sanjay dutt today is not the same he was 14 yrs of age. at that time, may be he commit offense , he acted immature and behaved like spoilt man, but that was a different age. but in no way he is a terrorist and never did or had any intention to harm any countrymen and atrnish the image of india. but today he is a much changed and transformed person. he is such a gentleman and mature, a very good human being. his family is so good, sunil dutt saheb was a great human being himself. he and his family has given so much to society. by his acting he has entertained and brought cheers and smiles on millions of humans all over every friday. also he indulges in so much charity. so may be he did mistake. but his negative influnece is negligible in front of his grandness, greatness and positivity he is spreading today. he is not equal amongst equal but little more equal. THE PURPOSE OF PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE TO TRANSFORM A BAD HUMAN INTO A GOOD HUMAN, BUT AT THE MOMENT SANJAY DUTT IS ALREADY TRANSFROMED HUMAN, MUCH BETTER HUMAN BEING. The sentence is harsh and without any purpose. he cant be standed in front of others.he should have been punished within 5 yrs of that age. at the moment court has punished a wrong person, a person who dont exist, a great person and a nice human being has been punished who can give much more to the society. its high time judiciary think in a broader perspective.i just wish god grant sanjay and his family strength and courage to stand in this tough situation.
RE:judgement is too harsh and dont solve any purpose
by sabastin shiril on Jul 31, 2007 08:55 PM Permalink
in front of law everybody is same, he is famous thats why you are dicussing what about numerous other person who did not get the services of best lawyer? i like him but he did commit a crime in the eyes of law. remember we the society created the rule and law, so just like everyone accept it. sabastin los angeles
RE:RE:judgement is too harsh and dont solve any purpose
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:57 PM Permalink
xcuse me gave some harmony in u... if ppl wuld hav knwn those ppl who dint get good lawyerz den they wuld hav discussed abba them too n on top of tat ur frm los angeles wtt do u even knw d whole case if no then jus keep quiet
RE:judgement is too harsh and dont solve any purpose
by anip kumar on Jul 31, 2007 09:38 PM Permalink
yaa nikki..seems u r a good person..thanx hope sanju gets justice by god..god bless him
I am shocked to learn that Sanjay Dutt has been sentenced to six years in prison. He had spent 16 months in the jail before the trial.The judge is supposed to incarcerate someone who is an immediate danger to the society. Dutt is a very popular figure in the Bollywood movie industry and comes from a family that has given so much to the nation. The Judge is supposed to use his judgement that includes all relevant factors and deliver JUSTICE in every case before him.
I urge the President of India to communte Sanjay Dutt's unusual and cruel punishment. Dutt has already suffered a lot and today all his fans and well wishers are also suffering.
RE:Sanjay Dutt
by freoz k on Jul 31, 2007 08:53 PM Permalink
sentence awarded shows justice is eqaul for all irespective of onces status in society barring indian criminal politicians
RE:Sanjay Dutt
by Sudharshan Agadi on Jul 31, 2007 08:56 PM Permalink
I am a fan of sanjay datt but keeping law in point, I respect the judgement given to him. This is a best example one can see that any person who admit crime can never ran away from the hands of law.
RE:Why not punish Dawood, Pawar, Modi and Thackeray???
by giridhara upadhyaya on Jul 31, 2007 08:44 PM Permalink
fatema u require urgent psyciatric counselling. otherwise u will land with total insanity in a mental asylum.
