardini on Aug 01, 2007 01:05 AM Permalink
Doc r u a real doctor???? u are also doing the same thing ---seeking attention...
RE:God save people facing trials in India
by Makarand Vaidya on Aug 01, 2007 12:44 AM Permalink
Mr Yogi,
Sanjay Dutt deserved what he got.
Dawood's brother sent arms (guns, hand grenades) to Sanjay Dutt. Later he returned most and kept one AK56. Those guns and grenades were used in bomb blast by those terrorists.
Thats the charge against Sanjay Dutt and it has been proved. He is very lucky that he was not convicted in the conspiracy for the bombblast. He would have got lot more in that case.
Sanjay Dutt is no saint... He has been friends with D gang all along. Check this article http://www.rediff.com/news/2002/jul/29varsha.htm Particularly check the way he asked for some stuff from Chhota Shakeel. That shows how he is friends with the mafia.
RE:God save people facing trials in India
by Bhoopalan Srinivasan on Aug 01, 2007 01:05 AM Permalink
You are right to the extent that you feel the judiciary should be competant to absolve a person of repute or eminence for anything they could have committed as crime as per the law. But, to this element of overruling the law book needs to be framed in the law itself by way of specific procedure to be adopted to have the room for general amnesty/pardon based on public campaign and submission of supportive documents to a competant leagl authority who can recommend either for withdrawal of charges or to punish with mild sentence! Since such a built in procedure as above is not there in the law book (that too definitely not there for a TADA Special court appointed exclusively for the Mumbai bomb blasts of 1993),to peruse a convict's charges based on his social status and standing! Here, the Supreme Court steps in to restore the judgement to a better level in line with the public perceptions! Hope, dear SANJU gets some less jail term or let out as free man accepting his earlier 16 months in Jail is fair enough for him to learn the lessons for what he did!
Lodged in the same row as Dutt is notorious gangster Abu Salem [Images]. He was the man who delivered the AK-56 rifle at the actor's residence at the behest of underworld don Dawood Ibrahim's brother Anees Ebrahim.
In January 2007, a man called Abhimanyu Altekar filed an Intervener's Application, which opposed Sanjay Dutt's release in the 1993 bombings case.[8] Altekar had been acquitted by a sessions court, 16 years after he was arrested in a false case of planting a bomb outside the house of an Marathi daily editor in 1990. In his application, Altekar stated that one of the grounds of Dutt's application for seeking time to surrender was that he was the only earning member of the family. However, he was on bail for more than 12 years and had earned enough to make provisions for his family in case of a jail sentence. Altekar also argued that Dutt was mature enough at the time of buying illegal weapons, and did not deserve a reduced jail term. Though the intervener application filed by Altekar was rejected by the court, it raised doubt against of prosecution, the State Government of Maharashtra and the Indian Judiciary.
After all this Sanjay Dutt was sentenced to 6 years rigorous imprisonment on 31 July 2007
I think this is the right justice.. I am not against Him.. But Truth Privals Even if the person convicted is a Notable Person.
This case should serve as Role Model in making future decisions
RE:No Threat to society
by on Aug 01, 2007 12:55 AM Permalink
Life of 2000 dead could have been saved if he had informed police of conspiracy as responsible citizen. His enthusiasm as goon of Dawood Ebrahim prompted moral support to others 93 to do this heinous act. He is dangerous of all,to do it and get away and enjoy life, not even Dawood can do it. release all 93 if he is released. all have families to support,all have realised their mistakes, why have courts and make mockery .....
HE IS REFORMED, but this is punichment for the past crimes, WE ALL THOUGHT HE HAD BRIBED THE JUDGE AND THE JUDGE WOULD ACQUIT HIM AT THE END, BUT THE JUDGE STUNNED EVERYBODY, BUT THIS CAN BE CALLED THE "JUDGMENT DAY OF THE YEAR".
He must be booked under Arms Act and his verdict should be restricted to this offence but it is known that he is not invloved in the bomb blas he just committed a childish mistake of acquiring a gun for his safety but he never involved in the bomb blas then why shuld he be punished with relations with bomb bas
RE:sanjay dutt
by on Aug 01, 2007 01:01 AM Permalink
He asked for ammunation , he got it,its criminal act.If poor conspirators even lady imprisoned for life , should rich, bold,educated,well placed stalwarts get away? No , one asks for AK-57? Also who has friends who can supply AK? Only criminals have such friends.Being their associate, knowing of conspiracy, he knew Hindus will be killed and backlash of it and got AK 57 to kill more Hindus? He is no COW.
RE:sanjay dutt
by Mohammad Alam on Aug 01, 2007 12:35 AM Permalink
Yes and the 1000 or who died during the Bombay roits of 1993. what about them? did they not die a painful death? What about the justice to them?
RE:RE:sanjay dutt
by Sivaraman Srinivasan on Aug 01, 2007 01:13 AM Permalink
people who died in Bombay riots deserve justice Doesn't that mean that people can seek justice through Bomb blast.
RE:RE:sanjay dutt
by nikita bhatia on Aug 01, 2007 12:10 AM Permalink
Very true Deepak . Mr Deepak giving nice lecture is very easy . Go and ask the relatives of those who died in Mumbai Blast . Imagine their suffering, pitty & pain - you will get the answer.
RE:sanjay dutt
by nikita bhatia on Aug 01, 2007 12:07 AM Permalink
make a practice to accept the verdict of Appex court which is the only institution in Indian where anybody can trust . Moreover, have u have the complete materials when you give your judgement whether Sanjay should be proscuted under aram act or some other act .
A criminal is criminal irrespective of name , fame he or she command.
RE:sanjay dutt
by Sameer Thakur on Aug 01, 2007 12:53 AM Permalink
childish at the age of 34 ? still immature at that age ? then let all the people related to the bomb blasts go.some were even 16 years.and let this country have more film stars who try to relate with the gangsters !!! we have plenty as it is.
I think sanjay should accept that law is same for every one,he violated the law of the land by having arms illeagally and he is bound to be given the punishment.
But it is very piognant that in Indian jails there are no fans for inmates.This is in violation of human rights for 21st century.
I think sanjay should offer to work in the week days and stay in sunday and saturday in prison.He should offer to donate 90% of his earnings for 6 years,for the betterment of the families of those who died in the 93 blasts.
As he is no threat to the society , as he was probably never was this shold be considered by the home ministry of Maharastra, there by putting a presedent.
All those people who are sympathatic to those unfortunate people in the prisions shold donate money to jails to buy fans not only for people like sanjay but for all prisoners.
This shold be seriously considered because this year many prisioners in Thihar jail died of sunstroke.
RE:Sanjay should trade some thing for weekly probation.
by on Aug 01, 2007 01:10 AM Permalink
He had earned a lot but he donated no money to 257 victims of bomb blast, he well knew and as responsible citizen could have averted by informing police. He is criminal and live in India to make money. society has given him respect, love fame and money but he only gave them hate and death. We all know what criminals do on probation!!make more money and more conspiracies.
RE:Sanjay should trade some thing for weekly probation.
by Sanjay Lives on Aug 01, 2007 12:14 AM Permalink
the reason there are no fans in jail cells is because prisoners could hang themselves easily , or an inmate could kill another and hang him from the fan to make it look like suicide
In the eyes of law, everyone should get the same treament. No matters is it dutt or any other poor men. Offcourse it is the media who gives special concession to dutt by posting this article .was it bcoz he is an actor! if it happens to a common man, will rediff find time to have a glimpse?
RE:Biased media!
by HellBoy on Jul 31, 2007 11:47 PM Permalink
I totally agree, does a man who helped killing hundreds of people deserve - a fan , a aircondition, a private room with bath attached ?....
Do you even read the news before posting. Sanjay doesn't have anything to do with hundreds of people being killed. Are you sure you are following the right trial?
RE:Biased media!
by on Aug 01, 2007 01:47 AM Permalink
The verdict today to SD was for Bombay blasts not arms act.He knew his muslim friends had got arms and were on revengeful conspiracy and make it look like Gujrat riots in Bombay.There was no riotings and soon with identification a vehicle used for blast belonging to memon family and their disappearance let to arrests and opening of conspiracy. Sanjay Dutt got no time to use AK 56 to kill hindus but the arrest of his friends forced him to destroy this rifle. He may be actor but we are audience. Now he is acting again but its real drama, its real movie, lets see how he acts,how he eats, how his political friends get him out but judiciary gave verdict as it gives in movies. Bad characters and their political stooges will come out soon and the nation will watch real movie.But he will not get paid unless he sells his story or makes a movie of it
RE:Biased media!
by Divya on Aug 01, 2007 12:06 AM Permalink
you fool, just like ur name --HELL BOY... sanjay had no part in the killings.... he obtained gun to protect his family... stupid hellboy
