Who is this najama and wha tis her contribution to INDIA? is really india needs the presidents and wise presidents? ..and waste money on maintaiing them???
RE:who is this najama?
by shiney joji on Jul 29, 2007 10:52 AM Permalink
We are not expecting much from the President of India.Here the dirty politicians need a Rubber Stamp. We got a best Rubber stamp as president.Abdul Kalam can't be controlled by remote controller.That's they didn't give a seceond chance.CPM and left parties said the President should have some political background.ie Whether the person is corrupted or not is secondary.
Can a person who betrayed the party which gave her everything be trusted??? Can an opportunist who left the congress just because she was so sure that congress would lose the 2004 general elections in the face of BJPs high profile India Shining Campaign be trusted???
Najam may be competent. . .Yes, honest. . . Maybe. . .But Integrity . . . I have my doubts.
P.S. Eagerly waiting for BJP wolves to pounce on me with their vitriolic and abusive comments.
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by s deshpande on Jul 29, 2007 06:11 AM Permalink
You call retention of faith with the Congress as 'integrity'? On the contrary, she preferred to leave the party instead of stying as a chamcha of the congress president shows that her integrity is beyond doubt! And that is why she would not get a chance to win too.
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 06:26 AM Permalink
Najma Heptullah moved to BJP after she failed to get congress party's nomination for Vice President in 2002. Much like people switching jobs when they don't get a promotion.
She didn't leave because she didn't want to be a chamcha, she left because she was opportunistic.
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Sahadevan KK on Jul 31, 2007 05:18 PM Permalink
Najma is ready for a defeat; BJP prepares for a series of defeats.
RE:RE:RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Sahadevan KK on Jul 31, 2007 05:18 PM Permalink
Najma is ready for a defeat; BJP prepares for a series of defeats.
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 02:01 AM Permalink
perhaps your screw is loose .. you couldn't come up with anything but a personal attack.
BJP's game is exposed .... they claim to be a hindu party of upper caste but woo muslims.
if you want to bury your head in sand, its your outlook .... like i care if you get run over
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Sreekanth Nemani on Jul 29, 2007 03:49 AM Permalink
I guess the blind sheep like behavior of the congress people is called Loyalty? It is the same kind of thing hitler's followers had for hitler! Using your mind, and choosing to distance oneself from evil is not lack of integrity.
Unfortunately, you people are so lost in your hatred for BJP, this hate is harming the country far more than any stupid nonsense that VHP etc do! You are giving corrupt, tainted b**tards lot of power to destroy everything we have managed to achieve, and they are doing it, to the extent that they kicked out the most honest and respectable president we have ever had! Don't tell me you have some problem with the integrity of Kalam too??
By the time you guys will realize what you have done, it will probably be too late!!
RE:RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by satya pal on Jul 29, 2007 03:08 PM Permalink
what type of congress party is?.living person is v.p.singh.morarji desai,chandershekher,chaudhry charan singh all belonged to congress.now natwar singh is recent ex-congress person.if you are not yes sir type,you can not live in the organisation.it is called indiscipline.only one man's say shall prevail.another type of dictatorship.healthy criticism must be appreciated.god bless these politicians.congress has given to india bribe culture.others have followed.now congress shall correct this.they can do it,if they want.let us see transport improvement in delhi,water supply,sewerage,education and health.i am sure congress govt. can do it.man learns from mistakes.congress shall also learn from the past.good luck to congress.
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 05:53 AM Permalink
I could say the same thing about you congress haters. Your hatred for Sonia Gandhi is harming the country. BJP has nothing on her except for her foreign origin. There are no charges of corruption against her and she has complete loyalty and commitment to India and India's interests. So what if she worked as a waitress. Why is waiting tables looked down upon by BJP supporters. When will you understand dignity of labor.
BJP on the other hand plays petty politics ... like they supported the VP Singh govt. despite its decision to implement Mandal commission report - they withdrew their support only when Advanis' rath yatra was stopped. I can't tell you enough about Gujarat riots and how BJP's inaction both in center and state cost lives. Now BJP leader goes to Pakistan and begs for muslim support there. There is so much dissidence within BJP that some of their MLAs didn't vote for Shekhawat.
No one has ever said anything about Kalam's integrity. He is a great man and I am sure that he is better off as a professor and a scientist than he would have been in rashtrapati bhawan.
... and then you say that congress supporters are wrong ... what's speaking for you if it is not your hate for congress or your blind obsession with BJP that whatever wrong they do, it remains unnoticed by you guys?
why are you guys being unfair to the country you live in?
By the time you guys will realize what you have done, it will probably be too late!!
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Sreekanth Nemani on Jul 31, 2007 07:28 AM Permalink
My dear Loan Shark,
Let me contest each of your points logically. First of all for every V.P. Singh government, there are 10 Chandrsekhar/Deve Gowda/ I.K.Gujral / Charan Singh govenments that the congress supported and then withdrew to hang on to power! Infact chanran singh is the only PM who never entered the Parliament Session as P.M, that is how long his govt. lasted!! BJP's support withdrawal to V.P.Singh was very minor comparitively. So, if you hate BJP for this reason, then you should hate congress five times more!
Secondly, I did not mention anything about hating Sonia for being a waitress. I could say the same thing abt hating Advani for his statements in Pak though. Those statements sounded more truly from heart in opinion, than Sonia's apparent "not interested" in bein PM statement. How stupid can you be to believe that she is not interested in being PM??!! Infact she did not support Kalam because he didn't agree to go with her wishes then!
If you agree about Kalam's integrity, then why did the congress kick him out?? Don't tell me it is because they thought he would be more useful as a professor!! They kicked him out because they wanted a crony in the Rashtrapati Bhavan. When BJP was in power, they did not try to have a crony, that in itself speaks volumes about fair governance of the NDA govt!
You are talking about Gujrat Riots because they happened in a BJP ruled state. Why don't you talk about the Coimbatore Riots, or the Singur massacre, or the innumerable
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by jay mohan on Jul 29, 2007 11:28 AM Permalink
SOME INDIAN PEOPLE ARE STILL ARE READY TO EAT AND WIPE ANY FOREIGNER'S FEET FOR THE SAKE OF WESTERN LIFE AND FASHION! FOREIGN GODS, MUSIC,LANGUAGE, ART AND ANYTHING WHICH FOREIGNERS OFFER! THEY DONT UNDERSTAND THAT THEIR CULTURE HAS SO MUCH TO OFFER! THEY CHANGE RELIGION FOR MONEY, NAMES FOR STYLE, EVENTUALLY THEY DONT HAVE THEIR IDENTITY, WELL THEY LIKE LICKING WESTERNER'S FEET AND ELSEWHERE! LOAN SHARK IS ONE SUCH GUY WHO LICKS!
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Prabasi Sur on Jul 30, 2007 10:32 AM Permalink
The political facts against u is termed by u as abusive. The political fact is that i) congress is a party established by a British, Alan Octavian Hume. ii) Congress is a party which always saved British from the wrath of the real revolutionaries. Even Netaji Subhash Chandra had to be stepped down from Congress Presidency by Gandhi only to appease British. iii) Congress was a party in the division of our country. Gandhi had assured to resist it with his comment "It would happen only over my body". Its mockery of his status that he enjoyed partition and supported partition-criminal pakistan's bid for money from India. iv) Therefore it is quite obvious that since its formation Congress Party have systematically eliminated nationalists and taken all the antinational decisions for the petty interest of their leaders. v) therefore at this moment, any congress-supporter are prone to be under suspicion of party to all the antinational activities. vi) Therefore u cannot blame anybody of uttering the same nevertheless it appears to be abusive to u.
RE:Loyalty also a desired quality
by Sab Harim on Jul 29, 2007 06:16 AM Permalink
If she had stuck with the Congress in those hard times (2004)and not fallen for the shining India campaign,she would have been 'Madam President' today instead of Smt.Patil.Though she may not have been chosen for her-whatever-virtues, she would surely have been a 'convenient' candidate for the Congress.
RE:Haa Hee Hoo
by bluebie on Jul 29, 2007 04:54 AM Permalink
it is not ever possible ti write Gandhi's name along with all the rest of the names mentioned here...at least remember he is the Father of the Nation...at least remember tht his policies got us freedom....at least remember the manner in which he lived, without any luxuries and fanfare....whtever ur reasons are to brand others, have u ever thought of urself?
RE:Haa Hee Hoo
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 05:57 AM Permalink
Gandhiji was a victim of RSS hate. So much that this man gave to us, his contribution to India's struggle and his message of non-violence and truthfulness.
I wonder why his killers could not ever see the saint in Gandhiji.
RE:Haa Hee Hoo
by uniquemachoman on Jul 29, 2007 07:34 AM Permalink
Gandhi was not a victim of RSS hate, but post independant India is the victim of some of Gandhi's blunders. Also for your information, when Nehru govt banned RSS, RSS fought it through nation's legal path, and by using any path of terrorism. And RSS was not found guilty. So you better know your history.
RE:RE:Haa Hee Hoo
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 08:06 AM Permalink
Independent India and its people owe their independence to people like Gandhi. Yes, RSS was banned in 1948 for its perceived threat to nation ... afterall RSS orchestarted Gandhiji's murder and then disowned Godse. The ban was lifted by Supreme Court due to lack of evidence, although I wish RSS had been wiped off India in 1948 itself.
RE:Haa Hee Hoo
by prabhanjan tattar on Jul 29, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
Mahatma Gandhi was killed by Ghodse is a truth. But what many people fail to see is that the Gandhian school was deserted by the Congress itself, and that it was let down by Congress and not RSS.
Najma is certainly a good candidate. Let us not have anything about her switching sides etc. That does not make her less competent. At least there are no accusations of shielding murderers, misappropriation of funds etc. against her. What is more, she has the necessary experience. Strangely the Leftitsts were vehemently arguing for experience in the Presidential election [ probably personal integrity does not count in their view ] and now they say VP can be a non-political person so that they can impose their own candidate. But then, opportunism was nothing new to the Left, they have been doing so throughout their career.
RE:VP Election
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 12:17 AM Permalink
Najma may be a good candidate, but Ansari is certainly better. Besides, in democracy it is the votes that count.
Even in presidential elections, some BJP MLAs, heeding their party's call for conscious vote, voted for Patil instead of Shekhawat.
RE:VP Election
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 01:38 AM Permalink
why should I go to pakistan? does India belong to BJP supporting Hindus only? can't congress supporting Hindus live in India and call it their motherland? Do I have to have to be a narrow minded RSS person to call myself an Indian.
you Jinnah supporters in BJP should migrate to pakistan and kiss their behind in public.
RE:thank god for najma
by Loan Shark on Jul 28, 2007 10:35 PM Permalink
Obviously, you didn't read the article. Heptullah won't be India's VP anytime soon. She doesn't have the necessary votes.
Ms. Heptulla's story is very sad one; she is neither Ghar-ke nor Ghat ki.
Fake Hindutwavadi's have wiped-out her and her Grand-father's sweat of Indepedence movement commitment, through saffron colour tissue paper once for all.
BJP will leave her high and dry.
By agreeing to contest as NDA candidate, she has not only forfieted all that reputation earned under the Congress Leadership; but put her own credibility in muck.
It is really sad she has such perverted advisor asking her to contest the already lost election to the post of VP.
RE:NAZMA HEPTULLA - NEW HIPOCRATE UNDER BJP's SAFFRON UMBRELLA.
by rajesh rajesh on Jul 28, 2007 11:02 PM Permalink
I agree with sudhakar....she is nice person at wrong side. Her historic blunder would be joining hands with BJP 2 yrs back. She would have been idle President than VP.
I think, now our respectived President mite be talking to ghosts. God save India!!!
RE:NAZMA HEPTULLA - NEW HIPOCRATE UNDER BJP's SAFFRON UMBRELLA.
by sree reddy on Jul 28, 2007 11:30 PM Permalink
hey where are u...being an literate you r supporting congress..u dont hav brain..india became like this because of you people like absent minded fellows.. try to act smart..
RE:NAZMA HEPTULLA - NEW HIPOCRATE UNDER BJP's SAFFRON UMBRELLA.
by Ringo Star on Jul 29, 2007 08:32 AM Permalink
only brainless illiterates support BJp. They have a one track mind!fortunatly God has saved India from them.
RE:NAZMA HEPTULLA - NEW HIPOCRATE UNDER BJP's SAFFRON UMBRELLA.
by Loan Shark on Jul 29, 2007 12:13 AM Permalink
Literates support congress ... illieterates have been brainwashed by RSS
RE:NAZMA HEPTULLA - NEW HIPOCRATE UNDER BJP's SAFFRON UMBRELLA.
by Anil C on Jul 29, 2007 02:02 PM Permalink
unfortunately, reputation earned by being an able leader is not lost. You compare it to a student failing in the exam. dear friend it is not so. No matter what the outcome of the election is, or who she is representing, Ultimately it falls on the persons personality. atleast from what i know she is clean. regarding loyalty, i believe it should be to the people whoom you are representing not to the leader who is surrounded by boot lickers. by the way you are talking about loyalty. In the elections, congress and left against each other, they didnt have a common manifesto but their own, based on which they fought the elections. the votes they got was a representative of what people liked in them. immediately after the elections, they join hands as buddies and declare a common manifesto and collude in forming the government. is there any loyalty to the people. shielding the accused in bofors case, hiding truth from the people, for over 3 weeks, but the truth came out thanks to the leak. yet they didnt take any action to get the accused to india. mismanaged everything,, staged the show as patriots, thanks to the gandhi nametag at the end.-- should be a sure script for a perfect bollywood film.... certainly congress people and its supports should not cry loyalty from the roof top.
Just give it a thought too buddy. talking about nazma, she didnt break any rule, contesting as an NDA candidate.
RE:NAZMA HEPTULLA - NEW HIPOCRATE UNDER BJP's SAFFRON UMBRELLA.
by sudhakar sk on Jul 29, 2007 07:56 PM Permalink
Kindly read what you wrote on this public dominian; u have made all kind of contradictory statements without a logic.
This is what BJP Leadership teaches to its discredicted cadre.
Look at Rajnath Singh, Arun Jaitely or even Sushma Swaraj-they put thier both legs into thier mouth and become matter of laughter and joke.
To give one example of ur statement "surrounded by bootlickers"; this may be your profession, but I knew personally Dr. Najma Heptulla, she never did it in her two decade of stinct, under Congress Leadership; niether any others do it there for sure; it is only perverted, master-minded, sick campaign of BJP and SanghParivar.
That is how they cheat and loot uneducated, poor and innocent Hindus in the name of Hindutwa.
What is unfortunate is that their master's didn't tell them meaning of secularism - so our SICKularists are as their name. They are angry... a muslim cheating Madame Gandhi. This is indulgence.
Admire the masters who have created a million sickularist... all think that a sickularist is opposite of something called taliban, where as hindu is less civilized than that the ones touched in the back by maculay's programme.
RE:SICKularists are indulgent
by Loan Shark on Jul 28, 2007 09:32 PM Permalink
Too bad that you lecture secularists without knowing how to spell the word.
RE:SICKularists are indulgent
by biz Narayan on Jul 28, 2007 09:36 PM Permalink
Laugh more and well , you will get over from one of the finest seckular weapons - spelling of english words.
RE:SICKularists are indulgent
by biz Narayan on Jul 28, 2007 09:33 PM Permalink
Loan Shark is a sickularist... read his comment below... he is amazed by a person who didn't support Vande Mataram, and support him as president.
SICKularism should be back to its glory, Dawood should be the VP.
RE:RE:SICKularists are indulgent
by Loan Shark on Jul 28, 2007 09:57 PM Permalink
only someone like you would support Dawood for VP ... so typical of your defeatist medntality and feeling of inferiority that you are willing to support a national enemy for Vice Presidency.
from Sylhet, Bangladesh Actually, what India needs now is the introduction of three Vice-Presidents under one President. These Vice-Presidents would be 1. Vice-President (Executive or Administrative) Vice-President (Legislative) and Vice-President (Judiciary). Only then, Muslims, Harijans, Brahmans, Women and other vital vote banks can be satisfied. It is difficult to please many with minimum post(s). What the Congress wants now is a MALE MUSLIM for the VP post. Indian politicians have given widespread scopes to undergo political study and research on political thought round the globe.
