Dear Brothers MIKE,EKLAVYAN/RAFI/GHOSH/- 1. We are living in Modern India which is in 21st Century.Time can not be brought back in Either 17th Century or in 7th Century. It is basic rule that Law of Land is to be accepted by every Citizen(while in ROME do as ROMANS).prhaps that is the reason why in saudi no one can worship apart from Islam atleast in Open/Public Place. but we are in INDIA which is not Arab and beleive me it can not become any other country either(America/Russia/China....) what ever is present law of land is to be followed. if some one is not accepting the fact then this planet has more than 210 nations and and he should choose the nation of his choice provided that nation also accepts. Aurangzeb is history and so His deed(what ever good or bad) if one French is saying something why those who beleive in him should get so much disturb that they start lossing thier calm and balance. after all thses are theories and no one can tell what is wrong or right.so Dear brothers instead of venoming poision against one another please remember that we are living in 21st Century. Right from Nero to Hitler or Yazid to Mao every person famous or infamous has its Follower and non Followers. it is only time immortal which will decide that who will Be remebered as what? Thanx
My dear Ekalavyan and people like Mike Gandhi etc, who hat shown utter hatred shown to me and abuse me. I am not at all annoyed as I can understand the your agony to know the truth which were washed by serious of unscrupulous leaders, religious and political both for their vested interest. You have right to deny anything like history of this country etc. by saying that some Brahmins or RSS or some mouthpiece etc. etc. have written all such nuisances and your claim would not surprise to any sensible person especially when you deny about your own ancestors, who had been living in this great country since hundred and thousand of years much before the Islamic invasion. If you dare to deny them than nothing is truth in the world, what a foolish thinking, denial of own existence. You are admirer of Arab invaders but do not have respected for your own ancestors only because they were Indian.
I again request you to introspect and dig the truth within yourself. I think you are the best judge.
In my earlier posting I had raised certain burning issues, and I am pasting these once again. I had discussed all these matters with my Muslim colleagues and friends (male and female both) and none had denied and the unanimous opinion that cordial relationship should be developed so that incidence like Godhra Train Carnage and subsequent aftermath is not repeated.
I reproduce the posting once again for my annoyed friends and others.
I have been reading the postings of readers, having different ideologies, but there are few ideologies, which everybody wants to believe or at least pose that they want to believe and among these are humanism, equality etc.,
Though the series of postings are here, quote, misquotes and thereafter the series of interpretations and misinterpretations - as per their own convenience and comfort - are there to substantiate their claim. There are many facts which probably is little difficult for an ordinary personal to understand even until and unless the person goes in deep or root to all those literature, examine their authenticity and gain over command over the language etc. etc. But there are many burning current (may of last 50 %u2013 60 years) issues, which even an ordinary person can understand and for that one need not to go to archival history, but is affecting their daily life very badly.
I would be using / referring few words, quite frequently in my subsequent paragraphs and therefore would like to explain the meaning to avoid any confusion:
MAJORITY %u2013 My definition of MAJORITY in the contest of our country, are the people who are true Indian and hard-core patriot by heart and soul, strong believer of Indian culture, irrespective of practitioner of any belief (Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism etc.). The belief and practice of any particular religion is a personal matter as long as it is not affecting t
