Excellent and perceptive analysis from Rajeev. The House of Saud has "James Baker", "Madeline Albright" not to mention host of Ivy league campuses in their pocket via "consulting contracts", or endowments.
Plus he is actually a favourite canidate of many Islamists, and pretty tight with the Pakis. His anti-Indian activity basically shows the influence these Pan-Islamists weave as most Americans would not offende any group during an campaign.
This proves the Saudi Manchurian candiate given this activity, and their amibitions.
You yourself are being RACIST when you describe the U.S. presidential election being won by an 'exotic' woman or black as compared to a "good-old boy white man". Just because you are a white man does not automatically make you good. Looking after the interests of your own country does not make that a Macaca moment. Sending American jobs to India is something Hillary is supporting. That is not good for American citizens. Hillary is the one with the macaca moment when she makes fun of Ghandi(the video is on youtube). View for yourself.
RE:Your viewpoint
by Varun Shekhar on Jul 20, 2007 10:31 PM Permalink
"on", then why is India alone being singled out, though only a few jobs have gone there? What about China, which has taken millions of American jobs? What about the anomoly of Saudi Arabia never being criticised, despite being one of the most repressive countries in the world? Rajeev's major argument is that people take India for granted because India is seen as weak or of no consequence. China, Israel and Saudi Arabia are not.
RE:Your viewpoint
by Julia Kingsley on Jul 26, 2007 12:15 AM Permalink
Apparently you are not familiar with the phrase "good ole boy" which is an Americanism that indicates what they call a Southern redneck, ie. a white man from the Southern states who may be racist or intolerant and often not well educated.
