He is a great person,he should be released of charges against arms act,because he,s already spent 18 months in jail under tada act.recently honble court dismissed the charges against him under TADA ACT.Possesing of arms thus be consider as a act of self defence only for such a high profile of personalities.
RE:SANJAY DUTT
by drrehan ansari on Feb 07, 2007 05:59 PM Permalink
Of course he is a Dharmatma if no Mahatma today, isn't he?. What about the others held with him? any feelings?
RE:RE:SANJAY DUTT
by sat mish on Feb 07, 2007 06:16 PM Permalink
release others also and even the one who are inside due to some other crimes. As no man is a born criminal.
sanju baba is nice person i meet him in blr he is come for shooting for Andolan that time he told if people are see film all india people love him he is respect given to all of them we have open fans club of Sanjubaba in blr in Jayanager we all are pray for his in every were in india.we all are big fans of sanjubaba.
Poor chap! should be released. He has spent more time in jail facing the trial. After all,all celebrities need to keep some weapon or the other to protect themselves from the underworld dons! Nothing wrong in keeping. There are more criminals in the blanket of Politicians. They get scott free and spoil the society more!
RE:Sanjay Dutt
by smv mumbai on Feb 07, 2007 02:37 PM Permalink
Murli, You are answering your point. He had his father and now his sister as MPs. Are they not politicians? Is he not taking shelter of these politician blood relatives ? Micheal Jackson did not hide behind his father or sister to escape JAIL.
He had kept the weapons for his safety... as during that time Dutt Sahb was helping a lot of Muslims in Bandra and it was obvious that they could be attcked.... Let him live freely.
RE:Let Him Free
by hitender singh on Feb 07, 2007 02:30 PM Permalink
AK47 as a saftey ? the whole episode is evident how a bad apple can not only survive the law but also win sympathy
RE:RE:Let Him Free
by Himanshu Singh on Feb 07, 2007 06:02 PM Permalink
Hmm... what about a BAD apple who is still a CM after a genocide and Badd apples who have held post of union home minister, union defence minister .. irrespective of parties. The offences against them are of charging mobs to rioting and selling national interest for personal interest.
RE:RE:RE:Let Him Free
by hitender singh on Feb 07, 2007 06:53 PM Permalink
they incited mobs and hatched conpiracies but weren't stupid enough to get caught with a automatic rifle
everybody here is trying to compare mr.dutt with all the other criminals who are in/out of jails. but why they dont understand one simple reason of letting him out on bail is that he never missed the dates of trial or never tried to flee the country like many other artiste including mr.nadeem who is languishing in a foreign country. we need to go by the genuinty of a person and not just by the reason that he is a popular person and using his money power.if he was really so powerful then he wouldnt have spent all those 13 months in jail at all and would have been out in 13 minutes or 13 days.
RE:sanjay dutt - bail or no bail
by smv mumbai on Feb 07, 2007 02:30 PM Permalink
Your point seems like he has done a great service to the country by being in jail for 13 months and appearing in court regularly. This is nonsense.
He was sure he would use his MP fathers' full pressure on the state and central Congree governments to give him the best treatment despite his criminal acts during the days before 1993 bombings. He is reported to have personally supervised the quantity of explosives that would be enough or NOT to bring Mumbai on its knees. that is not an ORDINARY crime. Nadeem is hiding in London after murdering Swargeeya Gulshan Kumar as his father is NOT A CONGRESS MP.
RE:RE:sanjay dutt - bail or no bail
by G Sunil on Feb 08, 2007 12:12 AM Permalink
Great Surmises, Just remember this Golden rule: 100 Criminals can go unharmed but not a single innocent should be punished.
The issue of Sanjay Dutt is such that many have gone in favour of him, but what about the common man who are languishing in jails for similar cases. Do they don't have any moral responsibility for their family.
According to the evidence the Hon'ble court punished the accused,hence the TADA court not any guilty or any parsiality over their judgment as like sanjat Dutt the other accused persons are aquittal in TADA act must believe the indian judiciary.
