Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 27 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2
Pak president is pretending
by chaitanya bhanage on Jan 28, 2007 05:38 PM  Permalink 

Pak president is pretending as is showing to the world,that's it.Pak is afraid if US stops the military aid.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
BUSH THE BIGGEST TERRORIST OF TODAYS WORLD
by aleem Baig on Jan 28, 2007 05:34 PM  Permalink 

For what he is selling fighters, military aid to pak and another one to india, to devlop humanity? big B he is.. He doesnt want peace in the world. if Peace is everywere than where he will sell him death machines, and how his economy will grow..Jago --indian and pakistani and chini..pl Jago, and spend for poor..and not for arms..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
What Mushy ruff meant
by NGS on Jan 28, 2007 05:30 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

MY COOMMITMENT TO SEND MORE AND MORE TERRORIST IN INDIA IS UNSHAKEABLE

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What Mushy ruff meant
by Senthil Kumar on Jan 28, 2007 06:42 PM  Permalink
I always say "My commitment to MIGHT terrorism is unshakable". But, these media people always take it wrongly. I hope they understand and print it correctly hereafter : Musharraf


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What Mushy ruff meant
by Satyanarayana Maddi on Jan 28, 2007 06:15 PM  Permalink
Excelletn, That's the reality.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Please start fast: and start from Head i.e.BUSH & CO.
by aleem Baig on Jan 28, 2007 05:27 PM  Permalink 

PLEASE DO IT, ALL HUMANS R WITH U EXCEPT CREATURES LIKE BUSH, BLAIR ETC. WHO R SELF LICENSED TERRORIST AND TO FIGHT THEM IS TO BE CALLED "FREEDON OF HUMANITY"..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Double Standards
by Sovan Mandal on Jan 28, 2007 05:18 PM  Permalink 

The General is a sly and shrewd politician. He knows he is under a cloud of suspicion for his links with terror modules, so he doing all this to save his skin. The irony of the whole thing is that, what is terrorism on his left side in Afganistan, his struggle for freedom in Kashmir. This inspite of that it is the innocent men, women, and children who is always at the receiving end.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
WHO IS MUSHRAAF?
by varghese on Jan 28, 2007 05:16 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

DO WE KNOW THAT THIS MAN IS NOT LEGALY THE HEAD OF PAKISTHAN...HE IS A MODERN DAY UNIFORMED GOONDA WHO HAS NO FOUNDATION ..WHO THEN IS MUSHRAAF? HE IS JUST ANOTHER CLOWN FROM THIS LAWLESS ISLAMIC LAND...WHAT HE TALKS IS CHAFF...NOT A SINGLE TREAT HE SIGNS HAS AN SIGNIFICANCE OTHER THAN INK WASTE AND PAPER WASTE AS NONE OF THE FUTURE LEADERS OF PAKISTHAN IS EVER GOING TO STAND B HIS STATEMENTS ..WE ARE DEALING WITH AN UN-CIVILIZED BARBARIC ISLAMIC COUNTR WHERE NOTHING WILL EVER WORK ..KUDOS TO OUR POLITICIANS FOR ENTERTAINING SUCH CLOWNS AT THE COST OF THE NATION

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:WHO IS MUSHRAAF?
by aleem Baig on Jan 28, 2007 05:29 PM  Permalink
what is islamic land, and what is other land..clear u r target first.. Terrorisam is the thing by which innocent humans are terrorised and that job is being done very well by bush and com..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:WHO IS MUSHRAAF?
by Amin Amin on Jan 28, 2007 05:38 PM  Permalink
MR.VERGHESE,PAAKISTHAN - A STATE CONTROLED BY THOSE GOONS WHO LEFT DEMOCRATIC INDIA UNDER VARIOUS PRETEXT. PAKIS ARE NOT EXPECTED TO BEHAVE OTHER THAN THE WAY YOU HAVE BEAUTIFULLY CHARACTERISED!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:WHO IS MUSHRAAF?
by Karthik Soundar on Jan 28, 2007 06:23 PM  Permalink
Yah world is wakeing up to that very fast..Muslims r good ppl, but Islam is bad.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:Is something behind this review?
by smita ghoshsingh on Jan 28, 2007 08:01 PM  Permalink
i agree with u so much...i think when its a big banner people are scared to say that it was sh**.the reviewer seemed to be so biased.as if she was paid for it.what do u say?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
don't belive
by shrimant mane on Jan 28, 2007 04:52 PM  Permalink 

General is right. his committment is really unshakable. but only problem is with the defination of terrorism. for him despite bloodshade of poor, innocent people in kasmir is not the terrorism, but the freedom fighting and he has another defination for POK with same situation. so it couldnot be belived.
shrimant mane, akola

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: Commitment to Rule
by Kumar Rahul on Jan 28, 2007 04:51 PM  Permalink 

Speaks like a dictator. Great balancing act.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 27 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2
Write a message