RE:RE:MY THREE QUESTIONS FOR DR ZAKIR NAIK
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 19, 2007 09:48 PM Permalink
DEAR WADA,
TYPE THE NAME OF DR. ZAKIR NAIK, THEN SO MANY SITES WILL APPEAR, FIND OUT HIS E.MAIL AND SEND YOUR QUESTIONS. YOU WILL GET THE PROPER ANSWER. I REQUEST YOU PLEASE READ AND WATCH HIS BOOKS AND VIDEO CDS ON "SIMILARITIES BETWEEN ISLAM AND HINDUISM". I AM SURE YOU WILL ENJOY IT AND GET THE KNOWLEDGE
RE:RE:RE:RE:MY THREE QUESTIONS FOR DR ZAKIR NAIK
by wada pav on Mar 19, 2007 09:51 PM Permalink
Please do me a favor, please forward my questions to him, and post his replies on this site.I will be grateful
RE:RE:RE:MY THREE QUESTIONS FOR DR ZAKIR NAIK
by Secular Indian on Mar 20, 2007 03:00 AM Permalink
He is a nincompoop and a fraud, good enough only to preach to the gullible. His 2 plus 2 equals 4 therefore you can't have a temple in Saudia Arabia logic is hilarious. The video is floating on YouTube somewhere.
Aurangzeb would rule an incredibly long time, from 1658 to 1707. Under his tenure, the Mughal Empire expanded to its greatest limits, largely driven by wars of conquest under Aurangzeb's leadership. In particular, he led Mughal forces in the conquest of the Deccan, seizing first the Golkunda and Bijapur Sultanates, and then attacking the Maratha chieftains. He annexed all the Maratha territories, but he never managed to conquer the Marathas who continued to fight using guerilla tactics. While Aurangzeb is the last great conqueror of Mughal history, both Muslim and Western historians agree that the Empire had grown too large for Mughal administration.
Aurangzeb was driven by an intense Muslim piety. He insisted that the Shari'a become the law of the land, and forbade all drinking and gambling. The Hindu majority, accustomed to living according to Hindu law, the Dharmashastra , now found themselves facing Islamic law courts. Aurangzeb outlawed the Hindu practice of suttee in which widows voluntarily killed themselves by throwing themselves on the funeral pyre of their husbands. More seriously, however, was Aurangzeb's repeal of all taxes that were not specifically authorized in Islamic law or tradition
Was it true? Dr Pande wrote immediately to the author and asked him for the source on which he had based this episode in his text-book. After several reminders, Dr Shastri replied that he had taken this information from the Mysore Gazetteer. So Dr Pande requested the Mysore University vice chancellor, Sir Brijendra Nath Seal, to verify for him Dr Shastri's statement from the Gazetteer. Sir Brijendra referred his letter to Prof Srikantia who was then working on a new edition of the Gazetteer. Srikantia wrote to say that the Gazetteer mentioned no such incident and, as a historian himself, he was certain that nothing like this had taken place. Prof Srikantia added that both the prime minister and the commander-in-chief of Tipu Sultan were themselves Brahmins. He also enclosed a list of 136 Hindu temples which used to receive annual grants from the Sultan's treasury.
Very informative article on Aurangazeb has been brought from somebody who has liberal thinking of taking past history, not as an excuse to harm people belonging to the muslim community to which aurangazeb belonged. It has to be impressed upon that aurangazeb was equally cruel on both the muslims and the hindus, who did not obey his style of following of the sunni islam concept. There are plenty of examples of good muslim rulers in india other than aurangazeb. thats the reason why so many more temples in india still existed and even made during the 300 years of muslim rule. We can also find many many hindu rulers who were cruel, intolerant towards their subjects who were mostly hindus. Fortunately or unfortunately, during the period of hindu rule, there were no muslims in India to know how the hindu rulers would have dealth with the muslim subjects. And during the advent of muslim rule in India. The hindus had various experience (good or bad ) about the muslim rulers. It happened that after the collapse of the muslim empire in India, the British took control and after the collapse of british rule, India became independent. So my dear brothers, can the hindus now take the revenge for the wrongs of a single muslim ruler (aurangazeb) as they have just now got the chance to act similarly as barbaric as aurangazeb. They should also remember to thank for all the good times and deeds done by other muslim rulers......?
In his famous Khuda Bakhsh Annual Lecture (1985) Dr Pande said: 'Thus under a definite policy the Indian history books text-books were so falsified and distorted as to give an impression that the medieval [i.e. Muslim] period of Indian history was full of atrocities committed by Muslim rulers on their Hindu subjects and the Hindus had to suffer terrible indignities under Muslim rule. And there were no common factors [between Hindus and Muslims] in social, political and economic life.'
Therefore, Dr Pande was extra careful. Whenever he came across a 'fact' that looked odd to him, he would try to check and verify rather than adopt it uncritically.
He came across a history text-book taught in the Anglo-Bengali College, Allahabad which claimed that 'three thousand Brahmins had committed suicide as Tipu wanted to convert them forcibly into the fold of Islam'. The author was a very famous scholar, Dr Har Prashad Shastri, head of the department of Sanskrit at Calcutta University. (Tipu Sultan (1750-99), who ruled over the South Indian state of Mysore (1782-99), is one of the most heroic figures in Indian history. He died on the battlefield, fighting the British.)
Pakistan, Bangladesh,Malaysia, Iran and other Arab Countries women in different fields. Pakistan and Bangladesh had thre woman Prime Minsters. The Pakistan parliament has 50% reservation for Woman. More than 25% Business Woman in G.C.C. Pakistan has many woman commercial and combat pilots. Captain Hanadi Hindi first woman pilot of Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia many Muslims women working in the offices. Saudi Arabia Government opening working segments according to the requirement. Taking all measure and considering safety, security and their cultural values to be safe-guard and keep Islam banner high. Driving Woman is no problem in Saudi Arabia. The King asked woman representatives that what do they say. They say conditions is not yet feasible. They know what is better for their country. We have to see what is better for our country.
When you people talk senselessly I know those who lost they act like this. The Wada Pav got mad I do not know from where got these all record. I think he got a mysterious dairy of Golworker.
RE:RE:WHY DO MUSLIMS ENCIRCLE KABA 7 TIMES AT HAJ?
by wada pav on Mar 19, 2007 09:36 PM Permalink
u kicked them out ,true,but u still follow their practice of encircling the kaba 7 times!
RE:RE:RE:WHY DO MUSLIMS ENCIRCLE KABA 7 TIMES AT HAJ?
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 19, 2007 09:55 PM Permalink
CONTACT TO DR. ZAKIR NAIK, THE CORRECT ANSWER HE WILL GIVE YOU.
RE:RE:RE:RE:WHY DO MUSLIMS ENCIRCLE KABA 7 TIMES AT HAJ?
by Secular Indian on Mar 20, 2007 03:02 AM Permalink
Dr Zakir Naik logic is hilarious hahahaha.. 2 plus 2 equals 4 therefore you can't have a temple in Saudi Arabia.
Lord Curzon (Governor General of India 1895-99 and Viceroy 1899-1904, d.1925) was told by the Secretary of State for India, George Francis Hamilton, that they 'should so plan the educational text books that the differences between community and community are further strengthened'.
Another Viceroy, Lord Dufferin (1884-88), was advised by the Secretary of State in London that the 'division of religious feelings is greatly to our advantage', and that he expected 'some good as a result of your committee of inquiry on Indian education and on teaching material'.
'We have maintained our power in India by playing-off one part against the other,' the Secretary of State for India reminded yet another Viceroy, Lord Elgin (1862-63), 'and we must continue to do so. Do all you can, therefore, to prevent all having a common feeling.'
However, the noted Indian scholar and historian, Dr Bishambhar Nath Pande, who passed away in New Delhi on 1 June, ranked among the very few Indians and fewer still Hindu historians who tried to be a little careful when dealing with such history. He knew that this history was 'originally compiled by European writers' whose main objective was to produce a history that would serve their policy of divide and rule.
