if all culprit would have booked under common i pc , most of them would have released without evidence,, it is tada which helped agencies to put them all behind bar,,,, sanjay was mafia goon who always have great suppport of d company,,,it is very stupid to support to such criminal,,,, all film industies is support of d company and get money from them,, main financer is d company and bharat shah, what a great shame on democratic countries
RE:all criminal have place in india, they have place in heavon,,
by Bhanu on Aug 01, 2007 10:12 AM Permalink
now he can show his gandhigiri in jail :) Atleast, the judge did treat him like a citizen of this country. Justice done!
I liked Mike Tyson as a boxer. He was excellent. He had also donated to charitable causes. But all this cannot excuse him in the rape case. He was convicted. Same goes to SanjuBaba. Guns plus the conversation with Abu Salem. Why spare this almost-a-terrorist. Good actor(I agree), but a good human being. Nope !!
RE:Tyson and Dutt
by AmarAkbarAnthony on Aug 01, 2007 10:06 AM Permalink
Mr. Patel - you as*hole - your Modi is a big terrorist - killed several thousands of innocent Muslims - he set free by BJP govt. In parliament there are hundreds of politicians who did crime but escaped from Law and order, because they play the cheap games. SanjuBaba a decent guy - never killed or harmed any person, still behind the bars. This is completely a political game, where Sanju is trapped.
RE:Tyson and Dutt
by Bhanu on Aug 01, 2007 10:14 AM Permalink
So u mean to say that those who possess weapons illegally , meet underworld people, push others to do crimes, attend parties with thugs and goons are noble people??
This is sheer injustice. How can a recent law abiding citizen and role model of several hundred thousands be sentenced to such severe verdict. He has proved himself to be a decent, honest and noble human being and above all a true hero after Munnabhai.
RE:Sanju baba
by sunilkumar mishra on Aug 01, 2007 10:36 AM Permalink
This is horrendously weak instance of justice as the judge was under tremendous pressure for delivering an exempalry punishment on Sanjay to appease a particular section of the convicts who had been crying foul on the discrimination shown against them while announcing the verdict. When the judge himslef has clearly said in his judgement that the crimes committed by Dutt and his friends Adajania and Nulwalla were not "anti-social, ghastly, inhuman, immoral or pre-planned" and did not cause any harm to the general public and when these delinquents have been taken off from the TADA jurisdiction, there was no reason why Sanjay and his friends would be meted out such harsh punishment particularly when u know that they have conducted themselves so well in the last 14 years of your so called trials. 14 years is too long a time for any crime to stand trial of our system of justice. When your life imprisonment is only that much, this shows that your judgment against people like Sanjay, who have really suffered enough for the crime they have committed in the last 14 years of trial and so donot deserve the degree of punishment they have been handed out now. There was a clear case of treating the case under probation of offenders act. U have erred in your late justice and does not do great justice to our system of judiciary. sunil
RE:Sanju baba
by Shital Patel on Aug 01, 2007 10:15 AM Permalink
I agree that he committed a mistake. I agree that he should have gotten jail time, he did, in 1993. He has served 16mos jail time. There was no need to send him to jail again, and definitely not for 6 years.
As for getting a gun license in India, takes a LONG time.
RE:Sanju baba
by Bhanu on Aug 01, 2007 10:30 AM Permalink
So lets start keeping weapons illegally if license takes a long time..and how bout hand grenades...He has weapons of mass distruction..is US listening??
I understand that people are debating whether this is good or bad judgment. Before we go into discussing further, I guess it is important for us to understand what is the rule of law in this case.
Can any one, who has some legal knowledge of Indian penal code, say what does the law say in this case? What does the law say of keeping a firearm? What is the sentence specified in the law? Please throw some light. Thanks.
Indians strangely are sympathetic even towards criminals who are said to be reformed, we have a tendency to forgive(that's good), one and all feel very sorry for sanjay, but, if sanjay is let off it would only give way to more criminal activities, propobably that's the only reason we assume that this punishment becomes necessary. Forgiving is very good human tendency, but should we forgive CHINA.. A firm No. I am sure the Indian Army has not, but the government is scared to take on and hence pretends to have forgiven.
