RE:THE BEST SOLUTION FOR CAUVERY WATER ISSUE.......
by rajesh s prajapati on Feb 07, 2007 11:42 AM Permalink
Could you get a feasability study done at the earliest?
RE:RE:BEST SOLUTION FOR CAUVERY WATER DISPUTE.....
by Prasanna Veerabhadraiah on Feb 07, 2007 03:29 PM Permalink
Mr Rao, it will be more humorous when you guys will not any water to drink but yours own(pee). you can enjoy that even more.
New Delhi: The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal has recommended that the Centre constitute a Cauvery Management Board (CMB) to implement the directions in its final award.
The Tribunal, in its 1,000-plus page order passed on Monday, said it was drawing upon its implied power to make such a recommendation, and noted that "whatever machinery is set up should be adequately empowered to implement the Tribunal's decision, as otherwise we are afraid our decision would only be on a piece of paper."
Tamil Nadu had demanded the creation of an independent machinery for the effective implementation of the final award, with powers to take over reservoirs and monitor water release. The Tribunal noted that the mechanism, on the lines of the Bhakra-Beas Management Board, should be independent in character in order to achieve the objective of distribution of the waters as per the equitable shares determined by it. The CMB should comprise a chairman and two members; two representatives of the Central Government and one representative each from Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, besides a secretary. It should be "entrusted with the function of supervision of operation of reservoirs and with regulation of water releases therefrom with the assistance of CWRC."
1. They distributed water is like this, average 1 lack acre of land will get 17 tmcft of water for tamilnadu and 14.5 tmcft of water to karnataka. They said they are growing more paddy and two crops and karnataka is not that much. It's looks like they gave injustice because How can one should say that you are poor and be like that don't comeup in life with improvement
2. Karnataka, maharastra and andra pradesh have shared and gave some tmcft of water to chennai drinking water though tamilnadu have no krisna river project but the verdict says bangalore drinking water you should share within karnataka water share.
The source for cauvery river from cauvery river and sub rivers are added from karnataka land[off course the rivers are natural it's not only our property] the benefits should go equally at least if not more.
Tell me friends where is the justice? Why this hell central government is not responding though karnataka is burning or going to burn. Who is responsible for all these decisions against a big state and about 6 crore people? are we loosing hopes on democracy and indian union?
RE:Tamilnadu is the looser -- that is the bitter truth hidden in this verdict
by Kumar on Feb 07, 2007 11:32 AM Permalink
Very Correct Mr.Bhaskaran! Our people seem to get emotional and have started hurling abuses on the neighouring states without actually going through the facts of the case, and the media seems to fuel fire the emotions of every one in their respective states. Why don't the politians of the respective states address the facts in clear black and white terms dispassionately, and then leave the issue as to whether to react or not to the local farmers!
RE:Tamilnadu is the looser -- that is the bitter truth hidden in this verdict
by venkat on Feb 07, 2007 12:21 PM Permalink
Yes, you are right.. Actually, TN is the loser when compare to the interim award.
But it is happening opposite. Karnataka is complaining but TN seems to be happy.
Probably, TN wants an earlier end to dispute :)
(or)
Are they any other factors due to which TN is reasonably comfortable with this verdict?
RE:Tamilnadu is the looser -- that is the bitter truth hidden in this verdict
by vivek g on Feb 07, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
hope u would have better understood the situation , if Tamilnad would hav been in place of karnataka ie ..Uppper state .....No Human bieng will keep cool seeing Water Flowing to Neighboring state when his own crops are drying ...Hav u faced this situation ...we hav seem this happn .....thus it is not onlly 155 TMC its ...Oh! 155 TMC
Government should think scientifically to resolve such issues. Snatching from one hand and giving it another hand is children's mentality. The government should stop such actions in respect of any issues, since it will never resolve the problem. On the other hand, it will create hatred among the people.
Please dont confuse peoples with wrong information. The judges has taken 17 years of continuous study and given the right things. In my oppinion, rediff has fueled to make voilence with totally wrong information.
I think the aim to publish this article to favour of karnataka and make confusion with baseless thought like ground water theory and all. I request the rediff top management to appologize to publish this kind of wrong information article to fuel the violence.
Please think about the other state peoples those living in karnataka. Totally wrong information published in this article.
Think about integrative india rather than narrow mind concept to write as a article. Write the article with unbaised manner. I believed so far that rediff is a good website to read the news like. But now i came to know i am a fool to think like that.
RE:Cauvery issue article
by on Feb 07, 2007 02:13 PM Permalink
Mr Vijay, taking 17 years need not necessarily mean the decision is right! In fact as recent as few years ago, the tribunal requested (and obtained) the services of an assessment team to aid in its delibrations, this is after sitting quiet for 10 years!!!
RE:Cauvery issue article
by Prasanna Veerabhadraiah on Feb 07, 2007 04:38 PM Permalink
Vijaya, rediff has only given facts. It is upto where you belong to will decide whether it is biased on unbiased. For ignorant/confused people, this article could be biased. The publishers have their career at stake. They would have worked hard to get their statistics right. (but that is not the case for you & me who sit & just comment).
