Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9683 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 321 | 322 | 323 | 324 | 325   Older >   >>
Aurangzeb
by PM MP on Feb 16, 2007 05:56 PM  Permalink 

Born to rule India and Secular Indian Leaders and born Secular Leftists have conspired since beginning to teach incorrect history in India....these people are interested in minority votes only. Artivles like this must be read and a debate should be initiated to expose the Secular Leaders and their open Agenda!!!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
what is abusive in this message?????
by on Feb 16, 2007 05:55 PM  Permalink 

i have been posting this message as a reply to some one slandering mud over hinduism, over 30 mins, but it is constantly kept hiddenby the moderator. see the hidden message, and enjoy.



scroll down to the first message which has been hidden coz of "abuse" (?????!!!!!!). plz read n post ur opinion





    Forward  |  Report abuse
TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Anis Khan on Feb 16, 2007 05:51 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Plz. read the article published in TIMES of INDIA, I have the cutting, who ever wants will sent you. I am writing the the highlighted matter written by " SWAMINATHAN ANKLESARIA AIYAR" " Within India, Maoists pose a far greater threat than muslims militants in one third of India. But major cities fell threatened only by Muslims groups. So the national elite focus on Muslim terrorism. He has proved it with many example throughout the world. His one paragraph says " In sum, terrorism is certainly not a muslim monopoly. There are or have been terrorists groups among Christians, JEWS, Hindus, Sikhs and even buddhists. Secular terrorist anarchists, Maoists have been the biggest killers." So why target only one Community just the MUSLIMS. PLz. everyone see the facts first don't just listen and do, Plz. check the facts.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Cyber hinwa on Feb 16, 2007 11:32 PM  Permalink
A muslim whose ancestors was terrorised and slaughtered then
they were ultimately forced to become Muslim has written a
book were he critically analyses the terror handbook "QURAN".
No other religion can match the ferocity and the violence which
is advocated in this book , Violence against Jews , Christians
and any other religions is explained in detailed . It is a monstorous
creation of a perverted mind .

Major parts are mentioned for all those to see and understand the
facade behind the religion of peace [ uuugggggghh] .I have digitised
the book and i have uploaded to the link wherein you can download
if you are not afraid required ,

http://rapidshare.com/files/16716007/The_Islamic_Jehad.pdf.html

I particularly recommend the reading of verses to verses explanation
which no muslim will deny it is not written . If you like it tell your friends
about it and email it to as many people as possible.

Comments and responses awaited at cyberhinwa@gmail.com ,

CYBERHINWA

Question for all Muslims : If PISSLAM is about peace why do Muslims justify to other religions that PISSLAM is religion of peace instead of telling their own Muslims and stop KILLING innocents ????????


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Anis Khan on Feb 16, 2007 06:39 PM  Permalink
I think you are just interesting in highlighting MUSLIMS as Militants. My friend don't do this.You know it is not the FACT

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Nadeem Reshi on Feb 16, 2007 10:03 PM  Permalink
Cyber Hinwa... If 99.999% of terrorists would have been Muslims, you would not have been born in the first place.
Dont forget the LTTE, Who are those?
How bout Militants in Punjab? Who were those?
They were not muslims, so please correct youself
Thanks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Santa on Feb 16, 2007 06:00 PM  Permalink
Read properly. His post reads ... muslim militants ... and not muslims. What are you trying to prove here? That muslims are roaming the streets of each and every city, town and village, searching for people to kill? I have no idea what you are trying to extract from people. Are you a lawyer by any chance? :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Cyber hinwa on Feb 16, 2007 05:56 PM  Permalink
YESSSSSSSSSSSSS SIRS YESSS

BUT 99.999% OF TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS .... WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY TO THAT

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by sa sa on Feb 16, 2007 07:14 PM  Permalink
togadia and bal thackrey are not muslims

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Bharath Patriot on Feb 16, 2007 09:26 PM  Permalink
ISLAM propogates HATE against anyone who is not a Muslim and calls them 'KAFIR' ... So if a Muslim does not hate then he is NO Muslim AT ALL. And if he hates and follows what ISLAM preaches then he is a Muslim who can exceed the limit of hate at any point to be a 'TERRORIST' of today under the banner of 'JEHAD'. SO WORLD BEWARE !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Santa on Feb 16, 2007 06:02 PM  Permalink
Definition of terrorist varies depending on the context.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Santa on Feb 16, 2007 06:35 PM  Permalink
Minor correction. They are terrorists only for people who try to terrorize them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Anis Khan on Feb 16, 2007 06:41 PM  Permalink
Are YOU a DOCTOR " does any blood sample proves it. And what you are friend see in the Mirror.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:TERRORISM is not a Muslim monopoly
by Anis Khan on Feb 16, 2007 06:43 PM  Permalink
Are you counting every terrorist. Are you part of it since one can do only if he is part of Terrorist Group.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:HISTORY OF SEXUAL TERROR
by Anis Khan on Feb 16, 2007 05:57 PM  Permalink
My friend get the CD of Aamir Khans Mangal Pandey " many of them must have seen it does the Britishers were not keeping SEXUAL LAbours for them. Britishers had supplied WINE & Mistress to many Kings /Rajas whether Muslim Ruler or Hindu Ruler to make all Indians slaves.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
its right here!!!
by on Feb 16, 2007 05:47 PM  Permalink 

i ahve been posting this message as a reply to some one slandering mud over hinduism, over 30 mins, but it is constantly kept hiddenby the moderator. see the hidden message, and enjoy.



scroll down to the first message which has been hidden coz of "abuse" (?????!!!!!!). plz read n post ur opinion

    Forward  |  Report abuse
it is just below!!!
by on Feb 16, 2007 05:44 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

scroll down to the first message which has been hidden coz of "abuse" (?????!!!!!!). plz read n post ur opinion

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:it is just below!!!
by Anis Khan on Feb 16, 2007 06:04 PM  Permalink
You have a problem frienb, I just read "Muslims can very well live in peace and harmony with people of other religions, it is their obligation to give respect to other religions but a muslim cannot follow any other religion along with islam." Where he has said Muslims cannot live with other Religions. Comeon yay don't manipulate things.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9683 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 321 | 322 | 323 | 324 | 325   Older >   >>
Write a message