We Saw Aurangzeb's Islam at its best recently in Afganistan. The Islamic Taliban destroyed the Buddha Idols and then asked the minority Hindus to Mark their houses specifically to differentiate them. The Masters of Muslims the Arabs don't allow other religions to build their temples.
You Musilms are lucky that other religions are tolerant and allow U all to worship without fear.
RE:RE:Aurangzeb's Islam
by Padmakumar Menon on Mar 13, 2007 02:36 PM Permalink
You see the whole world will accept the tolerant muslims with folded hands, even if the person is a follower of vhp or siva sena...see the example of gujarat...good and tolerant muslims are still living therewithout fear and favour.....but remember the hindu community will stand united against the perpetraters of godhra, 9/11, destroyer of budha statues...there are thousand examples...even pakistan is bourn out of hatred....
RE:RE:Aurangzeb's Islam
by Perv Sharma on Mar 13, 2007 02:40 PM Permalink
Hello babu
Which place were U born? I would like to see U become a Refugee is your own country and that too if U belong to the Majority Community ?
IF you are a Muslim your comment is understable and I can give the exact reply and if you are a hindu then tell me how many Hindu Refugees have migrated from Kashmir and where are they living? What is the media doing about this? What are the political parties doing about this?
Nothing Buddy, nothing? If you kill one Muslim U will get get surrounded by thousands to kill U. If a Hindu is killed by muslims in Kashmir Who Cares is the attitude of Everybody because for political parties their votes don't count? Come on lets have a debate BABU or come and spend a week in my refugee camp.
Despite being treated badly for so many years the Marathas still let Aurangzeb live because he was praying at the moment he raided his tent. Whereas this horrible mongrel didn't even spare children of Guru Govind Singh because they refused to convert to Islam. Rafi and Mike - this dirt of islam is one reason why the world over today they want to wipe it off.
Regarding Aurangzeb being a true Islamic follower - compare which religion is true to human kind if you consider Aurangzeb a true islamic follower by this example .
The tortured death given to Shivaji's Son whereas the Maratha soldiers on entering Aurangzeb's tent found him praying and therefore decided against killing him at that moment but to show him how near to him they had come they took away his Emperor's Diamond from the top of the Tent.
Hindus have shown similar cases for Mohammed Ghouri 1000 years ago when a defeated Ghouri was allowed to go back.
History was repeated in 1971 when Hindu Army again treated the enemy Islamic forces of Pakistan with dignity and allowed them to return. The surrender is till today the most number of POWs in a war.
Just compare how the hindus treated those islamic soldiers killed in Kargil and how the hindu POWS were treated by these Islamic followers.
A religion is great only if it teaches you basic hunman values which unfortunately Islam lacks.
Stop preaching about SC / ST etc. in Hinduism. Hindus have realised and have made amends to remove the same which shows they are welcome to change. What about you Mullahs Laws - How do you treat a Woman. Regarding your Law and REligion, Don't preach to us your Copy and Paste Religon from Jews plus your Barbaric Laws from Arabs.
Mike & Rafi Mullah don't shut your eyes and keeping shouting loudly? People will assume you to be Follwers of Dog rather than your Allah.
Some of the Hindu historians have accused Aurangzeb of demolishing Hindu Temples. How factual is this accusation against a man, who has been known to be a saintly man, a strict adherent of Islam? The Qur%u2019an prohibits any Muslim to impose his will on a non-Muslim by stating that "There is no compulsion in religion." (Qur%u2019an: Surah al-Baqarah). The Surah al-Kafiroon (The Unbelievers) clearly states: "To you is your religion and to me is mine." It would be totally unbecoming of a learned scholar of Islam of his caliber, as Aurangzeb was known to be, to do things which are contrary to the dictates of the Qur%u2019an. Interestingly, the 1946 edition of history text book, Etihash Parichaya (Introduction to History), used in Bengal, published by the Hindustan Press, 10 Ramesh Dutta Street, Calcutta, for the 5th and 6th graders states: "If Aurangzeb had the intention of demolishing temples to make way for mosques, there would not have been a single temple standing erect in India. On the contrary, Aurangzeb donated huge estates for use as Temple sites and support thereof in Benares, Kashmir and elsewhere. The official documentations for these land grants are still extant."
Most Hindus like Akbar over Aurangzeb for his multi-ethnic court where Hindus were favored. Historian Shri Sharma states that while Emperor Akbar had 14 Hindu Mansabdars (high officials) in his court, Aurangzeb actually had 148 Hindu high officials in his court. (Ref: Mughal Government) But this fact is somewhat less known. It does not require much intelligence to understand the difference between 14 and 148. But when truth is hostage to bigotry, facts are substituted for fiction, 148 may appear to be smaller than 14 to disingenuous historians, and that is an unfortunate reality we face.
RE:LIES AGAINST SHAHENSHAH AURANGZEB
by Secular Indian on Mar 13, 2007 03:43 AM Permalink
Aurangzeb had to bribe the Hindu Zamindars/Rajas to get them into his orbit, secondly he badly needed the taxes and the only way was by making (temporary) pacts with the Zamindars (Rajas).
