today i see some messages sympathising with sanjay dutt had this sentence been given to him in 1993 would they sympathise like this. So many people were killed in the blasts.He commited a crime but because of the indian law which takes so many years people tend to forget what had happened at that time. so please he has commited crime and he shuld be punished no second thoughts. He didnt make a mistake he knew very well what he was doing. if he was framed or anything the matter would be different.but not in this case
RE:sanjay
by Bharat Express on Jul 31, 2007 03:04 PM Permalink
our legal system is designed in manner allowing a Human being to undergo transformation not punishment only if the individual i a burden on society this does not apply now what good is it to put a transformed man to Jail and what good will it do to society other than the fact that yes some high society rogues will be careful for few days This man Sanjay has Played a role to help shaping our society through his movies and this man could have been kept on observation rather than directly send him to jail like a common criminal IF PEOPLE LIKE PHOLAN DEVI COULD BECOME MP AND even a terrorist like Yasin Malik could be given chance why not to this guy by the way iam not a fan of this actor or any other nor iam i sympathzing with him only commenting from the angle of Humanity.
Well everyone is expressing that he kept AK56 but on a wider scale he was very much part of the conspiracy. His father Sunil Dutt showed himself as a compatriot but was oblivious of the activities of his son and went all and sundry to protect him in first place.
But the renegade film industry will rally behind him as if he is innocent. These scoudrels deserve that.
In India, if you are somehow linked to the media and underground (I mean both are same in my opinion)with political lineage, you can get away from anything.
While the associates of Sanjay Dutt who merely executed his orders received life-terms, this guy who facilitated the entire Mumbai massacre with his total knowledge getting patronage frm Judges with linient verdicts.
Media is trying its best to portray the verdict as tough so that they get their pay cheque from Sanjay!
If he were a non celebrity then he would have been tried and sentenced under POTA and not under the Arms Act. He should thank his stars and not challenge the decision in Supreme Court. Respect the Judgement Munnabhai.
RE:Hidden and Visible Terrorists
by piyush praharaj on Jul 31, 2007 03:04 PM Permalink
yes i agree with now a days politics is the strongest terror to the country and all those dawod,abu etc etc were created by the power of politics.
RE:Hidden and Visible Terrorists
by Sameer Pandey on Jul 31, 2007 03:00 PM Permalink
dear Sir,
Are u forgetting Sonia Gandhi
She's aterror for her partymen who follow all her words and never question the same. ( surrender all their powers by giving all decision making to her)
Confused why i say this.
Well you started it . we were discussing sanjay you brought in others.
Keep yourself focussed on the person and his crime. ( only for now)
RE:Hidden and Visible Terrorists
by Pat Thakur on Jul 31, 2007 03:05 PM Permalink
No, they will never write about Sonia. She is their godmother; you know, don't you? If they start anything against her, they know their balls will be cut off by the Italian Mafioso...
