RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 05, 2007 10:47 PM Permalink
Dear Brother Bhasker, I am proud I am Indian, but not belonging to any fascit gang (RSS, BJP, BD & SHIV SENA). I think you are lost intellegence case like jews. For your kind information Islam is fastest grwoing religion in USA, UK and Europe. And ofcourse, George Bush is not Aurangzeb. He is not forcing American to embrace the Islam.
RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 05, 2007 10:52 PM Permalink
well, the jews have managed with 100 or so nobel lauretes for the hundred years with a dismal 10 million population. I don't think they are lost intellgence case. I doubt your though. You must be another guy who believes in these things. And about Islam growing fast in USA, UK, i will let it pass given the reasoning ability in your other posts. But it's true. People breed fast, when they breed like rats.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 05, 2007 11:08 PM Permalink
you are typing crazy and insane now. what next. Don't you have a stable mind.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 06, 2007 12:10 AM Permalink
You don't seem to have many things to say here. That's your problem and frustration comes from that. So you are showing your individual character instead. Don't you think it sucks dude. the way you post irrelevantly :-)
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 05, 2007 11:52 PM Permalink
you are barking at the wrong tree. anyway, do you know that there are lower castes in Muslims too which the stupid sachar committe report particularly mentions. That people use separate mosques and there are Muslims who are treated as untoucable in Villages and a section of them are alloted to look after graveyards and that is a caste too. Islam will not grow through conversion in India man, you people don't have the acumen to grow and influence others and others have become a lot ideologically superior now through reformations while you still hide your women in burqas and other backward, regressive ways which remains unattractive. It has reached it's saturation and even the dalits of both communties have hedged against eachother. What you will observe will be the reverse trend.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 06, 2007 12:06 AM Permalink
God thanks I am not frustated. Neither will be. But you and your community are very much frustated about your rotten rules in hinduism like bride burning, one wife for all brohters and cousins like pandwas and dowry not allowing dalits to enter in mandirs and inhumane treatment with them. For that ONLY ISLAM CAN GIVE THEM RESPECTFULL LIFE AND DIGNITY.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Dr_Ramanand Rao on Mar 09, 2007 01:03 PM Permalink
Mike Gandu, When you treat women in general like as if they were your animals (?camels) I don't think you should comment about others. Why animals - because you sell your daughters, because you marry as many women as you like, having upto 4-7 at a time and divorcing any of them by just saying, 'Talaaq' thrice
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Mahesh Sampat on Mar 06, 2007 05:16 AM Permalink
These outbursts by Mike gandhi & patient replies by Chaitanya kumar are really,really hilarious.These guys are taking each other seriously. I'm laughing my guts out man.This is far better than any of the comedy movies I've ever seen !!! Keep it up boys ! We are having the time of our lives !!!
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 06, 2007 12:11 AM Permalink
well, i will stop it here. i don't want to persecute you anymore.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 05, 2007 11:43 PM Permalink
God thanks I am not frustated. Neither will be. But you and your community are very much frustated about your rotten rules in hinduism like bride burning, one wife for all brohters and cousins like pandwas and dowry not allowing dalits to enter in mandirs and inhumane treatment with them. For that ONLY ISLAM CAN GIVE THEM RESPECTFULL LIFE AND DIGNITY.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 05, 2007 11:36 PM Permalink
O' YOU JEWS, HINDUS AND CHRISTIANS; EMBRACE THE ISLAM AND BECOME OUR BROTHERS/SISTERS AND JOIN THE HANDS TO FIGHT AGAINST IMPERIALISTS & BRAHMIN INJUSTICE WITH POOR PEOPLE.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 05, 2007 11:29 PM Permalink
Mike Gandhi, i fail to understand how you ARE still sitting before your desktop and typing shit here when you have better things waiting for you. Like admitting yourself in a jehadi school and join the Bin Laden's army to blow yourself and become a martyr. or beheading somebody as a sacrifice to Allah. Fine things waiting for you. Pack your bags and take a flight to Kandahar man.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 05, 2007 11:39 PM Permalink
this is how a guy cornered types. Nonsense. What you say seems very feeble and irreleavant here. Preachings and proselytizations are done where you have the show of strength. You don't seem to have it here.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Dr_Ramanand Rao on Mar 09, 2007 12:56 PM Permalink
if we start embracing Islam, believe me, you won't be alive, because we will become just as aggressive and intolerant as you
RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Perv Sharma on Mar 06, 2007 12:52 PM Permalink
Go back to Madarasa and learn again regarding your grand parents - the jews. The jews taught mohammed a lot.
In modern times they a handful were enough for all the islamic might. No doubt around 700 to 1700 A.D. the islamic religion from Arab lands grew by force and in effect that's why it was fastest growing. But, now they have faced defeat everywhere and every not almost every but every Islamic country of Arabia is under America indirectly or directly including Pakistan.
RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Dr_Ramanand Rao on Mar 09, 2007 12:54 PM Permalink
the RSS, BJP, BD & Shiv Sena came up only to fight the Islamic fundamentalism (and the support it gets from the Congress-I) that has spoiled this country's secular fabric
RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Ramesh P on Mar 07, 2007 05:07 AM Permalink
Good CUT AND PASTE work from another islamic facist website. Are you using this platform for intellectual Jihad, asking ppl to convert?? You talk of "lost intelligence cases like jews", just go and see how many Noble prizes went to them. You will never win an intellectual jihand, especially against Hindus and Jews as Quran is full of lies, terrorism and discrimination.
RE:RE:Mike Gandhi is a Islamic Facist zealot
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 10:49 PM Permalink
Bull shit. You are a fanatic Islamist. Thankfully the world now knows, specially Indians.
Every action of you and your gang of Islamo-Facists will now be hunted down all over the world.
The way they wrote it seems to mental case and should be diagnoised. Do read some good books healthy for you. The way you people writing is it nothing but mental sickness.
1.In the tenure of Aurangzeb the Hindus were in majority 90% Mulsims.
2.The Military Commanders and Chief Officers, Soldiers majority of them Hindus.
3.The majority of the territories controlled by Hindus.
4.Aurangzeb was so cruel and amazingly he ruled more than 50 years.
5.His period regarded is the peaceful and he was having biggest state
6.The story is very very true. Try to find facts. When you will get fact, you will keep quite for ever.
7.Give your children good education, otherwise as you sow you will reap. You can abuse me say whatever you like I dont mind. I know those who talk rubbish they are just garbage.
RE:Reply to Golu Gayani, Bhaskar,Chaitanaya Kumar and others.
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 10:38 PM Permalink
Precisely this mindset of erasing atrocities of fanatic Islamic rulers, worse heaping praise on them as being donw now is major reason for degradation of societal tolerance in India.
Make no mistake, these Islamo-Facists and their friends will be facing increasing Hindu agner wherever they go.
RE:Reply to Golu Gayani, Bhaskar,Chaitanaya Kumar and others.
by chaitanya kumar on Mar 05, 2007 10:41 PM Permalink
The Marxist Historians in ICSE school books really have managed to write the changes caused by Islamic rulers as very subtle and "secular" way as part of the culture that should be considered Indian through some selective picking of History and mixing it with the divisions in Hinduism. But i remember passing out of the school with memories of Aurangzeb as the cruel guy among all the Mughal rulers even with all the sham the revisionists applied. He will be perceived as a monster if all facts come to light.
You need to learn something outside the bounds of Muslim cummnity about the destruction inflicted on the rest of the humanity to get a broader view and some dose of mental therapy. The thing is, you people with all your stories manage do only one thing. Make the Hindus defensive. I don't know of many Hindus who would comment on Mohammed's tirade with children before, but they seem do the catch up. All your twisted stories do is, make your life dangerous in India depending on your propensity to abuse that way.
RE:RE:Reply to Golu Gayani, Bhaskar,Chaitanaya Kumar and others.
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 10:46 PM Permalink
Chaitanya: these people are NOT secular - they are rabid communalist who see everything thro' the prism of religion.
Marxists made huge mistake by erasing these parts, however don't worry, they are present in 2 many places of popular history/
The days of these Islamists (as well as their cheer leader marxists) are numbered.
The Mughal Empire Aurangzeb was very brave and honest ruler of India. The Brahmin loby pandits and pujari was kidnapping and raping young girls and brides those were visiting mandirs for puja. once a Raja and his family going Delhi. on their way to Delhi they stayed in varansi. Raja's wife visit Gyanvapi Mandir. She was very beautiful and wearing precious jewllearies. The pujaris asked her to come in basement of mandir for darshan of Devi. She went down. She gang raped by pujaris. When she returned to Raja, and she complained. Raja sent complaint to Shahenshah Aurengzeb. Shahenshah sent investigation team. They unearth horroable facts. They found that the Pujarees & Brahmins are traping the very young girls and women in the basement of mandir, raping them and killing them. These Pujarees discared the mandirs in the of Puja Archana. Majority of sadus and sants asked Shahenshah to demolished these mandirs. These mandirs were become brothel and hunting ground of Dalit young girls. When shahensah investigated, he found several famous mandirs converted sex/brothel by criminal pujarees. Upon the request of common hindus he distroyed these criminal places.
RE:aurangzeb
by Dr_Ramanand Rao on Mar 09, 2007 01:12 PM Permalink
the reason for the demolition (so that Hindus don't re-group) is listed in the farmaans of Aurangzeb availble in the museums Gautier mentions above - no 'common Hindu' asked him to demolish these temples
RE:aurangzeb
by pankaj sharma on Mar 07, 2007 02:44 PM Permalink
What Mike says is all bullxxxx where is he getting the facts from . I think he is Muslims signed with fake name
RE:aurangzeb
by nadia sani on Mar 07, 2007 03:29 AM Permalink
It would be interesting to know the source of this and other posts' information.Fairy tales do not constitute history, and while I am certain that good and evil exist in all societies as they do today, I do not subscribe to a history that is made up of distorted views as expressed and maipulated by the readers here, without any factual proof.
If Aurangazeb(R.A) was so cruel....then no hindu would have been left on this earth. We Indians are good at manipulating the history. What proof can anyone provide that he has destroyed the temples...its just another tactic to say that Indians can be divided easily by digging the past and people like politicians and foreigners can rule on us and give more pain than what you think like Aurangazeb(R.A) as done.
Wake up and help one another and help develop our country.
RE:shah
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 09:51 PM Permalink
And it also highlights that Conversion to Islam makes one dumb, whol;ly illogical.
Its a NEUROTIC JOURNEY WHERE INVADER SUDDENLY BECOMES THE SAVIOUR!
90% of Indian Muslims were force converted. However, after conversion to Islam, they behave in such a way, brainwashed they START SEEING THE CULPRIT AS SAVIOUR!
RE:shah
by Dr_Ramanand Rao on Mar 09, 2007 01:50 PM Permalink
Sanathana Dharma/Hinduism was not wiped out because of help from time to time by Gurus and Yogis - the Saptarishi, Raghavendra Swami, Sant Tukaram etc. The farmaans Aurangzeb issued to destroy temples can be seen by one and all in the museums Gautier mentioned - no manipulation happened here.
RE:shah
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 10:08 PM Permalink
They very fact you have put RA after Arrangjeb's name and put the word "Indian" at the bottom is a sheer hypocracy.
RA is used in Islamic context to show respect to somebody.
Here is a zealot who raised 100s of temples, Stupas, introduced Ziziya and was most brutal to indigeneous people (including your forefathers).
Its this mind set to erase atrocities perpetrated by people who have no relation with Indian Muslims except nominally on religion WHICH CREATE PROBLEM IN INDIA.
Psuedos allowed this to continue for so long. HOWEVER BE ASSURED, PEOPLE WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS ANYMORE.
No version of secularism can save those who want to show respect to person like Aurangjeb, the most fundamentalist ruler of Mughal era.
RE:shah
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 09:48 PM Permalink
Islamic rule erased ALL indigeneous civilization, converted people by force EXCEPT India where they failed NOT because they were good, but Hindus were too many, too powerful.
Look at what happens under Islamic rule in Paki land and Bangladesh which for all practical purpose is part of Indian history for last 5000 years.
RE:shah
by Ramesh P on Mar 07, 2007 05:14 AM Permalink
Pak got independence in 1947, hindus were 28% then, now its 1.2%. Bangla got independence in 1971, hindus were 30% then and now they are 6%. The present day muslims are worse then Aurangzeb and no wonder the present day muslims see aurangzeb as good (he is better than them infact).
I must add, I don't blame present day Indian Muslims for these acts of Aurangjeb, because they themselves were victims and were converted by force.
Moreover, these rulers were from foreign land, or at least traced their origin from foreign land. Even Syed Ahmed Khan who founded Aligarh Muslim University, when asked in London whether he was an Indian, he answered he is NOT an India and traced his origin from Arabia (see a book on Aligarh movement aritten by a eminent Muslim intellectual Mushirul Hasan)
Marxists tried to white wash these. Large sections of Muslims, specially Educated class (from Aligarh) were/are in denial. For uneducated Muslims, they think as a Muslim, they cannot condemn acts of another muslim.
INDIAN Muslims must understand that, by denying these atrocities unseen in world scale, they are creating more suspicion, confusion in peoples mind. Not even BJP/RSS blame present day muslims for those.
BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN, WE CAN FORGET THESE HUGE OPPRESSION, DESTRUCTION DURING FOREIGN RULE. THAT LIKE WHITEWASHING HOLOCAUST.
