RE:Indian wife of the Jordanian Doctor
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:13 PM Permalink
"Umma" dude its "Umma" -- For them a Muslim terrorist from Pak is close to heart than their neighbor next door!
RE:Indian wife of the Jordanian Doctor
by Vinu Bhardwaj on Jul 03, 2007 08:17 PM Permalink
You are right, Dude. I guess the husband and wife must be communicating in English on how to blow up as many innocent civilians as possible.
RE:Indian wife of the Jordanian Doctor
by kaka on Jul 03, 2007 08:48 PM Permalink
I dont think there is anything wrong in falling in love. but falling in love without knowing his motives is a big mistake.
RE:Indian wife of the Jordanian Doctor
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:29 PM Permalink
There is an exception for everything ... When they are in minority they speak others language but the moment they become majority, all that they do is killing!
Islam may not teach violence .. but for Muslims its a way of life, I mean the violence.
These group of Doctors could not explode a car bomb despite their qualifications. Any Haroon, Mahroon or Mohamed from Pakistan can do a better job than these bunch of Doctors. I will never go to these Doctors for any of my health problems
RE:RE:Incompetent Doctors
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:15 PM Permalink
How many of us Respect those saints Indian Hindu. Its our fault that we dont respect our values and we are not united. There is no point in blaming hte predator when you cant keep you house in order!
RE:RE:Incompetent Doctors
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:14 PM Permalink
I know it dude - but well they are the Doctors ... and their doctrine is terrorism ... may be a University in Pakistan can award them the degree "Doctor of Terrorism"
RE:to shameer khan
by Vinu Bhardwaj on Jul 03, 2007 07:56 PM Permalink
Indian Hindu, You are right. Muslims are killing each other in Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and others all over the world, but the only thing that Muslims were angry over and staged violent marches was because the Britishers had knighted Rushdie.
RE:RE:to shameer khan
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:05 PM Permalink
Are you kidding? If Hindus are really united, nobody can harm them, but thats the whole problem - Hindus are not a single entity yet, even though things are changing and they are realizing the threats from the Sugar Coated Knives belonging to the religion of peace.
Thanks to Gujarat riots, Muslims too realized that Hindus can react - and that sit everybody started talking about Secularism .. before Gujarat no bloody Muslim guy talked about Secularism .. all they wanted was Islam!
While observing the peaceful and positive image of Islam, viewers listened to the broadcast voice speak about terrorism.
The media has played a crucial role in creating the gross misconceptions that Muslims behave the way they do because of Islam. Since early 2002, the public has heard not every Muslim is a terrorist, but every terrorist is a Muslim with increasing frequency
A very small, radical, hate-filled, extremist, terrorist wing does exist. So too does a much larger peaceful, moderate wing. Unfortunately, the former seem to capture all the media's attention, while the latter is rarely heard .
May God guide all this misinforming medias to see the good, to search for truth and proclaim the truth without any prejudice or earthly ambitions, in a spirit of love, tolerance and brotherhood. Atleast in coming times ,may persons of all faiths, especially our children, interact informally as friends and neighbors with mutual regard, appreciation and respect. Lets hope and pray that this will be our shared future.
All praise and thanks be to God, Lord of all the universe.
RE:medias role....?2
by kaka on Jul 03, 2007 07:36 PM Permalink
I guess what we as general public needs to see is that there has to be preemptive action by the members of the community itself. In this case the closest associative people may have seen vast differences in their behaviour. A little of vigilance could have identified it and then they should have reported to the authorities. Only then will the trust be earned...
RE:medias role....?2
by Hema on Jul 03, 2007 07:43 PM Permalink
Shameer,
Leaving peacefully and treating every life respectfully is what is expected normally. Hence, it does not need emphasis. But, taking innocent lives for no reason, but out of hatred is abnormal, and against all human norms. Hence, they need to be given emphasis. Are being given emphasis. It is only with such an emphasis, to some extent, such acts can be prevented. Do not the blame the media for giving such emphasis. But blame those few muslim men who have taking the entire religion for a ride, and forcing the media to emphasize.
RE:medias role....?2
by shameer khan on Jul 03, 2007 08:09 PM Permalink
The interests of sensationalism has often taken over many of the news media gives .Media is repeatedly making a fundamental error in reporting the political wars as a clash of religions, owing to its reporters lacking an adequate understanding of the situation. The media should look at the removal of ignorance about religion. We need to know and understand what essential beliefs are and how they contribute to society. The media should do a lot more of that. It is so easy in an atmosphere of ignorance for prejudice to arise. The media should present religion in a way that people can identify the way they live and believe.
RE:medias role....?2
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:16 PM Permalink
Look, When Hindus felt Modi did something wrong most of them Criticized it .. TELL ME HOW MANY MUSLIMS CRITICIZED GODHRA OR KASHMIR?
You guys support whatever the so called Minority radical wing does and still disown them and expect the other groups to keep quiet and watch .. is it?
RE:medias role....?2
by KETAN DESAI on Jul 03, 2007 08:14 PM Permalink
Shammer, Tell me one thing, How about Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Palestine and other Muslim countries supporting Islamic terrorism? And how about Muslim sitting in a room, doing nothing but giving reasons for Terrorism throughout world and policies of Western countries?
RE:medias role....?2
by Only Dude on Jul 03, 2007 08:17 PM Permalink
The moment you ask these questions, the guy goes silent ...this is what those guys are all about!
On Sept. 11 ,2001, the world watched in dismay as the Twin Towers crumbled down. Soon, news broadcasters charged Islamic fundamentalists as being responsible for the terrorist attacks in New York City. This destructive image of Islam quickly swept across the world. Many questioned, how does Islam promote such an attack? The truth is, it doesn't. Islam is a religion of peace and does not condone the killing of innocent people.
In fact, "Islam" is understood to mean "submission to the will of God," and is derived from a root word that means "peace." The term "Islamic fundamentalist" is often misused. To maintain the fundamental beliefs of Islam is quite the opposite of terrorism.
One of the most misinterpreted words in the western world is jihad, an Arabic word that means struggle. The word comes from the root word jahada, which means to strive for a better way of life. Other meanings are endeavor, strain, exertion, effort, diligence, fighting to defend one's life, land and religion. The prophet Muhammad(peace be upon him) said in a tradition that the best jihad for one to perform is jihad against his own self and against his own desires. Muslims are peaceful.. and if you respect them they will respect you...Islam and muslims are like any other religion in the world Some of the media outlets do not portray Islam honestly. On a spring morning in May 2007, an image of Muslims prostrating in prayerful submission appeared on CNN. While observing the peaceful and positive
RE:medias role.......????
by Hema on Jul 03, 2007 07:59 PM Permalink
Shameer,
No body said anything against Islam. But only against those terrorist activities and terrorists, who happened to belong to Islam. 100% of muslims are not terrorists, but 100% of terrorists happened to be muslims. So, what is the inference?
You said "muslims are peaceful... and if you respect them they will respect you...". What disrespect the victims of twin towers showed towards Islam, what disrespect the victims of train passengers in Bombay and in London showed towards Islam.
If someone has misused the Islam religion, that is the very same people, who have taking the innocent lives under the banner of Islam fundamentalism. Such perpetrators are only muslim by name, but not by their religious practices.
Do not blame the media. Try not to force the media to cover such heinous crimes by a handful of coward people who have nothing but hatred.
There are Indians. And then muslims in India. BBC has reported that the second Indian doctor arrested is also a muslim named Marwah Dana Asha, 27 (wife of Dr Mohammed Asha). They have not been using their religion properly; and abusing their Indian nationality. Abusing nationality should be perceived as a crime against the entire nation. And should be dealt accordingly.
RE:These Indian muslims abused their nationality
by Vinu Bhardwaj on Jul 03, 2007 08:00 PM Permalink
Why did this Indian chick marry a fanatic from Jordan? Were all good Indian men taken or were they asking for too much dowry?
RE:These Indian muslims abused their nationality
by syed ishaq on Jul 03, 2007 07:37 PM Permalink
You are crazy Don't come to conclusion did you read it properly. this sentence "No charges have been filed yet," they were arrested coz they buy one way ticket.
RE:These Indian muslims abused their nationality
by KETAN DESAI on Jul 03, 2007 08:14 PM Permalink
Syed, You don't know what you are talking. How about Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Palestine and other Muslim countries supporting Islamic terrorism? And how about Muslim sitting in a room, doing nothing but giving reasons for Terrorism throughout world and policies of Western countries?
RE:These Indian muslims abused their nationality
by Hema on Jul 03, 2007 08:16 PM Permalink
Syed,
There are two Indian muslims, who were arrested. One in Australia, and the other in the UK. I wrote about the latter, whereas you are talking about the former.
Even talking about the former, the facts are: He was not arrested, because he bought one way ticket. He was arrested because the suspects arrested in the UK made calls to this man, who happened to buy one way ticket. Agree with you that no proof has yet been established against him! If Indian muslims are proclaimed not-guilty, I will be one of the millions, who will be happy.
RE:indian doctor held for terrorism
by kaka on Jul 03, 2007 07:23 PM Permalink
For the 11th time check your posts before posting somthing stupid. that was in Australia.
RE:indian doctor held for terrorism
by Hema on Jul 03, 2007 07:30 PM Permalink
Kaka,
Please do not be quick on tongue. Nandagopal was probably referring to the second Indian doctor, who was arrested in the UK, alongwith her husband. Her name is Marwah Dana Asha (husband of Dr Mohammed Asha). Another so called educated muslim, who has gravely abused the Indian nationality!
RE:indian doctor held for terrorism
by KETAN DESAI on Jul 03, 2007 08:40 PM Permalink
How does it make difference with different name. Majority of Muslims have same 'Terrorist' mind set. Those who don't contribut to Terrorism, do it indirectly by sitting in a room, doing nothing but giving reasons for Terrorism throughout world and policies of Western countries?
RE:RE:indian doctor held for terrorism
by Jamshed Petladwala on Jul 03, 2007 07:38 PM Permalink
Dont bother about the place, the substance is that he/she are misusing the INDIAN nationality for terrorits act. Even if you sacrifice 1000 gandhi, there will be not appreciation, unless someone is a muslim.What a culture,what a mentality.
RE:where are the muslims???
by sanju baba on Jul 03, 2007 07:19 PM Permalink
If u read through carefully , they are picked up because they booked the ONE WAY flight .. I donno it what sense it makes them feel that these Indians are involved.
RE:where are the muslims???
by kaka on Jul 03, 2007 07:26 PM Permalink
again check facts before venting... it seems like there were phone calls made from those UK docs to him. Who knows what the story is? May be this guy is purely innocent and felt comfortable moving with his fellow muslims. Sydney Morning Herald claims he is very quiet. So who knows... only time will tell. If he is innocent then it is a lesson for all indian muslims living outside India.
I am watching CNN and they are showing live pics from Islamabad where some burqa clad women are holed up in a Mosque threatening to go on suicide missions.... What a great religion!!
RE:Bloodshed in Pakistan
by Ram Chauthariya on Jul 03, 2007 07:13 PM Permalink
It is already here in India (Kashmir). Do you not consider Kashmir a part of India?
