This is the new word comes for Francois Gautier Intellectual Prostitution. But I do not agree. Because those who are biased, lies, having bad conscience. they are not intellectuals they are just lost intelligence or bad conscience people.
"They shall recline on jewelled couches face to face, and there shall wait on them immortal youths with bowls and ewers and a cup of purest wine (that will neither pain their heads nor take away their reason); with fruits of their own choice and flesh of fowls that they relish. And theirs shall be the dark-eyed houris, chaste as hidden pearls: a guerdon for their deeds... We created the houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand..."
Surah-al-rehman 55:272
'The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana'a [Yemen]'."
Al-Suyuti
Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetising vaginas."
RE:WHAT THEY GET IN HEAVEN
by raghav bhatt on Mar 21, 2007 12:14 PM Permalink
Dear Wada Pav, I am really thrilled by your work. Congrats. But, sad part is whatever you do these people will always say "Rabbit Has only three legs".It is as good as pouring water on rocks.I think you post these informations collected by you to Mr. Zakir Naik(The Great!)& will see whtawill be his interpretations(Because he is only interpretator who takes out the meaning of a sentence in Koran or even in Hinduism books according to his conveineance). Keep up the good work friend.
It is repeatedly discussed that Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam during Moghals. So How could our Hindu brotherssurvive to remain in majority. 1. By fighting against the moguls. 2. By running away from the Moghul rulers 3. By converting and then re-converting. One thousand years is a long period. Can a free thinking mind accept that. Rumors will remain rumors. Rumors can fool a society for a short time only.
RE:How the Hindus saved their religion during moghuls
by wada pav on Mar 20, 2007 11:54 PM Permalink
Did we remain a majority in Afghanistan , Pakistan , Bangladesh , Indonesia, Malaysia ?
what happened to the hindus there ?
in present day india we survived because of the brave resistance offered by Marathas , Sikhs , Rajputs and Jats.
Dr Pande was, however, just one individual. That made his work all the more important, not just from the Muslim but from the point of view of the entire country. India's deconstructed history is like a time bomb; unless it is defused, India cannot survive in one piece. Not for very long.
Bishambhar Nath Pande born on 23 December 1906 in the Madhya Pradesh of Umreth; member UP Legislative Assembly (1952-53); member UP Legislative Council (1972-74); twice member of the upper house, Rajya Sabha (1976 and 1982); Governor of Orissa state (1983-88); recipient of the highest national award Padma Shri (1976); author of several books, including The Spirit of India and The Concise History of Congress; died in New Delhi, 1 June 1998.
Dr Pande himself had been a senior member of the ruling Congress party which he had joined at a very young age. He was a disciple of Gandhi, a friend of Nehru; he had taken part in each and every non-cooperation movement against the British and gone to jail eight times.
The Congress was supposed to be an all-Indian nationalist platform and yet Dr Pande's party was hardly free from the bias and ignorance of a cleverly deconstructed history. The rise of militant Hindutva tendency is only recent, but before it all became overt, the Congress itself was doing the same, albeit a little covertly.
All the horrific anti-Muslim carnage took place during more than four decades of Congress rule. The doors of the Babari Mosque were opened for Hindu worship during the tenure of Nehru's grandson, Rajiv Gandhi. The Mosque itself was pulled down during the regime of another Congress Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao.
The inhumanity did not lie in the Indian nature, but the nature had fallen victim to the evil heritage of colonial history. Few realised how 1000 years of their history had been stolen from them. Many tended to buy the fake and doctored version handed down to them as part of their colonial heritage. Some even saw a little political advantage in this trade.
Dr Pande heard a leading Hindu Mahasabha politician and religious leader, Mahant Digvijaynath, telling an election meeting that it is written in the Qur'an that killing a Hindu was an act of goodness (thawab). Dr Pande called upon the Mahant (High Priest) and told him that he had read the Qur'an a few times but didn't find such a statement in it, and he had, therefore, brought with him several English, Urdu and Hindi translations of the Qur'an; so would he kindly point to him where exactly did the statement occur in the Qur'an?
Isn't it written there? said the Mahant. I haven't found it; if you have, please tell me, replied Dr Pande. Then what does it say? It speaks about love and brotherhood, about the oneness of mankind. What's jihad then? What is jizyah? How then India got partitioned? The Mahant went on asking, and Dr Pande kept on explaining, hoping the Mahant would correct himself. However, the Mahant's ideas were fixed, in prejudice and in ignorance.
One of the greatest charges against Aurangzeb is of the demolition of Vishwanath temple in Banaras (Varanasi). That was a fact, but Dr Pande unravelled the reason for it. 'While Aurangzeb was passing near Varanasi on his way to Bengal, the Hindu Rajas in his retinue requested that if the halt was made for a day, their Ranis may go to Varanasi, have a dip in the Ganges and pay their homage to Lord Vishwanath. Aurangzeb readily agreed.
'Army pickets were posted on the five mile route to Varanasi. The Ranis made journey on the palkis [palanquins]. They took their dip in the Ganges and went to the Vishwanath temple to pay their homage. After offering puja [worship] all the Ranis returned except one, the Maharani of Kutch. A thorough search was made of the temple precincts but the Rani was to be found nowhere.
'When Aurangzeb came to know of this, he was very much enraged. He sent his senior officers to search for the Rani. Ultimately they found that statue of Ganesh [the elephant-headed god which was fixed in the wall was a moveable one. When the statue was moved, they saw a flight of stairs that led to the basement. To their horror they found the missing Rani dishonoured and crying deprived of all her ornaments. The basement was just beneath Lord Vishwanath's seat.'
The Rajas demanded salutary action, and 'Aurangzeb ordered that as the sacred precincts have been despoiled, Lord Vishwanath may be moved to some other place, the temple be razed to the ground and the Mahant [head priest] be arrested and punished'.
(B N Pande, Islam and Indian Culture, Khuda Bakhsh Oriental Public Library, Patna, 1987)
RE:THE GREAT MOGHUL EMPEROR - AURANGZEB
by wada pav on Mar 20, 2007 11:26 PM Permalink
WOW THIS MR PANDE SEEMS TO BE ON YOUR PAYROLL, JUSTIFYING EVERY EVIL ACT.
BY THE WAY WHAT WAS THE EXCUSE FOR DISTROYING THE MATHURA TEMPLE AND 10,000 OTHER TEMPLES ?
RE:THE GREAT MOGHUL EMPEROR - AURANGZEB
by raghav bhatt on Mar 21, 2007 12:32 PM Permalink
Dear Mike , are you aware that there is no evidence( or any litertury document) for this story.Aurngazeb never travelled to Bengal.Was he going for a picnic surrounded by Hindu Kings? what a joke!. If he is so tolerant then why he ordered for building of a Masjid. & what about the temple of Mathura ? There also may be a similar story is crafted by Mr. Pande. Then Mr. Pande has to tell over thousand such stories to prove that aurangzeb is tolerant.
1. Non-believers are called Dhimmis in Muslim States. The Non-Muslims have to pay levy, tax or Jizya.
2. The Non-Muslims Young Man who are eligible to pay not serving in the Army. The Old, Woman, children exempted.
3. This is not paid as bribe for practicing their faith, but rather as compensation for not serving in the Army.
4. The Muslim Government responsible for their protection by all means from crusading armies, tribal or communal warfare.
5. The special tax required of non-Muslim dhimmis under Islamic law, was actually less than zakat 2.5 percent.
6. All eligible Muslims have to pay zakat 2.5 percent.
7. All Muslims and Dhimmis have to pay Zakat on Farming 10 percent if the production is more than the Nisab(fixed amount decided by the Economist) or the person is eligible.
8. The Zakat is must for Muslims also some western writer miss-informed. Our First Caliph Abu Baker Siddiq R.A. Said if any body is not giving Zakat take by anyway if its war. So-called journalists scream that the Jizya is a tool of inequality, they fail to see that there is a tax levied on Muslims as well, the Zakat, which non-Muslims are not required to pay.
FOR YOU KIND INFORMATION.
We Muslims are ready to pay Jizya 2.5% and we will not pay house tax, land tax, income tax, sales tax and other taxes.
We are ready to join Police, Army and Air force give us chance and the Jobs.
The Government should give us Guarantee to protect from the Communal and other warfare%u2019s and genocides.
Today we are paying hell of taxes directly and indirectly and the fools still talk about the Jizya and other things. You people must understand this is all Propaganda against Islam. This already gave Islam a boost from West to East and North to South people reading about Islam and coming into the fold of Islam.
RE:Jizya - Jizya - Jizya - The Truth About Jizya. You Asked For It.
by wada pav on Mar 20, 2007 11:23 PM Permalink
WHAT BULLSHIT YOU ARTE PREACHING.
1, JIZIYA MEANS 'SHAME' TAX , 'DHIMMI'S MEANS LOW/INFERIOR
2. IT WAS 50% TO 70% OF INCOME, NOT 2.5%
3.MUSLIMS THEMSELVES WERE THE CRUSADING ARMIES, SO WHICH OTHER CRUSADING ARMIES THEY WILL PROTECT YOU AGAINST ?
4. IT REQUIRED THAT HINDUS WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO OWN AND RIDE HORSES.
5. HINDUS WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PRACTICE RELIGION OUTSIDE THEIR HOMES.
6. MUSLIMS WOULD HAVE TO BE INVITED TO ALL THEIR PRIVATE MEETINGS.
7. MUSLIMS WOULD BE ALLOWED TO STAY IN TEMPLES.
8. HINDUS WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RECONSTRUCT THEIR DESTROYED TEMPLES.
9.HINDUS WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RECONVERT CONVERTED HINDUS.
10. IF A HINDU IS UNABLE TO PAY THE TAX ,THEN HIS WOMEN WILL BE TAKEN AWAY.
11. HINDU WILL HAVE TO BOW TO EVERY MUSLIM ON THE STREET.
12.HINDUS CANNOT BUILD HOUSES IN MUSLIM NEIGHBOURHOOD.
SO JAZIYA WAS NOT JUST A TAX, IT WAS A SET OF 20 RESTRICTIONS, ONE OF WHICH WAS TAX.
ZAKAT IS INTERNAL MATTER OF MUSLIMS , JUST BECAUSE THEY PAY ZAKAT , WE CANNOT BE FORCED TO PAY JAZIYA. WE ARE NEITHER OBLIGED TO PAY JAZIYA NOR ZAKAT , BECAUSE YOUR RULES DON'T APPLY TO US.
RE:RE:Jizya - Jizya - Jizya - The Truth About Jizya. You Asked For It.
by bharatiya on Mar 21, 2007 02:24 PM Permalink
Keep it up wadapav!
Guru Gobind Singh Maharaj Said - "Sava lakh se ek ladawan..tan Gobind Singh naam padhawan" You are really giving it back to this Paki Army. I'm your fan.
The response was overwhelming; he got farmans from several principal Hindu and jain temples, even from Sikh Gurudwaras in northern India. These farmans, issued between 1659 and 1685, related to grant of jagir (large parcel of agricultural lands) to support regular maintenance of these places of worship.
Dr Pande's research showed that Aurangzeb was as solicitous of the rights and welfare of his non-Muslim subjects as he was of his Muslim subjects. Hindu plaintiffs received full justice against their Muslims respondents and, if guilty, Muslims were given punishment as necessary.
