I am not sure who is good at governing UP and Bihar for the betterment and devlopment of both states..what i know..both these states are head ache for the india itself in all perspectives... Better president should rule both states...ie better democracy...or give both to Japan/UK leased for 100 yrs..then India will become a developed Nation very fast...Finally ..what every one wants..is education and basic lifestyle food as long as they live in india..right.
This will be right step for immidiate president rule in up, it become very late , for central govt. and suprem court to take desison, such types formation of govt. should also not allow, this is againce constitutional and democresy, congres should not follow always politicaly. This type formmation of govt it is danger for democrecy, in this situation poor peoples r not safe, communist should also not belive on terrorism, by getting done killing of weakers/labours will not solbe political problemes of some ones, they should thing about county and their people, by confusing public/killing them/making their wroung path is not good for the nation. I requet to all the political parties and the leaders make some constitutional rules such that to avoide these type of situation to arise, any person who has been elected by the people should work for those people not after election they should jump from one party to any party for their own profit, such people should be thrown to jail. their should be such kind of punishment.The leader who r only based on terrorism etc they r not the leader. terrorism ALAGAVBAD is ruled out, we should not work in our country like any our forces should for anemy, we all shoul work hard, for productive and welfare for our country and our people, govt should make such rule to root out terrorism/cast/religon hate diffrences/corruption , for happy and prospurousnes for the indvisual. with best wishes to all
traditionally its the dravidian parties that have championed the cause of federalism and decentralisation of powers from the centre to state and have been steadfast against article 356. with this they lose all their credibility (if anything is left). congress has always been arrogant towards state governments and this govt with educated, law abiding ministers (itself a luxury for India) to make a decision like this is disappointing to say the least. will we ever have some morality in politics?
RE:its disappointing
by IndiaN ParroT on Feb 19, 2007 02:24 AM Permalink
you must be an idiot. Do you see the plight of the people in UP or not. are you frigging BLIND. Those guys do not deserve to rule the land
RE:RE:its disappointing
by felix nicholas on Feb 19, 2007 02:33 AM Permalink
does modi deserve to rule the land?. what did we do about that. stop calling names. try to be civilised and not like mulayam, modi, togadia etc
RE:RE:RE:its disappointing
by on Feb 19, 2007 04:05 AM Permalink
Modi does not only deserve to be a CM but also should be PM of INDIA. Go and ask the common people in Gujarat and you'll get the same answer. Fools like you won't understand the reality on the ground.
RE:RE:RE:RE:its disappointing
by Mahesh Sampat on Feb 19, 2007 04:42 AM Permalink
IndiaNparroT's message calling names of every one opposing his stand is silly & childish . He has to grow up! Mr Indian parrot, don't keep parroting your HitlerModi's rhymes all the time.Just like the gujaratis want Modi the UP people may want Mulayam! It is for the people of UP to decide who they want & not imbecile wimps like your kind!
Though i am a congress supporter.........it will be a blunder to dismiss the Govt.....let mulayam carry this headache.......let him face aseembly and prove his majority.....
Why all has to blame DMK? this is supreme court's decission to disqualify MLA'S in UP. Because of that MK took that stand. There is no other option so the UP government should go. Are these people blaming MK because they dislike him. MK is right on his stand, dont spoil supreme court's verdict.
Why dmk into picture, its UP&Centre decision and direction on its path. None can interfere even though the parties in centre collaborated. it does not mean that always or mandatory to take the input of party leaders. All its requires is to prove majority in either parliment or state house. Its enough. let us not give more hype to our parties. Just leave it as it is. These kind of drama will be there always and its not new to politics. To survey in politics , infact it needs. Otherwise, by this time, MK would have been chaired for any copanies owned rather now chaired as TN chief.
- Either 356 or 386 is not the issue. If the decision is good to majority then always centre can move it forward on..
