AURANGAZEEB DID INDIA AT A GREAT STRENGTH YOU HE DID WAST INDIA THAT CAN NOT POSSIBLE EVEN TO DAY IF WE STILL PURSUE WE WOULD HAVE BEEN A GREATER POWER IN THE REGION LIKE CHINA HE DEMOLISHED TEMPLE AND CONVERTED HINDUS TO MUSLIMS IT THAT PERIOD THE UPPER CLASS IS ENJOYING ALL PRIVILEGED AND THEY HANDLED LOWER CLASS PEOPLE VERY BADLY THAT CULTURE IS STILL FOLLOWING TEMPLES WORSHIP ARE THE ENJOYMENT OF UPPER CLASS AND NOBLE MANS BECAUSE OF THAT HE DID THAT HE IS NOT USED PUBLIC MONEY FOR HIS PERSONAL AFFAIR HE DOES NOT ALLOW TO BOW SO AND HE FOUND GUILTY HE NEVER GAVE UP ACTION AGAINST TO HIS BROTHER HE IS BEHAVED AS A REAL RULER HE DOES NOT KILLED HINDUS HE DOES NOT ATTACK POOR PEOPLES HUT HE DOES NOT IMPOSE HIGH TAX ONLY HE RACALLED GAZNI BUT THE TOTAL TAX IS LESS THAN COMPARATIVENESS TO LATE EMPORORS HINDU EXTREMIST SHOULD NOTE IE WHATS THE LIVING CONDITION OF PEOPLE IN THAT PERIOD THERE IS NO SATHI,UNTOUCHABILITY ETC HINDUS EXTREMIST ARE ALL WAYS LOOK TO UPPERCLASS PEOPLE PRIVILEGE HOW MUCH PEOPLE HAD BEEN KILLED BY UPPERCLASS PEOPLE BY THEY ARE BARRED FROM GOOD JOB,THEY BEHAVED VERY WORSEN TO LOWER CLASS ALL THESE REASONS AURANGAZIB HATE HNDUS WHY SHOULD YOU OPPOSE THIS ALL HINDUS EMPERORS ARE MERELY FOLLOW THIS SO THEY WAnt loyal to rich people exempt hemu
Auranghazeb was a true divine man who followed his religion sincerely. The Rajputs were dominantly holding all supreme posts during the period of Akbar and Shahjahan. Rememeber, Akbar had 100 Rajput wives and the Rajputs reaped lot of benefits during this period. Jizya tax was reimposed on the Rajputs by Aurangazeb and they were treated as common people. This revoked Hindu rebellions against Aurangazeb. This was a political issue and not a religious issue. Islam has to be followed based on the teachings of the Glorious Quran. Priciples of Sufism is against Islam and the Quran. As a true muslim Aurangazeb stopped this practise and he did not want the followers of Islam to be deviated. Auranghazeb can be named as a tyrant, but he was a good ruler. He was not like his predecessors who spent all their time in dancing with women,and drinking. The historians who could not benefit during Auranghazeb's span, raise the hatred against Auranghazeb on religious grounds. Soldiers die in wars, if many soldiers died in the Mughal side, the same would have been on the Maratha's side. Then why shivaji is a Hero and Auranghazeb is portrayed as a villain. Political reasons promoted many rebellions, including the Sikh Gurus against the Emperor. Wars against a rule has killed many people, but only in the case of Auranghazeb it is portrayed as a Sin. Emperor Akbar the Hero of Indian history and Hindu culture has also waged many wars against many small Hindu kings and annexed their Kingdoms. West
Re: Emperor Aurangahzeb
by super thinker on Jan 19, 2011 10:06 AM Permalink
Dear Ibrahim, i donot know are u naive or fool.Jizya was imposed on the Rajputs in year 1679 only after demise of Sivaji the great who is great rival of Aurangzeb.Ok. If u praise Aurengzeb, eventhough historical facts repeatedly shown,what else we do. If cat closes its eyes, no problem for globe
Re: Emperor Aurangahzeb
by patel hashim on Nov 14, 2010 06:47 PM Permalink
HI, my name is hashim iam from mumbai i am a true lover of aurangzeb ihave many time visited in the tomb aurangzeb i love the simplicity of that great man the great ruler the great falowar of sunni islam .by
Re: Re: Emperor Aurangahzeb
by Mohit Gupta on May 26, 2012 03:13 PM Permalink
Talibans are also very simple. No music, No dance , no entertainment. Are they your ideals also. ???
Re: Re: Emperor Aurangahzeb
by sharat chandra on Nov 22, 2011 02:48 PM Permalink
If u guys love Auranzeb for his simplicity. then u should also Bal Thackray for his patriotism, Narendra Modi for making Gujarat Investment Friendly....wattsay??....
The first is that no nation can move forward unless its children are taught to look squarely at their own history, the good and the bad, the evil and the pure.
The NCERT guidelines ensure that all the drifts between Hindus and Muslims to be portrayed as political and not religious issues. AMU & JNU has taken the task to distort the history to please the Congress-CPI wills who underpinned the textbooks.
There are truths which will never be spoken as India is supposed to be a land of slaves.
Poor Mr. Aurangzeb!, According to Mr. Kanakadurga Murali, he should be awarded a Padmashree or a Bharat Ratna for his deed!
History should be read in a very unbiased format. Read the Sikh history if anyone wishes to know how he treated Indians, in general. He wanted to convert the whole of India into an Islamic state. He ordered the execution of Guru Tegh Bahadur and his 3 followers in the most cruel of manners ever known to mankind. The act of a ruler are not to be judged by individual acts of pardon or occasional good will. It should be read in its entire context.
some people in the west now say that even the Holocaust never took place! Even with convincing proof of unparelled human genocide, some one has the audacity of stating that it never happened. Let the readers judge for themselves the cruelty of Aurangzeb and his tribe who ruled India for 1000 years.
This is the first time that an exhibition was held on Aurangzeb. I read that this exhibition was attacked by Muslim fundamentalists. Is this true? Poor fellows, could not digest the truth about Aurangzeb.
